Kateliya Rohit, Dubey Mamta, Chandra Subhash, Sahay Nishant
Department of Anaesthesiology, ESIC, Andheri, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Anaesthesiology, AIIMS Patna, Phulwarisharif, Patna, Bihar, India.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Apr-Jun;39(2):258-263. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_396_21. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
Considerable importance has been attached to early recovery and discharge readiness after surgeries. Many centers use total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) as their anesthesia technique of choice. Target-controlled infusions (TCI) have been proposed as a method to precisely deliver continuous infusions of propofol and opioids as compared to the traditionally used manual-controlled infusion (MCI) methods. However, TCI has also been shown to result in the administration of larger doses of propofol which could cause delayed emergence and recovery from anesthesia. Studies involving TCI have focused mainly on its effects on anesthesia induction but not much literature is available on recovery profiles of patients on TCI. This study was designed to compare the effect of conventionally used MCI methods versus the target-controlled infusion (TCI) method of administering TIVA on recovery characteristics in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
This was a prospective randomized interventional study on 54 patients. Our primary objective was to compare the rates of recovery from anesthesia as judged by four parameters. Time to return of spontaneous ventilation, time to respond to verbal commands, time to extubation, and time to shift patient out of the operating room after stoppage of propofol infusion. As secondary objectives, intraoperative average bispectral index (BIS) values and total anesthetic drugs (propofol and fentanyl) consumption were also compared.
We noted that for laparoscopic surgeries lasting less than 4 hours, both MCI and TCI techniques of TIVA have comparable rates of recovery after the stoppage of propofol infusion. Total consumption of propofol and fentanyl was also similar; however, with the use of the TCI method of TIVA, better depth of anesthesia as evidenced by lower average BIS levels was noted.
Recovery rates after TIVA using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) system are similar to BIS-guided MCIs in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery lasting less than 4 hours. TCI resulted in better depths of anesthesia though per kg/min consumption of propofol was found to be more.
手术后的早期恢复和出院准备受到了极大的重视。许多中心将全静脉麻醉(TIVA)作为其首选的麻醉技术。与传统使用的手动控制输注(MCI)方法相比,靶控输注(TCI)已被提议作为一种精确输送丙泊酚和阿片类药物持续输注的方法。然而,TCI也被证明会导致丙泊酚剂量的更大使用,这可能会导致麻醉苏醒延迟和恢复延迟。涉及TCI的研究主要集中在其对麻醉诱导的影响上,但关于接受TCI的患者恢复情况的文献并不多。本研究旨在比较传统使用的MCI方法与靶控输注(TCI)方法在腹腔镜手术患者中实施TIVA对恢复特征的影响。
这是一项对54例患者进行的前瞻性随机干预研究。我们的主要目的是比较由四个参数判断的麻醉恢复率。自主呼吸恢复时间、对言语指令的反应时间、拔管时间以及丙泊酚输注停止后将患者转出手术室的时间。作为次要目的,还比较了术中平均脑电双频指数(BIS)值和总麻醉药物(丙泊酚和芬太尼)消耗量。
我们注意到,对于持续时间少于4小时的腹腔镜手术,TIVA的MCI和TCI技术在丙泊酚输注停止后的恢复率相当。丙泊酚和芬太尼的总消耗量也相似;然而,使用TIVA的TCI方法时,平均BIS水平较低表明麻醉深度更好。
在持续时间少于4小时的腹腔镜手术患者中,使用靶控输注(TCI)系统的TIVA后的恢复率与BIS引导的MCI相似。虽然发现每千克每分钟丙泊酚消耗量更多,但TCI导致了更好的麻醉深度。