Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Medical Health Centre Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 11;8(8):CD002292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002292.pub4.
Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune blistering disease. Oral steroids are the standard treatment. We have updated this review, which was first published in 2002, because several new treatments have since been tried.
To assess the effects of treatments for bullous pemphigoid.
We updated searches of the following databases to November 2021: Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase. We searched five trial databases to January 2022, and checked the reference lists of included studies for further references to relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
RCTs of treatments for immunofluorescence-confirmed bullous pemphigoid.
At least two review authors, working independently, evaluated the studies against the review's inclusion criteria and extracted data from included studies. Using GRADE methodology, we assessed the certainty of the evidence for each outcome in each comparison. Our primary outcomes were healing of skin lesions and mortality.
We identified 14 RCTs (1442 participants). The main treatment modalities assessed were oral steroids, topical steroids, and the oral anti-inflammatory antibiotic doxycycline. Most studies reported mortality but adverse events and quality of life were not well reported. We decided to look at the primary outcomes 'disease control' and 'mortality'. Almost all studies investigated different comparisons; two studies were placebo-controlled. The results are therefore based on a single study for each comparison except azathioprine. Most studies involved only small numbers of participants. We assessed the risk of bias for all key outcomes as having 'some concerns' or high risk, due to missing data, inappropriate analysis, or insufficient information. Clobetasol propionate cream versus oral prednisone Compared to oral prednisone, clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body probably increases skin healing at day 21 (risk ratio (RR 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 1.13; 1 study, 341 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Skin healing at 21 days was seen in 99.8% of participants assigned to clobetasol and 92.4% of participants assigned to prednisone. Clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body compared to oral prednisone may reduce mortality at one year (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.01; 1 study, 341 participants; low-certainty evidence). Death occurred in 26.5% (45/170) of participants assigned to clobetasol and 36.3% (62/171) of participants assigned to oral prednisone. This study did not measure quality of life. Clobetasol propionate cream may reduce risk of severe complications by day 21 compared with oral prednisone (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.86; 1 study, 341 participants; low-certainty evidence). Mild clobetasol propionate cream regimen (10 to 30 g/day) versus standard clobetasol propionate cream regimen (40 g/day) A mild regimen of topical clobetasol propionate applied over the whole body compared to the standard regimen probably does not change skin healing at day 21 (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.03; 1 study, 312 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Both groups showed complete healing of lesions at day 21 in 98% participants. A mild regimen of topical clobetasol propionate applied over the whole body compared to the standard regimen may not change mortality at one year (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.32; 1 study, 312 participants; low-certainty evidence), which occurred in 118/312 (37.9%) participants. This study did not measure quality of life. A mild regimen of topical clobetasol propionate applied over the whole body compared to the standard regimen may not change adverse events at one year (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.14; 1 study, 309 participants; low-certainty evidence). Doxycycline versus prednisolone Compared to prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/day), doxycycline (200 mg/day) induces less skin healing at six weeks (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.92; 1 study, 213 participants; high-certainty evidence). Complete skin healing was reported in 73.8% of participants assigned to doxycycline and 91.1% assigned to prednisolone. Doxycycline compared to prednisolone probably decreases mortality at one year (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.89; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 14; 1 study, 234 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Mortality occurred in 2.4% (3/132) of participants with doxycycline and 9.7% (11/121) with prednisolone. Compared to prednisolone, doxycycline improved quality of life at one year (mean difference 1.8 points lower, which is more favourable on the Dermatology Life Quality Index, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.58 lower; 1 study, 234 participants; high-certainty evidence). Doxycycline compared to prednisolone probably reduces severe or life-threatening treatment-related adverse events at one year (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.99; 1 study, 234 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Prednisone plus azathioprine versus prednisone It is unclear whether azathioprine plus prednisone compared to prednisone alone affects skin healing or mortality because there was only very low-certainty evidence from two trials (98 participants). These studies did not measure quality of life. Adverse events were reported in a total of 20/48 (42%) participants assigned to azathioprine plus prednisone and 15/44 (34%) participants assigned to prednisone. Nicotinamide plus tetracycline versus prednisone It is unclear whether nicotinamide plus tetracycline compared to prednisone affects skin healing or mortality because there was only very low-certainty evidence from one trial (18 participants). This study did not measure quality of life. Fewer adverse events were reported in the nicotinamide group. Methylprednisolone plus azathioprine versus methylprednisolone plus dapsone It is unclear whether azathioprine plus methylprednisolone compared to dapsone plus methylprednisolone affects skin healing or mortality because there was only very low-certainty evidence from one trial (54 participants). This study did not measure quality of life. A total of 18 adverse events were reported in the azathioprine group and 13 in the dapsone group.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body is probably similarly effective as, and may cause less mortality than, oral prednisone for treating bullous pemphigoid. Lower-dose clobetasol propionate cream applied over the whole body is probably similarly effective as standard-dose clobetasol propionate cream and has similar mortality. Doxycycline is less effective but causes less mortality than prednisolone for treating bullous pemphigoid. Other treatments need further investigation.
