Longitudinal Assessment of Curaçao Criteria in Children with Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of the Curaçao criteria by age over time in children with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT).

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients attending the HHT clinic at the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Canada) between 2000 and 2019. The evaluation of the Curaçao criteria was completed during initial and follow-up visits. Screening for pulmonary and brain arteriovenous malformations was completed at 5 yearly intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients with genetic confirmation of HHT were included in the analysis. At initial screening at a median (IQR) age of 8.4 (2.8, 12.9) years, 41% met criteria for a definite clinical diagnosis (≥3 criteria). In children <6 years at presentation, only 23% fulfilled at least 3 criteria initially. In longitudinal follow-up, 63% reached a definite clinical diagnosis, with a median (IQR) follow-up duration of 5.2 (3.2, 7.9) years (P = .005). Specifically, more patients met the epistaxis and telangiectasia criteria at last visit compared with initial (79% vs 60%; P = .006; 47% vs 30%; P = .02) but not for the arteriovenous malformation criterion (59% vs 57%; P = .65).

CONCLUSIONS

In the pediatric population, most patients do not meet definite clinical criteria of HHT at initial presentation. Although the number of diagnostic criteria met increased over time, mainly due to new onset of epistaxis and telangiectasia, accuracy remained low during follow-up visits. Relying solely on clinical criteria may lead to underdiagnosis of HHT in children.