• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

穆勒错误:线性无阈(LNT)剂量反应与美国环保署的癌症风险评估政策和实践。

Muller mistakes: The linear no-threshold (LNT) dose response and US EPA's cancer risk assessment policies and practices.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Health Sciences, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA; Morrill I, N344, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA; University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.

Retired from Oak Ridge National Laboratory at Oak Ridge, TN, USA.

出版信息

Chem Biol Interact. 2023 Sep 25;383:110653. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2023.110653. Epub 2023 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.cbi.2023.110653
PMID:37572872
Abstract

This paper identifies the occurrence of six major conceptual scientific errors of Hermann Muller and describes how these errors led to the creation of the linear no-threshold (LNT) dose response historically used worldwide for cancer risk assessments for chemical carcinogens and ionizing radiation. The paper demonstrates the significant role that Muller played in the environmental movement, affecting risk assessment policies and practices that are in force even now a half century following his death. This paper lends support to contemporary research that shows significant limitations of the LNT model for cancer risk assessment.

摘要

本文指出了赫尔曼·穆勒(Hermann Muller)所犯的六个主要概念性科学错误,并描述了这些错误如何导致了线性无阈(LNT)剂量反应模型的产生,该模型曾被全球用于评估化学致癌物和电离辐射的致癌风险。本文还展示了穆勒在环境运动中所扮演的重要角色,他的观点影响了风险评估政策和实践,即使在他去世半个世纪后的今天,这些政策和实践仍然在发挥作用。本文为当代研究提供了支持,这些研究表明 LNT 模型在癌症风险评估方面存在显著的局限性。

相似文献

1
Muller mistakes: The linear no-threshold (LNT) dose response and US EPA's cancer risk assessment policies and practices.穆勒错误:线性无阈(LNT)剂量反应与美国环保署的癌症风险评估政策和实践。
Chem Biol Interact. 2023 Sep 25;383:110653. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2023.110653. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
2
From Muller to mechanism: How LNT became the default model for cancer risk assessment.从 Muller 到机制:LNT 如何成为癌症风险评估的默认模型。
Environ Pollut. 2018 Oct;241:289-302. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.051. Epub 2018 May 22.
3
LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 1: Radiation and leukemia: Where LNT began.线性无阈模型(LNT)与癌症风险评估:其有缺陷的基础 1:辐射与白血病:LNT 的起源。
Environ Res. 2021 Jun;197:111025. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111025. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
4
Ethical challenges of the linear non-threshold (LNT) cancer risk assessment revolution: History, insights, and lessons to be learned.线性无阈(LNT)癌症风险评估革命的伦理挑战:历史、洞察与教训。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Aug 1;832:155054. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155054. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
5
Origin of the linearity no threshold (LNT) dose-response concept.线性无阈剂量反应概念的起源。
Arch Toxicol. 2013 Sep;87(9):1621-33. doi: 10.1007/s00204-013-1104-7. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
6
Why toxicologists resisted and radiation geneticists supported EPA'S adoption of LNT for cancer risk assessment.为什么毒理学家反对而辐射遗传学家支持环保署采用 LNT 进行癌症风险评估。
Chem Biol Interact. 2019 Sep 1;310:108736. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2019.108736. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
7
The linear No-Threshold (LNT) dose response model: A comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations.线性无阈(LNT)剂量反应模型:对其历史和科学基础的全面评估。
Chem Biol Interact. 2019 Mar 1;301:6-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2018.11.020. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
8
Key historical study findings questioned in debate over threshold versus linear non-threshold for cancer risk assessment.关键历史研究结果在阈值与线性非阈值癌症风险评估的辩论中受到质疑。
Chem Biol Interact. 2022 May 25;359:109917. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2022.109917. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
9
Hermann Muller and his LNT scientific and policy leadership: Private communication reveals uncertainties.赫尔曼·穆勒及其线性无阈科学和政策领导力:私人通信揭示了不确定性。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 15;904:166757. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166757. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
10
The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 1. The Russell-Muller debate.阈值与线性无阈模型的对决:剂量率研究结果揭示了线性无阈模型的缺陷 第1部分。拉塞尔 - 穆勒辩论。
Environ Res. 2017 Apr;154:435-451. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.12.006. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
False and Misleading Claims of Scientific Misconduct in Early Research into Radiation Dose-response: Part 1. Overlooking Key Historical Text.辐射剂量反应早期研究中关于科学不端行为的虚假和误导性指控:第1部分。忽视关键历史文本。
Health Phys. 2025 Jun 1;128(6):507-523. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001932. Epub 2024 Dec 10.