• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过学术-州立公共卫生部门的合作,为 2022-2027 年伊利诺伊综合癌症控制计划创建和实施社区参与战略。

Creating and Implementing a Community Engagement Strategy for the 2022-2027 Illinois Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan Through an Academic-State Public Health Department Partnership.

机构信息

University of Illinois Cancer Center, 818 S Wolcott Ave (MC709), Chicago, IL 60612 (

School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Aug 10;20:E69. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.220422.

DOI:10.5888/pcd20.220422
PMID:37562068
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10431926/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Comprehensive cancer control (CCC) plans are state-level blueprints that identify regional cancer priorities and health equity strategies. Coalitions are encouraged to engage with community members, advocacy groups, people representing multiple sectors, and working partners throughout the development process. We describe the community and legislative engagement strategy developed and implemented during 2020-2022 for the 2022-2027 Illinois CCC plan.

METHODS

The engagement strategies were grounded in theory and evidence-based tools and resources. It was developed and implemented by coalition members representing the state health department and an academic partner, with feedback from the larger coalition. The strategy included a statewide town hall, 8 focus groups, and raising awareness of the plan among state policy makers.

RESULTS

A total of 112 people participated in the town hall and focus groups, including 40 (36%) cancer survivors, 31 (28%) cancer caregivers, and 18 (16%) Latino and 26 (23%) African American residents. Fourteen of 53 (26%) focus group participants identified as rural. Participants identified drivers of cancer disparities (eg, lack of a comprehensive health insurance system, discrimination, transportation access) and funding and policy priorities. Illinois House Resolution 0675, the Illinois Cancer Control Plan, was passed in March 2022.

CONCLUSION

The expertise and voices of community members affected by cancer can be documented and reflected in CCC plans. CCC plans can be brought to the attention of policy makers. Other coalitions working on state plans may consider replicating our strategy. Ultimately, CCC plans should reflect health equity principles and prioritize eliminating cancer disparities.

摘要

简介

综合癌症控制(CCC)计划是州一级的蓝图,确定区域癌症重点和公平策略。鼓励联盟在整个发展过程中与社区成员、倡导团体、代表多个部门的人员以及工作伙伴合作。我们描述了在 2020-2022 年期间为 2022-2027 年伊利诺伊州 CCC 计划制定和实施的社区和立法参与策略。

方法

参与策略基于理论和循证工具和资源。它是由代表州卫生部门和学术合作伙伴的联盟成员开发和实施的,并得到了更大的联盟的反馈。该策略包括全州范围的市政厅会议、8 个焦点小组,并提高州政策制定者对该计划的认识。

结果

共有 112 人参加了市政厅会议和焦点小组,包括 40 名(36%)癌症幸存者、31 名(28%)癌症护理人员以及 18 名(16%)拉丁裔和 26 名(23%)非裔美国居民。14 名(26%)焦点小组参与者来自农村地区。参与者确定了癌症差异的驱动因素(例如,缺乏全面的医疗保险系统、歧视、交通便利性)以及资金和政策重点。2022 年 3 月,伊利诺伊州众议院第 0675 号决议,即《伊利诺伊州癌症控制计划》获得通过。

结论

受癌症影响的社区成员的专业知识和声音可以在 CCC 计划中得到记录和体现。CCC 计划可以引起政策制定者的注意。其他致力于州计划的联盟可以考虑复制我们的策略。最终,CCC 计划应反映公平原则,并优先消除癌症差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/10431926/9937e9bb5d02/PCD-20-E69s02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/10431926/378764a3b7a2/PCD-20-E69s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/10431926/9937e9bb5d02/PCD-20-E69s02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/10431926/378764a3b7a2/PCD-20-E69s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/10431926/9937e9bb5d02/PCD-20-E69s02.jpg

