Ebrahimi Saeid, Marzaleh Milad Ahmadi, Zakerabbasali Somayeh, Ahmadi Ahmad, Sarpourian Fatemeh
Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Telemed J E Health. 2024 Feb;30(2):307-320. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0258. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
The use of telerehabilitation for the treatment of speech and language disorders in the field of hearing is increasing. A comprehensive study comparing telerehabilitation's effectiveness with traditional rehabilitation can help us understand it better. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to compare the effectiveness of telerehabilitation with traditional rehabilitation for speech and language disorders in children with hearing disabilities in 2023. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane, Scopus, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and the Web of Science from 2000 to February 28, 2023. The articles were selected based on keywords, determined criteria, and reviewed in terms of title, abstract, and full text. Finally, articles that were relevant to our aim were evaluated. The initial search resulted in the extraction of 1,788 articles. After reviewing the articles and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, nine articles were selected for analysis. Four (44.44%) and 3 (33.33%) studies were case-control and quasi-experimental studies, respectively. Four (44.44%) studies were conducted in the United States. SPSS, Preschool Language Scales, fifth edition (PLS-5), and microphone were the most common tools, each of which included 4 (44.44%), 3 (33.33%), and (333.33%) studies. Traditional rehabilitation and telerehabilitation can effectively improve the speech and language skills of children with hearing disabilities. However, it is always suggested to use traditional rehabilitation first to achieve better results.
远程康复在听力领域治疗言语和语言障碍方面的应用正在增加。一项比较远程康复与传统康复效果的综合研究有助于我们更好地理解它。因此,本系统评价旨在比较2023年远程康复与传统康复对听力残疾儿童言语和语言障碍的疗效。于2000年至2023年2月28日在PubMed、PubMed Central、Cochrane、Scopus、谷歌学术、科学Direct和科学网进行了系统检索。根据关键词、既定标准选择文章,并从标题、摘要和全文方面进行评审。最后,对与我们目标相关的文章进行评估。初步检索共提取了1788篇文章。在对文章进行评审并应用纳入和排除标准后,选择了9篇文章进行分析。分别有4项(44.44%)和3项(33.33%)研究为病例对照研究和准实验研究。4项(44.44%)研究在美国进行。SPSS、《学前语言量表》第五版(PLS - 5)和麦克风是最常用的工具,每项工具分别包含4项(44.44%)、3项(33.33%)和3项(33.33%)研究。传统康复和远程康复均可有效提高听力残疾儿童的言语和语言技能。然而,始终建议首先使用传统康复以取得更好的效果。