• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Digital haemophilia: Insights into the use of social media for haemophilia care, research and advocacy.数字血友病:社交媒体在血友病护理、研究和宣传中的应用洞察。
Haemophilia. 2022 Mar;28(2):247-253. doi: 10.1111/hae.14510. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
2
Using Twitter Comments to Understand People's Experiences of UK Health Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Thematic and Sentiment Analysis.利用推特评论了解新冠疫情期间英国人对英国医疗保健的体验:主题和情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 25;23(10):e31101. doi: 10.2196/31101.
3
The pattern and use of Twitter among dental schools in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯牙科学院的 Twitter 使用模式和情况。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 8;17(9):e0272628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272628. eCollection 2022.
4
Dynamics of social media behavior before and after SARS-CoV-2 infection.新冠病毒感染前后社交媒体行为的动态变化。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;10:1069931. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1069931. eCollection 2022.
5
#Covid-19: An exploratory investigation of hashtag usage on Twitter.Covid-19:推特话题标签使用情况的探索性调查。
Health Policy. 2021 Apr;125(4):541-547. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
6
COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.新冠疫情与5G阴谋论:基于推特数据的社交网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19458. doi: 10.2196/19458.
7
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy on Social Media: Building a Public Twitter Data Set of Antivaccine Content, Vaccine Misinformation, and Conspiracies.社交媒体上对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫:构建一个关于反疫苗内容、疫苗错误信息和阴谋论的公共 Twitter 数据集。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 17;7(11):e30642. doi: 10.2196/30642.
8
Temporal and Location Variations, and Link Categories for the Dissemination of COVID-19-Related Information on Twitter During the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak in Europe: Infoveillance Study.欧洲SARS-CoV-2疫情期间推特上新冠疫情相关信息传播的时间和地点变化以及链接类别:信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 28;22(8):e19629. doi: 10.2196/19629.
9
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: insights from patient-generated data on social media.COVID-19 大流行对风湿和肌肉骨骼疾病患者的影响:社交媒体上患者生成数据的见解。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Oct 9;60(SI):SI77-SI84. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab174.
10
Conversations and Medical News Frames on Twitter: Infodemiological Study on COVID-19 in South Korea.推特上的对话与医学新闻框架:韩国新冠肺炎信息流行病学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 5;22(5):e18897. doi: 10.2196/18897.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review of Physician Advocacy on Twitter.关于推特上医生宣传活动的范围综述
Cureus. 2023 Jul 10;15(7):e41632. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41632. eCollection 2023 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of Social Media in the Practice of Medicine.社交媒体在医学实践中的应用。
Am J Med. 2022 Feb;135(2):138-140. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.08.030. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
2
Demographics and topics impact on the co-spread of COVID-19 misinformation and fact-checks on Twitter.人口统计学和话题对推特上新冠疫情错误信息与事实核查的共同传播产生影响。
Inf Process Manag. 2021 Nov;58(6):102732. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102732. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
3
Infected blood inquiry in the UK.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;21(8):1078-1079. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00411-4.
4
Declining well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic reveals US social inequities.新冠疫情期间幸福感下降揭示了美国的社会不平等。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 8;16(7):e0254114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254114. eCollection 2021.
5
Harnessing Twitter to empower scientific engagement and communication: The ISTH 2020 virtual congress experience.利用推特增强科学参与和交流:国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)2020年虚拟大会的经验
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021 Mar 8;5(2):253-260. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12478. eCollection 2021 Feb.
6
Navigating a new terrain: how Twitter is changing hematologists.探索新领域:推特如何改变血液学家。
Blood Adv. 2021 Jan 12;5(1):277-278. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020004030.
7
Social Media Insights Into US Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Analysis of Twitter Data.社交媒体洞察美国在 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理健康状况:对 Twitter 数据的纵向分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 14;22(12):e21418. doi: 10.2196/21418.
8
Ten simple rules for getting started on Twitter as a scientist.科学家在推特上起步的十条简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Feb 10;16(2):e1007513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007513. eCollection 2020 Feb.
9
Social media usage among health care providers.医疗保健提供者对社交媒体的使用情况。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Nov 29;10(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2993-y.
10
Hearing loss on social media: Who is winning hearts and minds?社交媒体上的听力损失问题:谁能赢得人心?
Laryngoscope. 2018 Jun;128(6):1453-1461. doi: 10.1002/lary.26902. Epub 2017 Oct 8.

数字血友病:社交媒体在血友病护理、研究和宣传中的应用洞察。

Digital haemophilia: Insights into the use of social media for haemophilia care, research and advocacy.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Haemophilia. 2022 Mar;28(2):247-253. doi: 10.1111/hae.14510. Epub 2022 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1111/hae.14510
PMID:35167716
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8917073/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The haemophilia community on Twitter is diverse, consisting of advocacy groups, patients, physicians, researchers and other users. However, the scope of this community is uncharacterized, and limited data is available regarding effective participation in this community.

AIM

To assess the types of users active in the haemophilia community on Twitter, as well as major themes present in haemophilia-related tweets.

METHODS

Forty-nine thousand five hundred and twelve tweets between September 2019 and September 2021 were classified using regular expressions. A subset of the classified tweets was manually analysed to identify prevalent discussion themes.

RESULTS

Among the top 250 users by post count, the largest categories of users were support and advocacy groups, people with bleeding disorders and healthcare providers. The largest thematic categories of tweets were gene therapy, contaminated haemophilia blood products, haemophilia research, clinical management of haemophilia and COVID-19. While misinformation was rare, negative and incorrect perceptions of haemophilia were present among the general public.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate patterns of effective Twitter usage for patient care, research and advocacy purposes among the haemophilia community.

摘要

简介

Twitter 上的血友病社区多种多样,其中包括宣传团体、患者、医生、研究人员和其他用户。然而,该社区的范围尚未确定,并且关于在该社区中有效参与的相关数据有限。

目的

评估在 Twitter 上活跃的血友病社区的用户类型,以及与血友病相关推文的主要主题。

方法

使用正则表达式对 2019 年 9 月至 2021 年 9 月期间的 49512 条推文进行分类。对分类推文的子集进行手动分析,以确定常见的讨论主题。

结果

在按发帖数排名前 250 的用户中,最大的用户类别是支持和宣传团体、有出血性疾病的人和医疗保健提供者。推文的最大主题类别是基因治疗、受污染的血友病血液制品、血友病研究、血友病的临床管理和 COVID-19。虽然错误信息很少,但公众对血友病存在负面和不正确的看法。

结论

我们的结果表明,血友病社区在患者护理、研究和宣传方面有效利用了 Twitter。