Suppr超能文献

职业性噪声性听力损失情况下出于法医学目的的客观频率特异性听力阈值定义:多频稳态诱发电位优于听性脑干反应。

Objective frequency-specific hearing thresholds definition for medicolegal purposes in case of occupational NIHL: ASSR outperforms CERA.

作者信息

DeJonckere P H, Millet B, Van Gool R, Martens A, Lebacq J

机构信息

Federal Agency for Occupational Risks, Brussels, Belgium.

Institute of Neurosciences, University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Otol. 2021 Oct;16(4):210-219. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

Abstract

Audiological use of the 40 Hz-ASSR (auditory steady state responses) could be valuable for objectively estimating the frequency-specific threshold in adults undergoing an expertise examination for medicolegal and/or compensation purposes. The present prospective study was set up to clarify the relationship between the thresholds obtained by cortical evoked response audiometry (CERA) and by 40 Hz-ASSR, in the same ears, within a large homogeneous sample of 164 subjects (328 ears) with NIHL and well documented exposure to noise. All these subjects claimed financial compensation for occupational NIHL, and there was a suspicion of exaggeration of the reported NIHLs. ASSR thresholds show a good correlation with the CERA thresholds. However, a systematic shift is noticed, ASSR thresholds being on average (1-2 - 3 kHz) 4.38 dB lower (i.e. showing less hearing loss) than CERA thresholds. Moreover, the binaural multiple ASSR technique allows a considerable time gain when compared to the CERA.

摘要

40赫兹听觉稳态反应(40 Hz-ASSR)在听力学上的应用,对于客观评估因法医学和/或赔偿目的而接受专业检查的成年人的频率特异性阈值可能具有重要价值。本前瞻性研究旨在明确在164名患有噪声性听力损失(NIHL)且有充分记录的噪声暴露史的同质大样本受试者(328只耳朵)中,同一耳朵通过皮层诱发反应测听法(CERA)和40 Hz-ASSR获得的阈值之间的关系。所有这些受试者都因职业性NIHL要求经济赔偿,并且怀疑他们夸大了所报告的NIHL程度。ASSR阈值与CERA阈值显示出良好的相关性。然而,注意到存在系统性偏移,ASSR阈值平均比CERA阈值低4.38分贝(即在1 - 2 - 3千赫兹时显示出较轻的听力损失)。此外,与CERA相比,双耳多重ASSR技术可显著节省时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aaf/8438637/dfcd3e4f44df/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验