Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2023 May;45(4):377-388. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2023.2245605. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
Apathy is common in many neurological, psychiatric, and medical disorders and is related to a number of important clinical outcomes. Nonetheless, research on apathy is hindered by different ways of defining and measuring it, which has led to heterogeneity in research findings.
The current study aimed to investigate the factor structure of apathy symptoms using a novel item pool. We examined whether the use of this item pool has incremental validity above and beyond a widely used measure in predicting cognition and everyday functioning. Participants included 249 informants who reported on an individual with (n = 210) or without (n = 39) a neurological or psychiatric condition.
Results showed the best fitting model of apathy symptoms was a bifactor model with apathy as a general dimension and three specific symptom factors including reduced interest and initiative, reduced emotional and verbal expression, and reduced social engagement. Incremental validity in predicting cognition was demonstrated for this more robust assessment of apathy symptoms.
Results are most aligned with one set of proposed diagnostic criteria for apathy which differs from other criteria in that it does not distinguish between cognitive and behavioral symptoms and includes a separate social dimension. Future research could aim to replicate this model in additional clinical samples and explore the incremental validity of the newly developed Apathy Symptom Inventory (ASI) in comparison to other recently developed measures.
冷漠在许多神经、精神和医学疾病中很常见,与许多重要的临床结果有关。尽管如此,由于对冷漠的定义和测量方式不同,研究受到了阻碍,这导致了研究结果的异质性。
本研究旨在使用新的项目池来研究冷漠症状的因素结构。我们研究了使用该项目池在预测认知和日常功能方面是否具有超越广泛使用的测量方法的增量有效性。参与者包括 249 名报告个体患有(n=210)或不患有(n=39)神经或精神疾病的知情者。
结果表明,冷漠症状的最佳拟合模型是双因素模型,冷漠是一般维度,有三个特定的症状因素,包括兴趣和主动性降低、情感和言语表达降低以及社会参与度降低。这种更可靠的冷漠症状评估显示出对认知的增量有效性。
结果与一套用于诊断冷漠的标准最为一致,这些标准与其他标准不同之处在于,它没有区分认知和行为症状,并且包括一个单独的社会维度。未来的研究可以旨在在其他临床样本中复制该模型,并探索新开发的冷漠症状量表(ASI)与其他最近开发的量表相比的增量有效性。