Krishnaraj Anusha, Gupta Pratima, Bhatia Mohit, Omar Balram Ji
Department of Microbiology, St John's Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
J Lab Physicians. 2023 Jan 18;15(3):336-343. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1760401. eCollection 2023 Sep.
species has become a leading cause of nosocomial infections in recent years. The aim of the study was to establish the usefulness of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) for the identification of species with respect to conventional biochemical methods and MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus system and to compare the antibiotic susceptibility test results Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method with MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus automated identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing system. The study sample comprised 100 clinical isolates of species. They were all identified using MALDI-TOF MS and compared with other two identification systems. Comparison of categorical variables by Fisher's exact test or Pearson's chi-square test was done. All statistical tools were two tailed, and a significant level < 0.05 was used. All statistical tests were performed using SPSS v22.0 (Armonk IBM Corp., New York, United States). Cohen's kappa coefficients were also calculated and used as applicable. MALDI-TOF MS revealed 92 , 2 , 3 , and 1 each was identified as , , and . There was moderate agreement between identification by MicroScan WalkAway and MALDI-TOF, and substantial agreement between conventional biochemical tests and MALDI-TOF. We found that there was a 100% categorical agreement with respect to susceptibility of aminoglycosides (amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin) and cephalosporins (ceftazidime, cefepime, cefotaxime) between disk diffusion method and MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus system. Total of 16 errors were observed. Although MALDI-TOF MS could be useful to identify but not other species in the genus, it is a rapid, reliable method and can be routinely used in clinical laboratories.
近年来,该菌种已成为医院感染的主要原因之一。本研究的目的是确定基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间(MALDI-TOF)质谱(MS)相对于传统生化方法和MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus系统在鉴定该菌种方面的实用性,并比较Kirby-Bauer纸片扩散法与MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus自动化鉴定及抗菌药物敏感性测试系统的抗生素敏感性试验结果。本研究样本包括100株该菌种的临床分离株。它们均采用MALDI-TOF MS进行鉴定,并与其他两种鉴定系统进行比较。采用Fisher精确检验或Pearson卡方检验对分类变量进行比较。所有统计工具均为双侧检验,显著性水平设定为P < 0.05。所有统计分析均使用SPSS v22.0(美国纽约阿蒙克IBM公司)进行。还计算了Cohen's kappa系数并在适用时使用。MALDI-TOF MS鉴定出92株该菌种,2株被鉴定为其他菌种,3株被鉴定为另一菌种,1株被鉴定为又一菌种。MicroScan WalkAway鉴定结果与MALDI-TOF之间存在中度一致性,传统生化试验与MALDI-TOF之间存在高度一致性。我们发现,在氨基糖苷类(阿米卡星、庆大霉素、妥布霉素)和头孢菌素类(头孢他啶、头孢吡肟、头孢噻肟)的药敏试验结果方面,纸片扩散法与MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus系统之间存在100%的分类一致性。共观察到16处误差。虽然MALDI-TOF MS可用于鉴定该属中的该菌种,但不能鉴定其他菌种,它是一种快速、可靠的方法,可在临床实验室常规使用。