• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估癌症中心在结肠癌切除术治疗腺癌的教科书式肿瘤学结局方面的差异。

Assessment of Cancer Center Variation in Textbook Oncologic Outcomes Following Colectomy for Adenocarcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.

Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 395 W 12th Ave Ste 670, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Mar;25(3):775-785. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04767-4. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-020-04767-4
PMID:32779080
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traditional metrics may inadequately represent rates of attaining optimal oncologic care. We evaluated a composite "textbook oncologic outcome" (TOO) to assess the incidence of achieving an "optimal" clinical result after colon adenocarcinoma (CA) resection.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to identify patients undergoing colectomy for non-metastatic CA between 2010 and 2015. TOO was defined as a margin negative resection with an AJCC compliant lymph node evaluation, no prolonged length of stay (LOS) or 30-day readmission/mortality, as well as receipt of stage appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Among 170,120 patients who underwent colectomy at 1315 hospitals, 93,204 (54.8%) achieved TOO with large variations observed among facilities. While certain factors were achieved nearly universally (R0 margin, 95.6%; no 30-day mortality, 97.2%), avoidance of prolonged LOS (77.3%) and appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy (83.0%) were achieved less consistently. On multivariable analysis, Black race/ethnicity (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.80-0.85), Medicaid insurance (OR 0.64, 0.61-0.68), and low-volume facility (< 50/year) (OR 0.83, 0.77-0.89) were associated with decreased likelihood of TOO. Achievement of TOO was associated with improved long-term survival (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.44-0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Roughly one-half of patients undergoing resection of CA achieved an optimal clinical outcome. TOO may be a more useful quality metric to assess patient-centric composite outcomes following surgical procedures.

摘要

背景

传统指标可能无法充分反映获得最佳肿瘤治疗效果的比例。我们评估了一种综合的“教科书式肿瘤学结果”(TOO),以评估在结肠腺癌(CA)切除术后达到“最佳”临床结果的发生率。

方法

国家癌症数据库(NCDB)被查询以确定 2010 年至 2015 年期间接受非转移性 CA colectomy 的患者。TOO 被定义为边缘阴性的切除术,具有 AJCC 符合的淋巴结评估,没有延长的住院时间(LOS)或 30 天再入院/死亡率,以及接受适当的辅助化疗。

结果

在 1315 家医院接受 colectomy 的 170120 名患者中,93204 名(54.8%)达到了 TOO,各个机构之间存在很大差异。虽然某些因素几乎普遍实现(R0 边缘,95.6%;30 天内无死亡率,97.2%),但避免延长 LOS(77.3%)和适当的辅助化疗(83.0%)的实现则不那么一致。在多变量分析中,黑人种族/民族(OR 0.82,95%CI 0.80-0.85)、医疗补助保险(OR 0.64,0.61-0.68)和低容量设施(<50/年)(OR 0.83,0.77-0.89)与 TOO 发生的可能性降低相关。达到 TOO 与长期生存改善相关(HR 0.45;95%CI 0.44-0.46)。

