• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"Do Not Mix Apples with Oranges" to Avoid Misinterpretation of Placebo Effects in Manual Therapy: The Risk Is Resulting in a Fruit Basket. Comment on Molina-Àlvarez et al. Manual Therapy Effect in Placebo-Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2022, , 14021.“不要将苹果与橙子混淆”以避免对手法治疗中安慰剂效应的误解：风险在于产生一个“水果篮”。评 Molina-Àlvarez 等人的《安慰剂对照临床试验中手法治疗的效果：系统评价和荟萃分析》。2022,, 14021.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 26;20(15):6444. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156444.
2
Reply to Rossettini et al. "Do Not Mix Apples with Oranges" to Avoid Misinterpretation of Placebo Effects in Manual Therapy: The Risk Is Resulting in a Fruit Basket. Comment on "Molina-Álvarez et al. Manual Therapy Effect in Placebo-Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2022, , 14021".回复 Rossettini 等人：“不要将苹果与橙子混淆”以避免对手法治疗中安慰剂效应的误解：风险在于产生一篮水果。评论 Molina-Álvarez 等人：安慰剂对照试验中的手法治疗效果：系统评价和荟萃分析。2022，，14021。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 26;20(15):6445. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156445.
3
Lack of Rigour in the Review. Comment on Kuligowski et al. Manual Therapy in Cervical and Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review of the Literature. 2021, , 6176.评论 Kuligowski 等人的《颈椎和腰椎根性病变的手法治疗：文献系统评价》一文：缺乏严谨性。2021,, 6176.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 24;19(23):15613. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315613.
4
Comment on Rochmah et al. Economic Burden of Stroke Disease: A Systematic Review. 2021, , 7552.评论 Rochmah 等人的《卒中疾病的经济负担：系统评价》。2021 年， ，7552。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;19(7):4095. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074095.
5
Reply to Shaikh et al. Comment on "Rochmah et al. Economic Burden of Stroke Disease: A Systematic Review. 2021, , 7552".回复 Shaikh 等人对“Rochmah 等人。卒中疾病的经济负担：系统评价。2021 年， ，7552”的评论。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 2;19(7):4261. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074261.
6
One Cluster per Condition Is Not a Valid Design in Cluster-Randomized Trials. Comment on Wang et al. The Effect of Different Physical Exercise Programs on Physical Fitness among Preschool Children: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. 2023, , 4254.一因一果设计在整群随机对照试验中不适用。评 Wang 等人的《不同体育锻炼方案对学龄前儿童体质的影响：整群随机对照试验》一文。2023,, 4254.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 29;20(17):6673. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20176673.
7
Reply to Yigit, S.; Akinci, B. Comment on "Vázquez-Gandullo et al. Inspiratory Muscle Training in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) as Part of a Respiratory Rehabilitation Program Implementation of Mechanical Devices: A Systematic Review. 2022, , 5564".回复 Yigit, S.; Akinci, B. 对 "Vázquez-Gandullo 等人的评论：慢性阻塞性肺疾病（COPD）患者的吸气肌训练作为呼吸康复计划实施机械装置的一部分：系统评价。2022 年，，5564"。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 9;20(6):4801. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064801.
8
Comment on 'The importance of context (placebo effects) in conservative interventions for musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials' by Saueressig et al.对绍雷西格等人所著《背景（安慰剂效应）在肌肉骨骼疼痛保守干预中的重要性：随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析》的评论
Eur J Pain. 2024 May;28(5):855-856. doi: 10.1002/ejp.2242. Epub 2024 Jan 21.
9
Reply to Brzozek et al. Comment on "Choi et al. Cellular Phone Use and Risk of Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2020, , 8079".对布罗泽克等人的回复。对“崔等人。手机使用与肿瘤风险：系统评价与荟萃分析。2020年，，8079”的评论。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 24;18(11):5581. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115581.
10
Response to "Comment on 'The importance of context (placebo effects) in conservative interventions for musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials' by Saueressig et al.".对“Saueressig等人对‘保守干预治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛中背景（安慰剂效应）的重要性：随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析’的评论”的回应
Eur J Pain. 2024 May;28(5):857-858. doi: 10.1002/ejp.2252. Epub 2024 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Reply to Rossettini et al. "Do Not Mix Apples with Oranges" to Avoid Misinterpretation of Placebo Effects in Manual Therapy: The Risk Is Resulting in a Fruit Basket. Comment on "Molina-Álvarez et al. Manual Therapy Effect in Placebo-Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2022, , 14021".回复 Rossettini 等人：“不要将苹果与橙子混淆”以避免对手法治疗中安慰剂效应的误解：风险在于产生一篮水果。评论 Molina-Álvarez 等人：安慰剂对照试验中的手法治疗效果：系统评价和荟萃分析。2022，，14021。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 26;20(15):6445. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156445.

本文引用的文献

1
The importance of using placebo controls in nonpharmacological randomised trials.在非药物随机试验中使用安慰剂对照的重要性。
Pain. 2023 May 1;164(5):921-925. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002839. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
2
Avoiding nocebo and other undesirable effects in chiropractic, osteopathy and physiotherapy: An invitation to reflect.避免整脊疗法、骨疗法和物理疗法中的反安慰剂效应及其他不良影响：反思之邀。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022 Dec;62:102677. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102677. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
3
Manual Therapy Effect in Placebo-Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.手法治疗在安慰剂对照试验中的疗效：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;19(21):14021. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114021.
4
Differences between experimental and placebo arms in manual therapy trials: a methodological review.手法治疗试验中实验组与安慰剂组之间的差异：方法学综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Aug 8;22(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01704-8.
5
Sham treatment effects in manual therapy trials on back pain patients: a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis.手法治疗腰痛患者的假治疗效应：系统评价和成对荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 4;11(5):e045106. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045106.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明：系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
7
Sample size, study length, and inadequate controls were the most common self-acknowledged limitations in manual therapy trials: A methodological review.样本量、研究时长和对照不足是手法治疗试验中最常见的自我承认的局限性：方法学综述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:96-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.018. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
8
TIDieR-Placebo: A guide and checklist for reporting placebo and sham controls.TIDieR-Placebo：报告安慰剂和假对照的指南和检查表。
PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 21;17(9):e1003294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003294. eCollection 2020 Sep.
9
Can insights from placebo and nocebo mechanisms studies improve the randomized controlled trial?安慰剂和反安慰剂机制研究的启示能否改善随机对照试验？
Scand J Pain. 2020 Jul 28;20(3):451-467. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2019-0183.
10
A methodological review revealed that reporting of trials in manual therapy has not improved over time.方法学综述显示，手法治疗试验的报告质量并未随时间改善。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 May;121:32-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Jan 20.

“不要将苹果与橙子混淆”以避免对手法治疗中安慰剂效应的误解：风险在于产生一个“水果篮”。评 Molina-Àlvarez 等人的《安慰剂对照临床试验中手法治疗的效果：系统评价和荟萃分析》。2022,, 14021.

"Do Not Mix Apples with Oranges" to Avoid Misinterpretation of Placebo Effects in Manual Therapy: The Risk Is Resulting in a Fruit Basket. Comment on Molina-Àlvarez et al. Manual Therapy Effect in Placebo-Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2022, , 14021.

机构信息

School of Physiotherapy, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.

IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 26;20(15):6444. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20156444.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20156444
PMID:37568986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10418991/
Abstract

We read with interest the systematic review with the meta-analysis by Miguel Molina-Álvarez et al. [...].

摘要

我们饶有兴趣地阅读了 Miguel Molina-Álvarez 等人的系统评价和荟萃分析。