• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

墨西哥烟草的排挤效应和贫困效应。

Crowding out and impoverishing effect of tobacco in Mexico.

机构信息

Centro de Investigación Económica y Presupuestaria, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico

Centro de Investigación Económica y Presupuestaria, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s68-s74. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057791.

DOI:10.1136/tc-2022-057791
PMID:37567601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11187352/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Tobacco is one of the world's largest preventable causes of premature death, accounting for more than 8 million deaths and costing the global economy US$1.4 trillion each year. Smoking is a global problem with 1.3 billion people using tobacco worldwide, who will face harmful effects on health and on people's current and future financial situations and quality of life.This article aims to be the first study to generate evidence on the effects of smoking on household expenditure and the number of people living under the poverty threshold by studying the crowding out and impoverishing effect in Mexico.

METHODS

Through econometric methods and maximising a household utility function we estimate the crowding out and impoverishing effect of tobacco consumption in México based on household's income and spending survey from 2020.

RESULTS

Spending on tobacco crowds out household spending on other goods and services. In Mexico, spending on tobacco results in decreased spending on essential goods and services, like education and healthcare, and increased spending on harmful goods such as alcoholic beverages. These effects are common across all income levels but are more pronounced in low-income households. When spending on tobacco increases, for example, following regular price increases made by the tobacco industry, the crowding out effect is exacerbated.In addition, smoking has an impoverishing effect on the population. This is because some families find that their remaining income level falls below the poverty line after deducting money spent on tobacco (a concept known as secondary poverty). In Mexico, 909 132 people are left with a disposable income level below the extreme poverty line because of expenditure on tobacco and smoking-related diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking affects individual health and the finances of households in Mexico, particularly those of low-income people. By increasing tobacco taxes, those who quit smoking increase their quality of life and well-being. However, those who continue to smoke and increase their tobacco spending are affected by a shift in their spending on other goods and services.The increase in tobacco taxes must be accompanied by public policies that help reduce tobacco consumption and compensate the crowding out on goods and services relevant to the development of households.

摘要

简介

烟草是全球可预防的导致过早死亡的最大原因之一,每年造成超过 800 万人死亡,耗费全球经济 1.4 万亿美元。吸烟是一个全球性问题,全球有 13 亿人使用烟草,他们将面临健康危害以及当前和未来经济状况和生活质量的下降。本文旨在通过研究墨西哥的挤出和致贫效应,成为第一项研究吸烟对家庭支出和贫困人口数量影响的证据。

方法

通过计量经济学方法和最大化家庭效用函数,我们根据 2020 年家庭收入和支出调查,估计了墨西哥烟草消费的挤出和致贫效应。

结果

烟草消费挤出了家庭对其他商品和服务的支出。在墨西哥,烟草支出导致教育和医疗保健等基本商品和服务支出减少,而酒精等有害商品支出增加。这些影响在所有收入水平都很常见,但在低收入家庭中更为明显。例如,随着烟草行业的定期涨价,烟草支出增加,挤出效应加剧。此外,吸烟对人口有致贫效应。这是因为一些家庭发现,扣除烟草支出(称为二级贫困)后,其剩余收入水平低于贫困线。在墨西哥,由于烟草支出和与吸烟相关的疾病,有 909132 人可支配收入水平低于极端贫困线。

