Wang Tianyu, Ding Weili, Chen Qing, Ding Zhongxiang
Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China.
Graduate School of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jul 27;13(15):2493. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152493.
Dual-energy CT (DECT) shows good performance in differentiating hemorrhage from contrast staining (CS). However, no guidelines have standardized the post-endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) examination time. We evaluated the value of performing DECT immediately and 24 h post-EVT in the diagnosis and prediction of hemorrhagic transformation (HT).
Two readers evaluated simulated conventional CT (sCCT) images compared with a second reading with DECT, establishing the diagnosis of HT immediately and 24 h post-EVT. Another reader's diagnosis 2-7 days post-EVT using non-contrast CT was identified as the final diagnostic criteria.
DECT performed immediately and 24 h post-EVT changed 22.4% (52/232) and 12.5% (29/232) of sCCT-based HT diagnoses, respectively (χ = 10.7, < 0.05). The sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of DECT performed immediately post-EVT for predicting the final diagnosis of HT were 33.6%, 58.9%, and 65.9%, respectively, whereas those for DECT performed 24 h post-EVT were 82.4%, 84.3%, and 90.9%, respectively (χ = 58.0, χ = 42.9, χ = 13.6; < 0.05). The specificity and positive predictive value were both 100.0%. Delayed HT occurred in 50.0% (78/156) and 42.2% (19/45) of patients with CS diagnosed immediately and 24 h post-EVT, respectively.
DECT performed immediately post-EVT changed a greater proportion of real-time HT diagnoses, whereas that performed 24 h post-EVT had higher sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy in predicting the final diagnosis of HT. A substantial proportion of patients with CS diagnosed at these two post-EVT timepoints subsequently developed delayed HT.
双能CT(DECT)在区分出血与对比剂染色(CS)方面表现良好。然而,尚无指南对血管内血栓清除术(EVT)后的检查时间进行标准化。我们评估了EVT后立即及24小时进行DECT检查在出血性转化(HT)诊断和预测中的价值。
两名阅片者将模拟传统CT(sCCT)图像与DECT二次阅片结果进行比较,在EVT后立即及24小时确立HT诊断。将另一名阅片者在EVT后2 - 7天使用非增强CT做出的诊断作为最终诊断标准。
EVT后立即及24小时进行的DECT分别改变了基于sCCT的HT诊断的22.4%(52/232)和12.5%(29/232)(χ = 10.7,<0.05)。EVT后立即进行的DECT预测HT最终诊断的敏感性、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性分别为33.6%、58.9%和65.9%,而EVT后24小时进行的DECT的相应值分别为82.4%、84.3%和90.9%(χ = 58.0,χ = 42.9,χ = 13.6;<0.05)。特异性和阳性预测值均为100.0%。在EVT后立即及24小时诊断为CS的患者中,分别有50.0%(78/156)和42.2%(19/45)发生了延迟性HT。
EVT后立即进行的DECT改变实时HT诊断的比例更大,而EVT后24小时进行的DECT在预测HT最终诊断方面具有更高的敏感性、NPV和准确性。在这两个EVT后时间点诊断为CS的患者中有相当比例随后发生了延迟性HT。