Suppr超能文献

关于推特上医生宣传活动的范围综述

A Scoping Review of Physician Advocacy on Twitter.

作者信息

Cahill Abigail M, Carlson John C

机构信息

Pediatrics, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, USA.

Pediatrics, Oschner Health System, New Orleans, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jul 10;15(7):e41632. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41632. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Abstract

Twitter has been adopted by physicians across most medical specialties; it allows for the wide dissemination of information and calls to action, brings new stakeholders into collations, promotes academic engagement, and fosters collaboration between academia and private practice. In this review of the literature, we briefly outline the state of advocacy in health care and summarize current Twitter-based advocacy efforts in the major specialties of health care, identifying both successful strategies as well as gaps in Twitter advocacy research. Relevant articles were obtained via PubMed and Google Scholar searches using the phrases "Twitter advocacy healthcare," "[specialty name] Twitter" and "[specialty name] Twitter advocacy." Several overarching themes were found to be widely utilized in specialty-specific discussions of Twitter advocacy efforts: organizing under a specific hashtag, fostering dialogue between stakeholders, and tweeting using personalized, action-oriented language. Fields such as pediatrics, heme/onc, ENT, and ophthalmology have most thoroughly embraced the desire to learn how to most effectively advocate on Twitter. Other fields such as OBGYN, cardiology, and surgery have less academic focus on online advocacy. Outside of advocacy efforts, the research and academic benefits of Twitter are well described in nearly every specialty. In conclusion, while clinicians are encouraged to advocate online, only broad strategies for online engagement are currently offered. Additional research into the details of how to successfully create an online profile and Twitter presence is needed to ensure all physicians are able to maximize their advocacy efforts, with clarification of the goals and objectives of this engagement also required.

摘要

大多数医学专业的医生都在使用推特;它能广泛传播信息并呼吁采取行动,吸引新的利益相关者参与讨论,促进学术交流,并推动学术界与私人执业之间的合作。在这篇文献综述中,我们简要概述了医疗保健领域的宣传状况,总结了目前在医疗保健主要专业中基于推特的宣传努力,既确定了成功策略,也指出了推特宣传研究中的差距。通过使用“推特宣传医疗保健”、“[专业名称]推特”和“[专业名称]推特宣传”等短语在PubMed和谷歌学术搜索中获取相关文章。在关于推特宣传努力的特定专业讨论中,发现有几个总体主题被广泛使用:在特定主题标签下组织活动、促进利益相关者之间的对话,以及使用个性化的、以行动为导向的语言发推文。儿科学、血液学/肿瘤学、耳鼻喉科和眼科等领域最全面地接受了学习如何在推特上最有效地进行宣传的愿望。妇产科、心脏病学和外科等其他领域对在线宣传的学术关注较少。在宣传努力之外,推特在几乎每个专业中对研究和学术的益处都有很好的描述。总之,虽然鼓励临床医生进行在线宣传,但目前仅提供了广泛的在线参与策略。需要对如何成功创建在线个人资料和推特形象的细节进行更多研究,以确保所有医生都能最大限度地发挥他们的宣传努力,同时也需要明确这种参与的目标和目的。

相似文献

1
A Scoping Review of Physician Advocacy on Twitter.关于推特上医生宣传活动的范围综述
Cureus. 2023 Jul 10;15(7):e41632. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41632. eCollection 2023 Jul.

本文引用的文献

2
Characterizing Twitter Influencers in Radiation Oncology.辐射肿瘤学领域推特影响者的特征分析
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022 Mar 23;7(6):100919. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100919. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
3
Researchers in cardiology - Why and how to get on Twitter?心脏病学领域的研究人员——为何以及如何使用推特?
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Mar 28;40:101010. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101010. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
#neoTwitter: evaluation of its use within the neonatal-perinatal community.#新推特:在新生儿围产期领域的使用评估
J Perinatol. 2022 Oct;42(10):1409-1411. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01373-x. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
8
Social Media Superpowers in Obstetrics and Gynecology.社交媒体在妇产科领域的超级影响力
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021 Dec;48(4):787-800. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2021.07.007.
9
Use of Social Media in the Practice of Medicine.社交媒体在医学实践中的应用。
Am J Med. 2022 Feb;135(2):138-140. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.08.030. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
10
Association Between Twitter Mentions and Academic Citations in Otolaryngology Literature.耳鼻喉科文献中推特提及与学术引用的关联。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Jul;167(1):73-78. doi: 10.1177/01945998211044680. Epub 2021 Sep 14.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验