• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适应不良(黑暗面)和适应良好(光明面)的人格特质和防御风格。

Maladaptive (dark-side) and adaptive (bright-side) personality traits and defense styles.

机构信息

Department of Leadership and Organisational Behaviour, Norwegian Business School (BI), Nydalveien, Olso, Norway.

Department of Psychology, City University London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Sep;239:104002. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104002. Epub 2023 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104002
PMID:37573741
Abstract

This study explores the relationship between bright- and dark-side personality traits and four major styles of defense mechanisms (DMs) as this relationship remains unexplored and important in understanding the DMs. In all, 435 adult working participants (241 men; 194 women; Mean age 46.06 yrs) mainly in middle management jobs, completed a 78-item, six-trait measure of bright-side personality (HPTI: High Potential Type Indicator), a 25-item five-trait measure of the dark-side personality (PID-5;BF: DSM-5-Brief Form) and 88-item, four-styles measure of defense mechanisms (Defense Style Questionnaire). The aim was to examine demographic (sex, age, education), ideological and personality trait correlates of the DMs. It was hypothesized that the dark-side traits, particularly Detachment would be most strongly related to the DMs. Thereafter, a hierarchical linear regression was performed with each DM factor as criterion and predictors being demography, ideology, self-esteem as well as bright- and dark-side personality traits. Detachment was associated with all DMs, particularly Maladaptive (r = 0.68) and Image Distorting Style (r = 0.38) while Conscientiousness was associated with none. One implication concerns the assessment of DMs by standard tests. Limitations are acknowledged and include method invariance and sample homogeneity.

摘要

这项研究探讨了明暗人格特质与四种主要防御机制(DMs)风格之间的关系,因为这种关系在理解 DMs 方面仍然未被探索且很重要。共有 435 名成年在职参与者(241 名男性;194 名女性;平均年龄 46.06 岁)主要从事中层管理工作,完成了 78 项、六特质的明性人格量表(HPTI:高潜力类型指标)、25 项、五特质的暗性人格量表(PID-5;DSM-5-简短形式)和 88 项、四特质的防御机制量表(防御风格问卷)。目的是检验防御机制的人口统计学(性别、年龄、教育)、意识形态和人格特质相关性。假设暗性特质,特别是冷漠,与 DMs 的关系最密切。之后,进行了分层线性回归,每个 DM 因素作为标准,预测因子是人口统计学、意识形态、自尊以及明暗人格特质。冷漠与所有 DMs 相关,尤其是适应不良(r=0.68)和形象扭曲风格(r=0.38),而尽责性与任何 DMs 都不相关。一个含义涉及到标准测试对 DMs 的评估。承认存在局限性,包括方法不变性和样本同质性。

相似文献

1
Maladaptive (dark-side) and adaptive (bright-side) personality traits and defense styles.适应不良(黑暗面)和适应良好(光明面)的人格特质和防御风格。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Sep;239:104002. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104002. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
2
[Validation of a French translation of Krueger's personality inventory for DSM-5 in its brief form (PID-5 BF)].[克鲁格五因素人格问卷简版(PID-5 BF)法语翻译版的效度验证]
Encephale. 2018 Feb;44(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
3
Predicting personality disorder traits with the Defense Style Questionnaire in a normal sample.在正常样本中使用防御方式问卷预测人格障碍特质
J Pers Disord. 1999 Fall;13(3):281-6. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1999.13.3.281.
4
Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in the Measurement of Maladaptive Personality and Psychopathology.DSM-5 简明人格量表(PID-5-BF)在测量适应不良人格和精神病理学中的效用。
Assessment. 2018 Jul;25(5):596-607. doi: 10.1177/1073191116676889. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
5
The DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders from the perspective of adult attachment: a study in community-dwelling adults.从成人依恋视角看《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格障碍替代模型:一项针对社区居住成年人的研究
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2015 Apr;203(4):252-8. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000274.
6
Hierarchical structure of maladaptive personality traits in older adults: joint factor analysis of the PID-5 and the DAPP-BQ.老年人适应不良人格特质的层次结构:PID-5 和 DAPP-BQ 的联合因子分析。
J Pers Disord. 2014 Apr;28(2):198-211. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2013_27_114. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
7
Italian version of the defense style questionnaire.防御方式问卷意大利语版本。
Compr Psychiatry. 2004 Nov-Dec;45(6):483-94. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.07.012.
8
General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample.DSM-5 五因素框架中大学生样本的一般和适应不良特征。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):295-307. doi: 10.1177/1073191113475808. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
9
DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中替代人格障碍模型特质作为五因素模型的适应不良极端变体:一项项目反应理论分析
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 May;124(2):343-54. doi: 10.1037/abn0000035. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
10
[Experiences with the validation of the Hungarian version of Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form: predicting personality disorders based on self-report inventory].[《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版简式人格量表匈牙利语版的验证经验:基于自我报告量表预测人格障碍]
Psychiatr Hung. 2018;33(3):270-281.