Azevedo José Moreira, Panteleimonitis Sofoklis, Mišković Danilo, Herrando Ignacio, Al-Dhaheri Mahmood, Ahmad Mukhtar, Qureshi Tahseen, Fernandez Laura Melina, Harper Mick, Parvaiz Amjad
Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasilia, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz MB, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 25;15(15):3760. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153760.
The quality of care of patients receiving colorectal resections has conventionally relied on individual metrics. When discussing with patients what these outcomes mean, they often find them confusing or overwhelming. Textbook oncological outcome (TOO) is a composite measure that summarises all the 'desirable' or 'ideal' postoperative clinical and oncological outcomes from both a patient's and doctor's point of view. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of TOO in patients receiving robotic colorectal cancer surgery in five robotic colorectal units and understand the risk factors associated with failure to achieve a TOO in these patients.
We present a retrospective, multicentric study with data from a prospectively collected database. All consecutive patients receiving robotic colorectal cancer resections from five centres between 2013 and 2022 were included. Patient characteristics and short-term clinical and oncological data were collected. A TOO was achieved when all components were realized-no conversion to open, no complication with a Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥ 3, length of hospital stay ≤ 14, no 30-day readmission, no 30-day mortality, and R0 resection. The main outcome measure was a composite measure of "ideal" practice called textbook oncological outcomes.
A total of 501 patients submitted to robotic colorectal cancer resection were included. Of the 501 patients included, 388 (77.4%) achieved a TOO. Four patients were converted to open (0.8%); 55 (11%) had LOS > 14 days; 46 (9.2%) had a CD ≥ 3 complication; 30-day readmission rate was 6% (30); 30-day mortality was 0.2% (1); and 480 (95.8%) had an R0 resection. Abdominoperineal resection was a risk factor for not achieving a TOO.
Robotic colorectal cancer surgery in robotic centres achieves a high TOO rate. Abdominoperineal resection is a risk factor for failure to achieve a TOO. This measure may be used in future audits and to inform patients clearly on success of treatment.
接受结直肠癌切除术患者的护理质量传统上依赖于个体指标。在与患者讨论这些结果意味着什么时,他们常常觉得这些指标令人困惑或难以理解。教科书式肿瘤学结局(TOO)是一种综合指标,从患者和医生的角度总结了所有“理想的”术后临床和肿瘤学结局。本研究旨在评估五个机器人结直肠手术单元中接受机器人辅助结直肠癌手术患者的TOO发生率,并了解这些患者未达到TOO的相关危险因素。
我们进行了一项回顾性多中心研究,数据来自前瞻性收集的数据库。纳入2013年至2022年间五个中心所有连续接受机器人辅助结直肠癌切除术的患者。收集患者特征以及短期临床和肿瘤学数据。当所有指标均达成时即实现了TOO,这些指标包括:未转为开放手术、Clavien-Dindo(CD)分级≥3级的并发症、住院时间≤14天、30天内无再入院、30天内无死亡以及R0切除。主要结局指标是一种名为教科书式肿瘤学结局的“理想”实践的综合指标。
共纳入501例行机器人辅助结直肠癌切除术的患者。在纳入的501例患者中,388例(77.4%)实现了TOO。4例患者转为开放手术(0.8%);55例(11%)住院时间>14天;46例(9.2%)发生CD≥3级并发症;30天再入院率为6%(30例);30天死亡率为0.2%(1例);480例(95.8%)实现了R0切除。腹会阴联合切除术是未达到TOO的一个危险因素。
机器人结直肠手术中心的机器人辅助结直肠癌手术实现了较高的TOO率。腹会阴联合切除术是未达到TOO的危险因素。该指标可用于未来的审核,并向患者清楚告知治疗的成功率。