Stevens Hannah, Gallant Julien, Foster Jennifer, Horne David, Krmpotic Kristina
Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Department of Pediatric Critical Care, IWK Health, Halifax, Canada.
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2021 Jun 19;12(3):167-172. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730933. eCollection 2023 Sep.
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is commonly used in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for postextubation respiratory support. This hypothesis-generating retrospective cohort study aimed to compare postextubation PICU length of stay in infants extubated to HFNC and low flow oxygen (LF) in PICU following cardiac surgery. Of 136 infants (newborn to 1 year) who were intubated and mechanically ventilated in PICU following cardiac surgery, 72 (53%) were extubated to HFNC and 64 (47%) to LF. Compared with patients extubated to LF, those extubated to HFNC had significantly longer durations of cardiopulmonary bypass (152 vs. 109 minutes; = 0.002), aortic cross-clamp (90 vs. 63 minutes; = 0.003), and invasive mechanical ventilation (3.2 vs. 1.6 days; < 0.001), although demographic and preoperative clinical variables were similar. No significant difference was observed in postextubation PICU length of stay between HFNC and LF groups in unadjusted analysis (3.3 vs. 2.6 days, respectively; = 0.19) and after controlling for potential confounding variables (F [1,125] = 0.17, = 0.68, = 0.16). Escalation of therapy was similar between HFNC and LF groups (8.3 vs. 14.1%; = 0.41). HFNC was effective as rescue therapy for six patients in the LF group requiring escalation of therapy. Need for reintubation was similar between HFNC and LF groups (8.3 vs. 4.7%; = 0.5). Although extubation to HFNC was associated with a trend toward longer postextubation PICU length of stay and was successfully used as rescue therapy for several infants extubated to LF, our results must be interpreted with caution given the limitations of our study.
高流量鼻导管(HFNC)疗法常用于儿科重症监护病房(PICU),用于拔管后的呼吸支持。这项产生假设的回顾性队列研究旨在比较心脏手术后在PICU中拔管至HFNC和低流量氧气(LF)的婴儿拔管后在PICU的住院时间。在心脏手术后在PICU接受插管和机械通气的136例婴儿(新生儿至1岁)中,72例(53%)拔管至HFNC,64例(47%)拔管至LF。与拔管至LF的患者相比,拔管至HFNC的患者体外循环时间明显更长(152分钟对109分钟;P = 0.002)、主动脉阻断时间更长(90分钟对63分钟;P = 0.003)以及有创机械通气时间更长(3.2天对1.6天;P < 0.001),尽管人口统计学和术前临床变量相似。在未调整分析中,HFNC组和LF组拔管后在PICU的住院时间无显著差异(分别为3.3天和2.6天;P = 0.19),在控制潜在混杂变量后也无显著差异(F [1,125] = 0.17,P = 0.68,r² = 0.16)。HFNC组和LF组治疗升级情况相似(8.3%对14.1%;P = 0.41)。HFNC作为LF组中6例需要治疗升级患者的挽救治疗有效。HFNC组和LF组再次插管的需求相似(8.3%对4.7%;P = 0.5)。尽管拔管至HFNC与拔管后在PICU住院时间延长的趋势相关,并且成功用作一些拔管至LF的婴儿的挽救治疗,但鉴于我们研究的局限性,我们的结果必须谨慎解读。