Huemer Florian, Dunkl Celine, Rinnerthaler Gabriel, Schlick Konstantin, Heregger Ronald, Emmanuel Klaus, Neureiter Daniel, Klieser Eckhard, Deutschmann Michael, Roeder Falk, Greil Richard, Weiss Lukas
Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Front Oncol. 2023 Jul 25;13:1222951. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1222951. eCollection 2023.
Age-standardized mortality rates for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are highest among elderly patients. In current clinical guidelines, treatment recommendations for this patient population are based on a limited number of clinical trials.
In this monocentric, retrospective analysis we characterized patients aged ≥70 years undergoing systemic therapy for mCRC and overall survival (OS) was investigated.
We included 117 unselected, consecutive mCRC patients aged ≥70 years undergoing systemic therapy for mCRC between February 2009 and July 2022. Median OS was 25.6 months (95% CI: 21.8-29.4). The median age was 78 years (range: 70-90) and 21%, 48%, 26% and 5% had an ECOG performance score of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median number of systemic therapy lines was 2 (range: 1-5). The choice of first-line chemotherapy backbone (doublet/triplet versus mono) did not impact OS (HR: 0.83, p=0.50) or the probability of receiving subsequent therapy (p=0.697). Metastasectomy and/or local ablative treatment in the liver, lung, peritoneum and/or other organs were applied in 26 patients (22%) with curative intent. First-line anti-EGFR-based therapy showed a trend towards longer OS compared to anti-VEGF-based therapy or chemotherapy alone in left-sided mCRC (anti-EGFR: 39.3 months versus anti-VEGF: 27.3 months versus chemotherapy alone: 13.8 months, p=0.105). In multivariable analysis, metastasectomy and/or local ablative treatment with curative intent (yes versus no, HR: 0.22, p<0.001), the ECOG performance score (2 versus 0, HR: 3.07, p=0.007; 3 versus 0, HR: 3.66, p=0.053) and the presence of liver metastases (yes versus no, HR: 1.79, p=0.049) were independently associated with OS.
Our findings corroborate front-line monochemotherapy in combination with targeted therapy as the treatment of choice for elderly mCRC patients with palliative treatment intent. Metastasectomy and/or local ablative treatment with curative intent are feasible and may improve OS in selected elderly mCRC patients.
转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的年龄标准化死亡率在老年患者中最高。在当前的临床指南中,针对这一患者群体的治疗建议基于数量有限的临床试验。
在这项单中心回顾性分析中,我们对年龄≥70岁接受mCRC全身治疗的患者进行了特征描述,并对总生存期(OS)进行了研究。
我们纳入了2009年2月至2022年7月期间117例未经选择、连续的年龄≥70岁接受mCRC全身治疗的患者。中位OS为25.6个月(95%CI:21.8 - 29.4)。中位年龄为78岁(范围:70 - 90岁),东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态评分为0、1、2和3的患者分别占21%、48%、26%和5%。全身治疗线数的中位数为2(范围:1 - 5)。一线化疗方案(双联/三联与单药)的选择对OS(风险比[HR]:0.83,p = 0.50)或接受后续治疗的概率(p = 0.697)没有影响。26例(22%)患者接受了以治愈为目的的肝、肺、腹膜和/或其他器官的转移灶切除术和/或局部消融治疗。在左侧mCRC中,一线基于抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的治疗与基于抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)的治疗或单纯化疗相比,显示出OS延长的趋势(抗EGFR:39.3个月,抗VEGF:27.3个月,单纯化疗:13.8个月,p = 0.105)。在多变量分析中,以治愈为目的的转移灶切除术和/或局部消融治疗(是与否,HR:0.22,p < 0.001)、ECOG体能状态评分(2与0,HR:3.07,p = 0.007;3与0,HR:3.66,p = 0.053)以及肝转移的存在(是与否,HR:1.79,p = 0.049)与OS独立相关。
我们的研究结果证实,一线单药化疗联合靶向治疗是有姑息治疗意向的老年mCRC患者的首选治疗方法。以治愈为目的的转移灶切除术和/或局部消融治疗是可行的,可能会改善部分老年mCRC患者的OS。