大疱性类天疱疮(BP)是最常见的自身免疫性大疱性疾病。口服皮质类固醇是标准治疗方法。我们更新了这项于 2002 年首次发表的综述,因为此后已经尝试了几种新的治疗方法。
评估治疗大疱性类天疱疮的各种疗法的效果。
我们更新了对以下数据库的检索:Cochrane 皮肤专业注册库、CENTRAL、MEDLINE 和 Embase。截至 2021 年 11 月,我们检索了五个试验数据库,并检查了纳入研究的参考文献列表,以获取更多相关的随机对照试验(RCT)的信息。
针对免疫荧光证实的大疱性类天疱疮的治疗方法的 RCTs。
至少两名审查员独立评估研究是否符合综述的纳入标准,并从纳入的研究中提取数据。我们使用 GRADE 方法,根据每项比较中的每个结局评估证据的确定性。我们的主要结局是皮肤病变的愈合和死亡率。
我们确定了 14 项 RCT(1442 名参与者)。评估的主要治疗方法包括口服皮质类固醇、局部皮质类固醇和口服抗炎抗生素多西环素。大多数研究报告了死亡率,但不良事件和生活质量报告得并不充分。我们决定查看“疾病控制”和“死亡率”这两个主要结局。几乎所有的研究都调查了不同的比较;两项研究为安慰剂对照。因此,除了阿扎胞苷外,所有结果都是基于每个比较的单个研究。大多数研究仅涉及少数参与者。我们评估了所有关键结局的偏倚风险,认为由于数据缺失、不适当的分析或信息不足,这些研究都存在“一些担忧”或高风险。
与口服泼尼松龙相比,全身涂抹氯倍他索丙酸酯乳膏可能会增加第 21 天的皮肤愈合(风险比(RR)1.08,95%置信区间(CI)1.03 至 1.13;1 项研究,341 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。在接受氯倍他索和接受泼尼松龙的参与者中,分别有 99.8%和 92.4%的人在第 21 天实现了皮肤愈合。全身涂抹氯倍他索丙酸酯乳膏与口服泼尼松龙相比,可能会降低一年时的死亡率(RR 0.73,95%CI 0.53 至 1.01;1 项研究,341 名参与者;低确定性证据)。在接受氯倍他索的 170 名参与者中,有 26.5%(45/170)死亡,在接受泼尼松龙的 171 名参与者中,有 36.3%(62/171)死亡。这项研究没有测量生活质量。与口服泼尼松龙相比,氯倍他索丙酸酯乳膏可能会在第 21 天降低严重并发症的风险(RR 0.65,95%CI 0.50 至 0.86;1 项研究,341 名参与者;低确定性证据)。
低浓度氯倍他索丙酸酯乳膏方案(10 至 30 g/天)与标准氯倍他索丙酸酯乳膏方案(40 g/天):与标准方案相比,全身应用低浓度氯倍他索丙酸酯乳膏方案可能不会改变第 21 天的皮肤愈合(RR 1.00,95%CI 0.97 至 1.03;1 项研究,312 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。两组均有 98%的参与者在第 21 天完全愈合。与标准方案相比,全身应用低浓度氯倍他索丙酸酯乳膏方案可能不会改变一年时的死亡率(RR 1.00,95%CI 0.75 至 1.32;1 项研究,312 名参与者;低确定性证据),在接受氯倍他索的 312 名参与者中,有 118/312(37.9%)人发生了死亡。这项研究没有测量生活质量。与标准方案相比,全身应用低浓度氯倍他索丙酸酯乳膏方案可能不会改变一年时的不良事件(RR 0.94,95%CI 0.78 至 1.14;1 项研究,309 名参与者;低确定性证据)。
与泼尼松龙(0.5mg/kg/天)相比,多西环素(200mg/天)在六周时皮肤愈合较少(RR 0.81,95%CI 0.72 至 0.92;1 项研究,213 名参与者;高确定性证据)。接受多西环素的 73.8%的参与者和接受泼尼松龙的 91.1%的参与者完全愈合。与泼尼松龙相比,多西环素可能会降低一年时的死亡率(RR 0.25,95%CI 0.07 至 0.89;需要治疗的人数(NNTB)为 14;1 项研究,234 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。在接受多西环素的 2.4%(3/132)的参与者和接受泼尼松龙的 9.7%(11/121)的参与者中发生了死亡。与泼尼松龙相比,多西环素改善了一年时的生活质量(平均差异为 1.8 分,在皮肤病生活质量指数上更有利,95%CI 1.02 至 2.58 分;1 项研究,234 名参与者;高确定性证据)。与泼尼松龙相比,多西环素可能会降低一年时严重或危及生命的治疗相关不良事件(RR 0.59,95%CI 0.35 至 0.99;1 项研究,234 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。
由于只有两项试验(98 名参与者)提供了非常低确定性的证据,因此我们不确定硫唑嘌呤加泼尼松龙是否比单独使用泼尼松龙更能影响皮肤愈合或死亡率。这些研究没有测量生活质量。在接受硫唑嘌呤加泼尼松龙的 48 名参与者和接受泼尼松龙的 44 名参与者中,分别有 42%(20/48)和 34%(15/44)报告了不良事件。
由于只有一项试验(18 名参与者)提供了非常低确定性的证据,因此我们不确定烟酰胺加四环素是否比泼尼松龙更能影响皮肤愈合或死亡率。这项研究没有测量生活质量。在烟酰胺组中,不良事件报告较少。
由于只有一项试验(54 名参与者)提供了非常低确定性的证据,因此我们不确定硫唑嘌呤加甲泼尼龙是否比氨苯砜加甲泼尼龙更能影响皮肤愈合或死亡率。这项研究没有测量生活质量。在接受硫唑嘌呤加甲泼尼龙的 18 名参与者和接受氨苯砜加甲泼尼龙的 13 名参与者中,分别有 33%(18/54)和 26%(13/54)报告了不良事件。
全身涂抹氯倍他索丙酸酯乳膏与口服泼尼松龙相比,可能具有相似的疗效,且死亡率较低。全身应用低浓度氯倍他索丙酸酯乳膏可能与标准剂量的氯倍他索丙酸酯乳膏具有相似的疗效,且死亡率较低。与泼尼松龙相比,多西环素的疗效较差,但死亡率较低。其他治疗方法需要进一步研究。