Wang Zhenhuan, Atakan Muhammed M, Acar Burak, Xiong Rui, Peng Li
Key Lab of General Administration of Sport, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Footscray, Melbourne, Australia.
J Hum Kinet. 2023 Jul 15;87:63-76. doi: 10.5114/jhk/163013. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Low-load resistance training combined with blood flow restriction (BFR) is known to result in muscle hypertrophy and strength similar to that observed with higher loads. However, the effects of resistance training with BFR on cardiac structure and cardiac function remain largely unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this randomized study was to compare the effects of conventional high-load resistance training (HL-RT) with the effects of low-load resistance training with BFR (LL-BFR) on muscle strength and left ventricular function. Sixteen young swimmers (mean ± standard deviation: age = 19.7 ± 1.6 years, body mass = 78.9 ± 9.7 kg, body height = 180.8 ± 5.8 cm) were randomly allocated to a conventional HL-RT group (n = 8) or a LL-BFR group (n = 8) with a pressure band (200 mmHg) placed on both thighs of participants for 4 weeks (3 days•week). Outcome measures were taken at baseline and after 4 weeks of training, and included body composition, one-repetition maximum (1RM) back squat, and echocardiography measures. The 1RM back squat significantly improved (partial eta squared (Ƞ) = 0.365; p = 0.013) in HL-RT (mean difference (Δ) = 6.6 kg; [95% confidence interval (CI) -7.09 to 20.27]) and LL-BFR groups (Δ = 14.7 kg; [95% CI 3.39 to 26.10]), with no main effect of group or group × time interaction (p > 0.05). Interventricular septum end-systolic thickness showed a slight but statistically significant increase in LL-BFR and HL-RT groups (Ƞ = 0.253; p = 0.047), yet there was no main effect of group or group × time interaction (p > 0.05). There were no statistically significant changes (p > 0.05) in other cardiac structure or function parameters (e.g., left ventricular (LV) mass, LV cardiac output, LV ejection fraction, LV stroke volume) after the training programs. Results suggest that 4 weeks of HL-RT and LL-BFR improve muscle strength similarly with limited effects on left ventricular function in young swimmers.
已知低负荷抗阻训练结合血流限制(BFR)会产生与高负荷训练相似的肌肉肥大和力量。然而,抗阻训练结合BFR对心脏结构和心脏功能的影响在很大程度上仍不清楚。因此,本随机研究的目的是比较传统高负荷抗阻训练(HL-RT)与低负荷抗阻训练结合BFR(LL-BFR)对肌肉力量和左心室功能的影响。16名年轻游泳运动员(平均±标准差:年龄 = 19.7±1.6岁,体重 = 78.9±9.7 kg,身高 = 180.8±5.8 cm)被随机分配到传统HL-RT组(n = 8)或LL-BFR组(n = 8),在参与者的双侧大腿上放置压力带(200 mmHg),持续4周(每周3天)。在基线和训练4周后进行结果测量,包括身体成分、一次重复最大值(1RM)后蹲和超声心动图测量。HL-RT组(偏 eta 平方(Ƞ) = 0.365;p = 0.013)和LL-BFR组(Δ = 14.7 kg;[95%置信区间(CI)3.39至26.10])的1RM后蹲均显著改善(平均差异(Δ) = 6.6 kg;[95% CI -7.09至20.27]),组间无主效应或组×时间交互作用(p > 0.05)。LL-BFR组和HL-RT组的室间隔收缩末期厚度有轻微但统计学上显著的增加(Ƞ = 0.253;p = 0.047),但组间无主效应或组×时间交互作用(p > 0.05)。训练计划后,其他心脏结构或功能参数(如左心室(LV)质量、LV心输出量、LV射血分数、LV每搏输出量)无统计学显著变化(p > 0.05)。结果表明,4周的HL-RT和LL-BFR对年轻游泳运动员肌肉力量的改善相似,对左心室功能的影响有限。