Centro de Salud de los Corrales de Buelna, Servicio Cántabro de Salud, Los Corrales de Buelna, Spain.
Centro de Salud Cotolino, Servicio Cántabro de Salud, Castro Urdiales, Spain.
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 11;13(1):13086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40213-6.
The electronic prescription refill rate (EPRR) of 183 consecutive patients was determined over a 19-month retrospective study period, divided into 7 months PRE (Sep-19 to Mar-20) and 12 months POST pandemic (Apr-20 to Mar-21), in order to compare adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with asthma prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Before the pandemic (PRE), an average of 0.58 inhalers/month were refill from the pharmacy; [SD 0.33], very similar to the 0.59 inhalers/month; [SD 0.34] retrieved during the 12 subsequent months since the pandemic (POST) (p = 0.768). EPRR showed no differences (p = 0.784). When EPRR was dichotomous or ordinal categorised no differences were found either (p = 0.851 and 0.928), even when McNemar's test was used (p = 0.949), with prevalences of nonadherence (EPRR < 80%) of 57 and 58% respectively. Our results do not support increased adherence to inhaler treatment in terms of EPRR, comparing before and since COVID-19 pandemic. Compliance with prescription remains suboptimal.
在一项为期 19 个月的回顾性研究期间,确定了 183 名连续患者的电子处方续方率(EPRR),分为 7 个月的 PRE(19 年 9 月至 20 年 3 月)和 12 个月的 POST 大流行(20 年 4 月至 21 年 3 月),以比较哮喘患者在大流行之前和期间对吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)的依从性。在大流行之前(PRE),从药房平均每 0.58 支/月续方[SD 0.33],与大流行后 12 个月内平均每 0.59 支/月[SD 0.34]相似(p = 0.768)。EPRR 没有差异(p = 0.784)。当 EPRR 分为二项式或有序分类时,也没有发现差异(p = 0.851 和 0.928),即使使用 McNemar 检验(p = 0.949),不依从性(EPRR <80%)的患病率分别为 57%和 58%。我们的结果不支持 EPRR 方面对吸入器治疗的依从性增加,比较大流行前后。处方的依从性仍然不理想。