结论

大约一半接受 CA 切除术的患者达到了最佳临床结果。TOO 可能是评估手术后以患者为中心的综合结果的更有用的质量指标。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Cancer Center Variation in Textbook Oncologic Outcomes Following Colectomy for Adenocarcinoma.评估癌症中心在结肠癌切除术治疗腺癌的教科书式肿瘤学结局方面的差异。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Mar;25(3):775-785. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04767-4. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
2
Racial disparities in the attainment of textbook oncologic outcomes following colectomy for colon cancer: a national cancer database cohort study.种族差异对结肠癌患者接受结肠癌根治术后获得肿瘤学治疗效果的影响:基于国家癌症数据库的队列研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Apr 27;409(1):140. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03330-y.
3
Assessment of textbook oncologic outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.评估胰腺腺癌胰十二指肠切除术后教科书式肿瘤学结局。
J Surg Oncol. 2020 May;121(6):936-944. doi: 10.1002/jso.25861. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
4
Impact of safety-net hospital burden on achievement of textbook oncologic outcomes following resection in for stage I-IV colorectal cancer.安全网医院负担对 I-IV 期结直肠癌切除术后实现教科书肿瘤学结局的影响。
J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb;129(2):284-296. doi: 10.1002/jso.27474. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
5
Surgical Approach to Transverse Colon Cancer: Analysis of Current Practice and Oncological Outcomes Using the National Cancer Database.横结肠癌的手术治疗:利用国家癌症数据库分析当前实践和肿瘤学结果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Mar 1;64(3):284-292. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001887.
6
Surgical treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma: Are we achieving textbook oncologic outcomes for our patients?胃腺癌的外科治疗:我们是否为患者实现了教科书式的肿瘤学治疗效果?
J Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;125(4):621-630. doi: 10.1002/jso.26778. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
7
Assessment of Textbook Oncologic Outcomes Following Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer.直肠癌直肠切除术后教科书式肿瘤学结局评估。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Jun;26(6):1286-1297. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05213-9. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
8
Impact of Textbook Oncologic Outcome Attainment on Survival After Gastrectomy: A Review of the National Cancer Database.教科书式肿瘤学结局达成对胃切除术患者生存的影响:国家癌症数据库综述。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8239-8248. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12388-1. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
9
Does minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy increase the chance of a textbook oncologic outcome?微创胰十二指肠切除术是否增加了获得标准肿瘤学治疗效果的机会?
Surgery. 2021 Sep;170(3):880-888. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.02.021. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
10
Impact of Minimally Invasive Approach on Attainment of a Textbook Oncologic Outcome Following Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Review of the National Cancer Database.微创方法对胃癌胃切除术后达到教科书式肿瘤学结局的影响:国家癌症数据库的回顾。
Am Surg. 2024 Apr;90(4):819-828. doi: 10.1177/00031348231212587. Epub 2023 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Textbook oncologic outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review.结直肠癌手术的教科书式肿瘤学结局:一项系统评价
Front Oncol. 2025 May 26;15:1474008. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1474008. eCollection 2025.
2
Racial disparities in the attainment of textbook oncologic outcomes following colectomy for colon cancer: a national cancer database cohort study.种族差异对结肠癌患者接受结肠癌根治术后获得肿瘤学治疗效果的影响:基于国家癌症数据库的队列研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Apr 27;409(1):140. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03330-y.
3
Achieving Textbook Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer Surgery Is Associated with Improved Long-Term Survival: Results of the Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Textbook Outcome: Nationwide Analysis of a Novel Quality Measure in Pancreatic Surgery.教科书式结果:胰腺手术新质量指标的全国性分析。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):155-162. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003451.
2
A Multi-institutional International Analysis of Textbook Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Curative-Intent Resection of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.多机构国际分析根治性切除肝内胆管细胞癌患者的教科书结局。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jun 1;154(6):e190571. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0571. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
3
Textbook Outcome: an Ordered Composite Measure for Quality of Bariatric Surgery.
结直肠癌手术达到教科书式的结果与长期生存率提高相关:多中心前瞻性队列研究结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 25;13(5):1304. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051304.
4
Textbook oncologic outcomes are associated with increased overall survival in patients with pancreatic head cancer after undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.教科书式的肿瘤学结果与接受腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术后的胰头癌患者总生存期延长相关。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb 6;22(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03322-8.
5
A novel study, textbook outcome in adrenalectomy: retrospective observational study in an endocrine surgical unit.一项新颖的研究,肾上腺切除术的教科书式结果:在内分泌外科病房的回顾性观察研究。
Updates Surg. 2024 Apr;76(2):565-571. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01756-z. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
6
Analysis of textbook outcomes for ampullary carcinoma patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy.胰十二指肠切除术后壶腹癌患者教科书式预后分析
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Oct 27;15(10):2259-2271. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2259.
7
Textbook Oncological Outcomes for Robotic Colorectal Cancer Resections: An Observational Study of Five Robotic Colorectal Units.机器人辅助结直肠癌切除术的教科书式肿瘤学结局:一项对五个机器人结直肠手术单元的观察性研究
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 25;15(15):3760. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153760.
8
The value of analyzing textbook outcomes after laparoscopic hepatectomy-a narrative review.腹腔镜肝切除术后分析教科书结果的价值——一项叙述性综述
Transl Cancer Res. 2023 Mar 31;12(3):631-637. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-2122. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
9
Achieving a Textbook Outcome in Colon Cancer Surgery Is Associated with Improved Long-Term Survival.实现结肠癌手术的“教科书式”结果与改善长期生存相关。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Feb 28;30(3):2879-2888. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30030220.
10
Assessment of Textbook Oncologic Outcomes Following Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer.直肠癌直肠切除术后教科书式肿瘤学结局评估。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Jun;26(6):1286-1297. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05213-9. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
教科书结局:减重手术质量的有序组合度量
Obes Surg. 2019 Apr;29(4):1287-1294. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03642-1.
4
Racial and Socioeconomic Differences in the Use of High-Volume Commission on Cancer-Accredited Hospitals for Cancer Surgery in the United States.美国癌症手术中高量肿瘤委员会认证医院使用的种族和社会经济差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 May;25(5):1116-1125. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6374-0. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
5
Procedure-Specific Trends in Surgical Outcomes.手术结果的特定程序趋势。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Jan;226(1):30-36.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.09.019. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
6
Textbook Outcome: A Composite Measure for Quality of Elective Aneurysm Surgery.教科书式结果:择期动脉瘤手术质量的综合衡量指标。
Ann Surg. 2017 Nov;266(5):898-904. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002388.
7
A cross-sectional study of patient and provider perception of "cure" as a goal of cancer surgery.一项关于患者和医疗服务提供者对“治愈”作为癌症手术目标的认知的横断面研究。
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Nov;114(6):677-683. doi: 10.1002/jso.24401. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
8
Role of frailty and sarcopenia in predicting outcomes among patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.衰弱和肌肉减少症在预测接受胃肠手术患者预后中的作用。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jan 27;8(1):27-40. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i1.27.
9
Inclusion of Sarcopenia Outperforms the Modified Frailty Index in Predicting 1-Year Mortality among 1,326 Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery for a Malignant Indication.在1326例因恶性指征接受胃肠手术的患者中,纳入肌少症在预测1年死亡率方面优于改良衰弱指数。
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Apr;222(4):397-407.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.020. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
10
Impact of Hospital Characteristics on Failure to Rescue Following Major Surgery.医院特征对大手术后抢救失败的影响。
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):692-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001414.