Yang Sen, Zhu Hongguang, Pang Sen, Ruan Zaijie, Lin Sinuo, Ding Yi, Cao Pengpeng, Shen Zhengyan
School of Mechanics & Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China.
Beijing Building Research Institute Corporation Limited of CSCEC, Beijing 100076, China.
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jul 30;16(15):5360. doi: 10.3390/ma16155360.
The strip filling method in underground reservoir needs high strength to achieve the requirements of water storage. In order to address the challenges associated with costly and weak filling materials, this study aimed to develop an economically efficient and high-strength gangue-based geopolymer backfill material (GBGBM). To achieve this, the Taguchi method was employed to design a series of 25 experiments, each consisting of four factors and five levels. This study focused on investigating the effects of different gangue gradation levels, sand ratios, water binder ratios (w/b), and aggregate binder ratios (a/b) on the working characteristics and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of the GBGBM. The optimal combination of the GBGBM was determined by employing a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N)-based extreme difference and variance analysis. The results revealed that the w/b ratio exerted the most substantial influence on both the slump and UCS. Specifically, when employing a gradation of 50%, a sand ratio of 55%, an a/b ratio of 2.5, and a w/b ratio of 0.64, the slump measured 251.2 mm, the UCS at 3d reached 5.27 MPa, and the UCS at 28d amounted to 17.65 MPa. These findings indicated a remarkable improvement in early UCS by 131.14% and the late UCS by 49.45% compared to gangue-based cement backfill material (GBCBM). Additionally, this study examined the hydration products and microstructures of both GBGBM and GBCBM using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) analyses. Significantly, the GBGBM exhibited notable advantages over the GBCBM, including a 78.16% reduction in CO emissions, a 73.45% decrease in energy consumption, and a 24.82% reduction in cost. These findings underscore the potential of GBGBM as a sustainable and cost-effective alternative to GBCBM.
地下水库的条带充填法需要高强度才能达到蓄水要求。为应对与昂贵且强度低的充填材料相关的挑战,本研究旨在开发一种经济高效且高强度的煤矸石基地质聚合物回填材料(GBGBM)。为此,采用田口方法设计了一系列25个实验,每个实验包含四个因素和五个水平。本研究着重调查不同煤矸石级配水平、砂率、水胶比(w/b)和骨料胶比(a/b)对GBGBM工作特性和无侧限抗压强度(UCS)的影响。通过基于信噪比(S/N)的极差和方差分析确定了GBGBM的最佳组合。结果表明,水胶比对坍落度和UCS的影响最大。具体而言,当采用50%的级配、55%的砂率、2.5的a/b比和0.64的w/b比时,坍落度为251.2毫米,3天的UCS达到5.27兆帕,28天的UCS为17.65兆帕。这些发现表明,与煤矸石基水泥回填材料(GBCBM)相比,早期UCS显著提高了131.14%,后期UCS提高了49.45%。此外,本研究使用X射线衍射(XRD)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和压汞孔隙率测定法(MIP)分析研究了GBGBM和GBCBM的水化产物和微观结构。值得注意的是,GBGBM相对于GBCBM表现出显著优势,包括二氧化碳排放量减少78.16%、能源消耗降低73.45%以及成本降低24.82%。这些发现凸显了GBGBM作为GBCBM的可持续且经济高效替代品的潜力。