Neptune Troy C, Benard Michael F
Department of Biology Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio USA.
Ecol Evol. 2023 Aug 8;13(8):e10400. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10400. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Organisms that shift their phenologies in response to global warming will experience novel photic environments, as photoperiod (daylength) continues to follow the same annual cycle. How different organisms respond to novel photoperiods could result in phenological mismatches and altered interspecific interactions. We conducted an outdoor mesocosm experiment exposing green frog () larvae, gray treefrog () larvae, phytoplankton, periphyton, and zooplankton to a three-month shift in photoperiod: an early-season photoperiod (simulating April) and a late-season photoperiod (simulating July). We manipulated photoperiod by covering and uncovering tanks with clear or light-blocking lids to mimic realistic changes in daylength. We assessed amphibian life history traits and measured phytoplankton, periphyton, and zooplankton abundances. Green frog larvae and gray treefrog metamorphs were more developed under the early-season photoperiod. Gray treefrog total length was also reduced, but photoperiod did not affect green frog total length. Although phytoplankton and periphyton abundances were not affected by photoperiod, copepod nauplii were in greater abundance under the early-season photoperiod. Overall, this simplified aquatic community did not exhibit significant changes to structure when exposed to a three-month shift in photoperiod. Temperate amphibians that breed earlier in the year may develop faster, which may have long-term costs to post-metamorphic growth and performance. Asynchronous shifts in zooplankton abundances in response to altered photoperiods could subsequently affect freshwater community structure. While photoperiod has been shown to individually affect freshwater organisms, our study using replicated outdoor wetland communities shows that the comprehensive effects of photoperiod may be less important than other cues such as temperature and precipitation.
随着全球变暖,生物会改变其物候特征,由于光周期(日照长度)仍遵循相同的年度周期,这些生物将经历全新的光照环境。不同生物对新光周期的反应可能导致物候不匹配以及种间相互作用的改变。我们进行了一项室外中型生态系统实验,将绿蛙()幼虫、灰树蛙()幼虫、浮游植物、周丛生物和浮游动物暴露于为期三个月的光周期变化中:早季光周期(模拟四月)和晚季光周期(模拟七月)。我们通过用透明或遮光盖子覆盖和揭开水箱来控制光周期,以模拟日照长度的实际变化。我们评估了两栖动物的生活史特征,并测量了浮游植物、周丛生物和浮游动物的丰度。在早季光周期下,绿蛙幼虫和灰树蛙变态幼体发育得更好。灰树蛙的全长也有所缩短,但光周期对绿蛙的全长没有影响。虽然浮游植物和周丛生物的丰度不受光周期影响,但在早季光周期下,桡足类无节幼体的丰度更高。总体而言,当暴露于为期三个月的光周期变化时,这个简化的水生群落结构并未表现出显著变化。在一年中较早繁殖的温带两栖动物可能发育得更快,这可能会对变态后的生长和性能产生长期成本。浮游动物丰度因光周期改变而出现的异步变化随后可能会影响淡水群落结构。虽然光周期已被证明会单独影响淡水生物,但我们使用重复的室外湿地群落进行的研究表明,光周期的综合影响可能不如温度和降水等其他因素重要。