Suppr超能文献

东亚人的 T 分数用于骨质疏松症的诊断时,应使用基于种族和性别的特定 BMD 参考范围进行计算:理由。

East Asians' T-scores for the diagnosis of osteoporosis should be calculated using ethnicity- and gender-specific BMD reference ranges: justifications.

机构信息

Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, SAR, China.

School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Skeletal Radiol. 2024 Mar;53(3):409-417. doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04423-3. Epub 2023 Aug 11.

Abstract

The 2013 ISCD consensus recommended a Caucasian female reference database for T-score calculation in men, which says "A uniform Caucasian (non-race adjusted) female reference database should be used to calculate T-scores for men of all ethnic groups." However, this statement was recommended for the US population, and no position was taken with respect to BMD reference data or ethnicity matching outside of the USA. In East Asia, currently, a Japanese BMD reference database is universally adopted in Japan for clinical DXA diagnosis, while both local BMD and Caucasian BMD reference databases are in use in Mainland China, South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore. In this article, we argue that an ethnicity- and gender-specific BMD database should be used for T-score calculations for East Asians, and we list the justifications why we advocate so. Use of a Caucasian BMD reference database leads to systematically lower T-scores for East Asians and an overestimation of the prevalence of osteoporosis. Using a female BMD reference database to calculate T-scores for male patients leads to higher T-score values and an underestimation of the prevalence of osteoporosis. Epidemiological evidence does not support using a female BMD reference database to calculate T-scores for men. We also note that BMD reference databases collected in Asia should be critically evaluated for their quality.

摘要

2013 年 ISCD 共识建议使用白人女性参考数据库来计算男性的 T 评分,该共识指出“应使用统一的白人(非种族调整)女性参考数据库来计算所有族裔男性的 T 评分”。然而,这一建议仅针对美国人群,对于美国以外的 BMD 参考数据或种族匹配问题,共识并未给出立场。在东亚地区,目前日本在临床 DXA 诊断中普遍采用日本的 BMD 参考数据库,而中国大陆、韩国、中国台湾地区和新加坡则同时使用当地的 BMD 参考数据库和白人 BMD 参考数据库。在本文中,我们认为,应该为东亚人使用特定种族和性别的 BMD 数据库来计算 T 评分,并列出了我们之所以主张这一点的理由。使用白人 BMD 参考数据库会导致对东亚人的 T 评分系统偏低,并高估骨质疏松症的患病率。使用女性 BMD 参考数据库来计算男性患者的 T 评分会导致 T 评分值偏高,并低估骨质疏松症的患病率。流行病学证据不支持使用女性 BMD 参考数据库来计算男性的 T 评分。我们还注意到,亚洲收集的 BMD 参考数据库应受到严格评估,以确保其质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验