相似文献

1
Creating and Implementing a Community Engagement Strategy for the 2022-2027 Illinois Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan Through an Academic-State Public Health Department Partnership.通过学术-州立公共卫生部门的合作,为 2022-2027 年伊利诺伊综合癌症控制计划创建和实施社区参与战略。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Aug 10;20:E69. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.220422.
2
Prioritizing rural populations in state comprehensive cancer control plans: a qualitative assessment.优先考虑州综合癌症控制计划中的农村人口:定性评估。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):159-169. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01673-3. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
3
Developing a community action plan to eliminate cancer disparities: lessons learned.制定消除癌症差异的社区行动计划:经验教训
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011 Summer;5(2):161-8. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2011.0013.
4
The Mini Report: a Practical Tool to Address Lung Cancer Disparities in Rural Communities.迷你报告:解决农村社区肺癌差异的实用工具。
J Cancer Educ. 2017 Jun;32(2):293-300. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0921-1.
5
Promoting Health and Behavioral Health Equity in California.促进加利福尼亚州的健康与行为健康公平。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Jan-Feb;22 Suppl 1:S100-6. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000309.
6
Assessment of Action Plans as a Guide for Equity-Focused Coalition Work.行动计划评估:促进公平的联盟工作指南。
Health Promot Pract. 2023 Mar;24(2):292-299. doi: 10.1177/15248399211059139. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
7
Advancing engagement and capacity for rural cancer control: a mixed-methods case study of a Community-Academic Advisory Board in the Appalachia region of Southwest Virginia.推进农村癌症控制的参与度和能力:弗吉尼亚州西南部阿巴拉契亚地区社区-学术咨询委员会的混合方法案例研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 22;7(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00285-y.
8
LGBTQ+ cancer: priority or lip service? A qualitative content analysis of LGBTQ+ considerations in U.S. state, jurisdiction, and tribal comprehensive cancer control plans.LGBTQ+ 癌症:优先考虑还是口惠而实不至?对美国州、司法管辖区和部落综合癌症控制计划中 LGBTQ+ 考虑因素的定性内容分析。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Sep;35(9):1297-1309. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01887-z. Epub 2024 May 25.
9
Illinois Unidos: A Community Demands Equity, Justice, and Inclusion.伊利诺伊团结组织:一个呼吁公平、正义和包容的社区。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Oct;111(S3):S204-S207. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306407.
10
Evolution of comprehensive cancer control plans and partnerships.综合癌症控制计划与伙伴关系的演变。
Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Dec;29(12):1181-1193. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1112-2. Epub 2018 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Community engagement in the context of cancer: scoping review of definitions and measures to inform program-level analysis.癌症背景下的社区参与:关于定义和措施的范围综述,以为项目层面的分析提供信息。
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-02026-y.
2
Harnessing the Power of Community Engagement for Population Health.利用社区参与的力量促进人群健康。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2025 Jun 5;22:E25. doi: 10.5888/pcd22.250189.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing Meaningful Community Engagement: A Conceptual Model to Advance Health Equity through Transformed Systems for Health: Organizing Committee for Assessing Meaningful Community Engagement in Health & Health Care Programs & Policies.评估有意义的社区参与:通过变革性卫生系统促进健康公平的概念模型:卫生与医疗保健项目及政策中有意义的社区参与评估组织委员会
NAM Perspect. 2022 Feb 14;2022. doi: 10.31478/202202c. eCollection 2022.
2
Implementation of virtual focus groups for qualitative data collection in a global pandemic.在全球大流行期间实施虚拟焦点小组进行定性数据收集
Am J Surg. 2021 May;221(5):918-922. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
3
Comprehensive cancer control in the U.S.: summarizing twenty years of progress and looking ahead.
美国的综合癌症控制:总结二十年进展并展望未来。
Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Dec;29(12):1305-1309. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1124-y. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
4
Collaborating to conquer cancer: the role of partnerships in comprehensive cancer control.携手战胜癌症:伙伴关系在癌症综合控制中的作用。
Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Dec;29(12):1173-1180. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1118-9. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
5
Examining comprehensive cancer control partnerships, plans, and program interventions: successes and lessons learned from a utilization-focused evaluation.审视综合癌症控制伙伴关系、计划及项目干预措施:基于利用情况评估的成功经验与教训
Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Dec;29(12):1163-1171. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1113-1. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
6
Communication and comprehensive cancer control coalitions: lessons from two decades of campaigns, outreach, and training.癌症综合防治沟通联盟:二十年宣传、推广及培训经验教训
Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Dec;29(12):1239-1247. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1122-0. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
7
Evolution of comprehensive cancer control plans and partnerships.综合癌症控制计划与伙伴关系的演变。
Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Dec;29(12):1181-1193. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1112-2. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
8
Mutual benefits in academic-service partnership: An integrative review.学术-服务伙伴关系中的互惠互利:综合述评。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Sep;68:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 May 30.
9
Virtual Versus In-Person Focus Groups: Comparison of Costs, Recruitment, and Participant Logistics.虚拟焦点小组与面对面焦点小组:成本、招募及参与者安排的比较
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 22;19(3):e80. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6980.
10
Promoting public health through state cancer control plans: a review of capacity and sustainability.通过州癌症控制计划促进公众健康:对能力和可持续性的审查。
Front Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;3:40. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00040. eCollection 2015.