Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):295-307. doi: 10.1177/1073191113475808. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
The relationships between two measures proposed to describe personality pathology, that is the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-3) and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), are examined in an undergraduate sample (N = 240). The NEO inventories are general trait measures, also considered relevant to assess disordered personality, whereas the PID-5 measure is specifically designed to assess pathological personality traits, as conceptualized in the DSM-5 proposal. A structural analysis of the 25 PID-5 traits confirmed the factor structure observed in the U.S. derivation sample, with higher order factors of Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Antagonism, Disinhibition, and Psychoticism. A joint factor analysis of, respectively, the NEO domains and their facets with the PID-5 traits showed that general and maladaptive traits are subsumed under an umbrella of five to six major dimensions that can be interpreted from the perspective of the five-factor model or the Personality Psychopathology Five. Implications for the assessment of personality pathology and the construction of models of psychopathology grounded in personality are discussed.
本研究在一个本科生样本中(N=240)考察了两种用于描述人格病理学的方法,即修订版 NEO 人格量表(NEO-PI-3)和 DSM-5 人格障碍量表(PID-5)之间的关系。NEO 量表是一般特质量表,也被认为与评估障碍性人格有关,而 PID-5 量表则是专门为评估 DSM-5 提案中概念化的病理性人格特质而设计的。对 25 个 PID-5 特质的结构分析证实了在美国推导样本中观察到的因素结构,具有较高的负性情绪、超脱、敌对、冲动和精神病性等因素。分别对 NEO 领域及其与 PID-5 特质的方面进行的联合因素分析表明,一般和适应不良的特质包含在五个到六个主要维度之下,这些维度可以从五因素模型或人格心理病理学五维度的角度来解释。讨论了基于人格的人格病理学评估和心理病理学模型构建的意义。