School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Mar;26(3):574-583. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03302-6. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
Renal cell carcinoma accounts for two to three percent of adult malignancies and can lead to inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis. This condition can decrease the rate of 5-year survival for patients to 60%. The treatment of choice in such cases is radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava thrombectomy. This surgery is one of the most challenging due to many perioperative complications. There are many controversial methods reported in the literature. Achieving the free of tumor IVC wall and the possibility of thrombectomy in cases of level III and level IV IVC thrombosis are two essential matters previously advocated open approaches. Nevertheless, open approaches are being replaced by minimally invasive techniques despite the difficulty of the surgical management of IVC thrombectomy. This paper aims to review recent evidence about new surgical methods and a comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches. In this review, we present the latest surgical strategies for IVC thrombectomy and compare open and minimally invasive approaches to achieve the optimal surgical technique. Due to the different anatomy of the left and right kidneys and variable extension of venous thrombosis, we investigate surgical methods for left and right kidney cancer and each level of IVC venous thrombosis separately.
肾细胞癌占成人恶性肿瘤的 2%至 3%,可导致下腔静脉(IVC)血栓形成。这种情况会使患者 5 年生存率降低至 60%。在这种情况下,首选的治疗方法是根治性肾切除术和下腔静脉血栓切除术。由于围手术期并发症较多,该手术是最具挑战性的手术之一。文献中有许多有争议的方法。在之前提倡开放方法的情况下,实现无肿瘤 IVC 壁和 III 级和 IV 级 IVC 血栓形成病例中血栓切除术的可能性是两个重要事项。尽管 IVC 血栓切除术的手术管理困难,但开放方法正在被微创技术所取代。本文旨在回顾关于新手术方法的最新证据,并比较开放、腹腔镜和机器人方法。在这篇综述中,我们介绍了 IVC 血栓切除术的最新手术策略,并比较了开放和微创方法,以实现最佳的手术技术。由于左右肾脏的解剖结构不同,静脉血栓形成的程度也不同,我们分别研究了左、右肾癌和每一级 IVC 静脉血栓形成的手术方法。