DeJonckere Philippe Henri, Lebacq Jean
Federal Agency for Occupational Risks, Brussels, Belgium.
University of Louvain, Neurosciences, Brussels, Belgium.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Mar 29;27(3):e499-e510. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1750766. eCollection 2023 Jul.
The question as to whether occupational noise exposure causes symmetrical or asymmetrical hearing loss is still controversial and incompletely understood. Two electrophysiological methods (cortical evoked response audiometry: CERA and auditory steady state responses: ASSR) were used to address this issue. 156 subjects with a well-documented history of noise exposure, a wide range of noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) and without middle ear pathology underwent both a CERA and an ASSR examination in the context of an exhaustive medicolegal expert assessment intended for possible compensation. Whatever the method (CERA or ASSR), the average electrophysiological hearing thresholds (1-2-3 kHz) are significantly worse in the left ear. The right - left differences in CERA and ASSR thresholds are strongly correlated with each other. No significant effect of frequency is found. No correlation is observed between right - left differences in hearing thresholds and either age or degree of hearing loss. In NIHL, there is an actual average right - left difference of about 2.23 dB, i.e., 3.2%, the left ear being more impaired.
职业噪声暴露会导致对称性还是非对称性听力损失这一问题仍然存在争议,且尚未完全明晰。使用了两种电生理方法(皮层诱发反应测听法:CERA和听觉稳态反应:ASSR)来解决这个问题。156名有充分记录的噪声暴露史、广泛的噪声性听力损失(NIHL)且无中耳病变的受试者,在旨在可能进行赔偿的详尽法医学专家评估背景下,接受了CERA和ASSR检查。无论采用哪种方法(CERA或ASSR),左耳的平均电生理听力阈值(1 - 2 - 3千赫兹)明显更差。CERA和ASSR阈值的左右差异彼此高度相关。未发现频率有显著影响。听力阈值的左右差异与年龄或听力损失程度之间均未观察到相关性。在噪声性听力损失中,实际左右平均差异约为2.23分贝,即3.2%,左耳受损更严重。