结论

吸烟影响墨西哥个人健康和家庭经济,特别是低收入人群。通过提高烟草税,戒烟者提高了生活质量和幸福感。然而,那些继续吸烟和增加烟草支出的人会受到支出转移到其他商品和服务的影响。增加烟草税必须辅以帮助减少烟草消费和补偿家庭发展相关商品挤出的公共政策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b90d/11187352/7b095fce31a3/tc-2022-057791f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b90d/11187352/7b095fce31a3/tc-2022-057791f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b90d/11187352/7b095fce31a3/tc-2022-057791f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Crowding out and impoverishing effect of tobacco in Mexico.墨西哥烟草的排挤效应和贫困效应。
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s68-s74. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057791.
2
The Impoverishing Effect of Tobacco Use in Indonesia.烟草使用对印度尼西亚的贫困化效应。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Sep 23;26(10):1331-1338. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae088.
3
Crowding-out effect of tobacco consumption in Indonesia.印度尼西亚烟草消费的挤出效应。
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s81-s87. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057843.
4
Equity implications of tobacco taxation: results from WHO FCTC investment cases.烟草税的公平性影响:来自世卫组织《烟草控制框架公约》投资案例的结果。
Tob Control. 2024 May 2;33(Suppl 1):s27-s33. doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058338.
5
The impact of tobacco expenditures on spending within Turkish households.烟草消费支出对土耳其家庭内部支出的影响。
Tob Control. 2016 Sep;25(5):558-63. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052000. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
6
Cigarette prices, cigarette expenditure and smoking-induced deprivation: findings from the International Tobacco Control Mexico survey.香烟价格、香烟支出和吸烟导致的贫困:来自墨西哥国际烟草控制调查的发现。
Tob Control. 2013 Jul;22(4):223-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050613. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
7
Progress on impoverishing health spending in 122 countries: a retrospective observational study.122 个国家卫生支出减少的进展:回顾性观察研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Feb;6(2):e180-e192. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30486-2. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
8
Crowding-out effect of tobacco consumption in Serbia.塞尔维亚烟草消费的排挤效应。
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s88-s94. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057727.
9
The heterogeneous impact of a successful tobacco control campaign: a case study of Mauritius.成功的控烟运动的异质性影响:以毛里求斯为例。
Tob Control. 2018 Jan;27(1):83-89. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053412. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
10
The health and economic burden of smoking in 12 Latin American countries and the potential effect of increasing tobacco taxes: an economic modelling study.12 个拉丁美洲国家的吸烟带来的健康和经济负担,以及提高烟草税的潜在影响:一项经济建模研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Oct;8(10):e1282-e1294. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30311-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Cigarette consumption from a life-course perspective in low- and middle-income countries.从中低收入国家的生命历程视角看香烟消费情况
Bull World Health Organ. 2025 Sep 1;103(9):541-549. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.292918. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
2
The dual impact of tobacco spending: crowding out essentials and crowding in addictive behaviors.烟草消费的双重影响:挤出必需品并挤入成瘾行为。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 9;15(1):24648. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08648-1.
3
Tobacco and household expenditure in Egypt: insights into socioeconomic inequalities and spending profiles from the Household Income, Expenditure and Consumption Survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Inequality of the crowding-out effect of tobacco expenditure in Colombia.哥伦比亚烟草支出挤出效应的不平等性。
PLoS One. 2024 May 21;19(5):e0303328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303328. eCollection 2024.
2
Tobacco Taxes as the Unsung Hero: Impact of a Tax Increase on Advancing Sustainable Development in Colombia.烟草税:无名英雄——提高哥伦比亚税收对可持续发展的影响。
Int J Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;67:1604353. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604353. eCollection 2022.
3
The impact of tobacco tax reforms on poverty in Mexico.烟草税改革对墨西哥贫困状况的影响。
埃及的烟草与家庭支出:基于家庭收入、支出和消费调查对社会经济不平等及支出概况的洞察
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 13;25(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21676-w.
4
From capacity building to collaboration in tobacco economics research.从烟草经济学研究的能力建设到合作
Tob Control. 2024 Jun 4;33(Suppl 2):s34-s37. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057821.
5
Inequality of the crowding-out effect of tobacco expenditure in Colombia.哥伦比亚烟草支出挤出效应的不平等性。
PLoS One. 2024 May 21;19(5):e0303328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303328. eCollection 2024.
SN Bus Econ. 2021;1(10):142. doi: 10.1007/s43546-021-00141-x. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
4
Crowding-out effect of tobacco expenditure in Vietnam.越南烟草支出的挤出效应。
Tob Control. 2020 Nov;29(Suppl 5):s326-s330. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055307. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
5
The crowding-out effect of tobacco expenditure on household spending patterns in Bangladesh.烟草支出对孟加拉国家庭支出模式的挤出效应。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 9;13(10):e0205120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205120. eCollection 2018.
6
Relationship between smoking and health and education spending in Chile.智利的吸烟与健康及教育支出之间的关系。
Tob Control. 2018 Sep;27(5):560-567. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053857. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
7
Tobacco use and household expenditures on food, education, and healthcare in low- and middle-income countries: a multilevel analysis.低收入和中等收入国家的烟草使用与家庭在食品、教育和医疗保健方面的支出:一项多层次分析
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 31;15:1098. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2423-9.
8
Counting 15 million more poor in India, thanks to tobacco.由于烟草,印度贫困人口增加了 1500 万。
Tob Control. 2011 Sep;20(5):349-52. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.040089. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
9
Hungry for tobacco: an analysis of the economic impact of tobacco consumption on the poor in Bangladesh.渴望烟草:孟加拉国烟草消费对穷人经济影响的分析
Tob Control. 2001 Sep;10(3):212-7. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.3.212.