Khan Zahra, Qureshi Onaiza, Pasha Aneeta, Majid Osama, Saleem Saniya, Fearon Pasco, Shaikh Madiha
Interactive Research and Development, Karachi, Pakistan.
Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 20;14:1086910. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1086910. eCollection 2023.
Psychosis is known to have an adverse impact on an individual's quality of life, social and occupational functioning. A lack of treatment options for psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia contributes to adverse outcomes for individuals. A significant proportion of people with psychosis consult both formal and traditional routes of care. This warrants a need to explore perceptions around treatment options provided by diverse care providers, as the identification of avenues for support can improve psychiatric, alternative treatment and social outcomes.
Focus groups discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) were used. Interactive Research and Development (IRD) research staff conducted 20 IDIs and 2 FGDs to obtain information about the perspectives, treatment pathways and experiences of individuals with psychosis, their caregivers, and service providers. Questions for clinician care providers and faith healers revolved around perceptions of psychosis, service users' background, subject knowledge and treatment, feedback and referral mechanisms, and promotion of services. A thematic analysis was used to analyze the interviews and coding was conducted on NVivo.
The results were categorized into five themes: perception of psychosis, experience of seeking/receiving care, assessment and diagnosis methods, promotion of services, and living with psychosis. Across service providers and patients, there was a wide variety of causes attributed to psychosis, and an overall lack of awareness regarding severe mental health conditions from both formal and informal care-providers. Biomedical treatment received mixed reviews, while some reported it as beneficial, the limited number of institutes and clinicians to cater for patients, stigma within society and care providers, the burden of caregiving, and misinformation from faith healers were all significant barriers to treatment.
The results highlight the use of traditional healing practices for psychosis in Pakistan, which, coupled with inadequate referral mechanisms, present an opportunity to bridge the treatment gap between clinical and traditional healing practices through integration of treatment within community structures and systems. Better awareness of psychosis and its treatment methods, alongside interventions that reduce stigma could help facilitate help-seeking behavior and reduce the burden of caregiving.
众所周知,精神病会对个人生活质量、社会和职业功能产生不利影响。精神分裂症等精神障碍缺乏治疗选择会导致个体出现不良后果。相当一部分精神病患者会寻求正规和传统的治疗途径。这就需要探索对不同护理提供者提供的治疗选择的看法,因为确定支持途径可以改善精神、替代治疗和社会结果。
采用焦点小组讨论(FGD)和深入访谈(IDI)。互动研究与发展(IRD)研究人员进行了20次深入访谈和2次焦点小组讨论,以获取有关精神病患者及其护理人员和服务提供者的观点、治疗途径和经历的信息。针对临床护理提供者和信仰治疗师的问题围绕对精神病的看法、服务使用者的背景、主题知识和治疗、反馈和转诊机制以及服务推广展开。采用主题分析法对访谈进行分析,并在NVivo上进行编码。
结果分为五个主题:对精神病的看法、寻求/接受护理的经历、评估和诊断方法、服务推广以及与精神病共存。在服务提供者和患者中,导致精神病的原因多种多样,正规和非正规护理提供者对严重精神健康状况的总体认识都不足。生物医学治疗的评价不一,虽然有些人报告其有益,但能够照顾患者的机构和临床医生数量有限、社会和护理提供者中的污名化、护理负担以及信仰治疗师提供的错误信息都是治疗的重大障碍。
结果凸显了巴基斯坦将传统治疗方法用于治疗精神病的情况,再加上转诊机制不完善,这为通过将治疗纳入社区结构和系统来弥合临床和传统治疗方法之间的治疗差距提供了契机。提高对精神病及其治疗方法的认识,同时采取减少污名化的干预措施,有助于促进求助行为并减轻护理负担。