Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Preventive Medicine (Biostatistics), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2024 Jan-Feb;7(1):37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2023.08.002. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
To compare outcomes of early aqueous suppression (EAS) and standard therapy (ST) after Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) implantation for uveitic glaucoma.
Retrospective comparative cohort study.
All patients with uveitic glaucoma underwent AGV implantation from January 2010 to October 2020 at Northwestern Medicine.
Excluding the first postoperative day 1 (POD1), only eyes with IOP 10-15 mmHg at their first visit with IOP ≥ 10 mmHg were included in the main analysis. Early aqueous suppression (EAS) was defined as initiation of ocular hypotensive therapy when IOP was first 10-15 mmHg. Standard therapy was initiation of therapy at any later time. Failure was defined as IOP > 21 mmHg, < 5 mmHg, or < 20% reduction in IOP from baseline after 3 months, for 2 consecutive study visits. Hypotony was defined as IOP ≤ 5 mmHg for ≥ 2 visits. Hypertensive phase was defined as IOP > 21 mmHg for 2 consecutive visits in the first 3 months.
Proportion achieving overall success; incidence of hypotony and hypertensive phase.
Twenty-eight eyes of 26 patients were in the EAS group and 20 eyes of 19 patients were in the ST group, with a mean follow-up of 17.7 and 28.2 months, respectively. Baseline IOP was similar in the EAS (31.2 ± 10.1 mmHg) and ST (34.6 ± 12.2 mmHg) groups; P = 0.18. Final IOP was lower in the EAS group (12.9 ± 4.6 mmHg) than the ST group (16.4 ± 5.7 mmHg; P = 0.02) on 2.6 ± 0.9 medications in the EAS group and 1.8 ± 1.5 in the ST group (P = 0.07). Overall success was achieved in 87% of EAS eyes and 74% of ST eyes (P = 0.43). There were no statistically significant differences in the occurrence of additional glaucoma surgery (4% for EAS, 20% for ST; P = 0.11), hypotony (7% for EAS, 0% for ST; P = 0.50), or hypertensive phase (4% for EAS, 21% for ST; P = 0.09).
EAS was associated with a lower final IOP after AGV in uveitic glaucoma eyes; however, more medications were in use at the final visit. No statistically significant differences in overall success or the incidence of adverse events were observed.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
比较 Ahmed Glaucoma Valve(AGV)植入术后早期房水抑制(EAS)与标准治疗(ST)治疗葡萄膜炎性青光眼的结果。
回顾性比较队列研究。
2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 10 月在西北医学中心接受 AGV 植入的所有葡萄膜炎性青光眼患者。
排除术后第 1 天(POD1),仅纳入首次就诊时眼压(IOP)为 10-15mmHg 且 IOP≥10mmHg 的眼进入主要分析。早期房水抑制(EAS)定义为眼压首次达到 10-15mmHg 时开始使用眼部降压治疗。标准治疗是在任何更晚的时间开始治疗。失败定义为 3 个月内连续 2 次就诊时眼压>21mmHg、<5mmHg 或较基线眼压降低<20%。低眼压定义为眼压≤5mmHg 持续 2 次或以上。高血压期定义为前 3 个月内连续 2 次就诊时眼压>21mmHg。
总成功率的比例;低眼压和高血压期的发生率。
26 例患者的 28 只眼为 EAS 组,19 例患者的 20 只眼为 ST 组,平均随访时间分别为 17.7 和 28.2 个月。EAS(31.2±10.1mmHg)和 ST(34.6±12.2mmHg)组的基线眼压相似;P=0.18。EAS 组的最终眼压(12.9±4.6mmHg)低于 ST 组(16.4±5.7mmHg;P=0.02),EAS 组使用 2.6±0.9 种药物,ST 组使用 1.8±1.5 种药物(P=0.07)。EAS 组 87%的眼和 ST 组 74%的眼达到总体成功(P=0.43)。EAS 组(4%)和 ST 组(20%)行额外青光眼手术的发生率无统计学差异(P=0.11),低眼压发生率(EAS 组 7%,ST 组 0%;P=0.50)和高血压期发生率(EAS 组 4%,ST 组 21%;P=0.09)也无统计学差异。
EAS 与 AGV 治疗葡萄膜炎性青光眼眼后眼压较低有关;然而,在最后一次就诊时使用了更多的药物。在总体成功率和不良事件发生率方面未观察到统计学差异。
在本文末尾的脚注和披露中可能发现专有或商业披露信息。