Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Phys Ther Sport. 2023 Sep;63:126-131. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
To examine the correlation of Single Leg Bridge Test (SLBT) scores with maximum isometric strength values obtained in handheld dynamometer (HHD) hamstring tests performed in a clinical setting.
Cross-sectional study.
Physical therapy clinic.
Fifty healthy and physically active men.
Correlation between SLBT scores and force values found in three HHD hamstring tests: test 'A', volunteer in prone with hip in neutral position and the knee flexed at ∼90°; test 'B', volunteer in supine with hip and knee flexed at ∼90°; and test 'C', volunteer in the same position used to perform the SLBT.
The volunteers' SLBT score was 27.55 ± 7.81 repetitions. The SLBT scores were poorly associated with mean (r = 0.246) and peak (r = 0.321) results provided by HHD test 'A'. There were no significant correlations between the SLBT scores and mean or peak values obtained in tests 'B' and 'C' (p > 0.05). Similarly, the SLBT between-limb asymmetry was not associated with asymmetries found in HHD hamstring tests (p > 0.05).
HHD hamstring tests should not be replaced by the SLBT. We recommend for clinicians to applying such tests in a complementary way to assess the hamstring's functional status.
研究单腿桥测试(SLBT)评分与在临床环境中使用手持测力计(HHD)进行的腘绳肌等长强度测试中获得的最大等长强度值之间的相关性。
横断面研究。
物理治疗诊所。
50 名健康且活跃的男性。
SLBT 评分与三种 HHD 腘绳肌测试中的力量值之间的相关性:测试 A,志愿者采取俯卧位,髋关节处于中立位,膝关节弯曲约 90°;测试 B,志愿者采取仰卧位,髋关节和膝关节弯曲约 90°;以及测试 C,志愿者采用与 SLBT 相同的姿势。
志愿者的 SLBT 评分为 27.55±7.81 次。SLBT 评分与 HHD 测试 A 的平均(r=0.246)和峰值(r=0.321)结果相关性较差。SLBT 评分与测试 B 和 C 的平均或峰值结果之间没有显著相关性(p>0.05)。同样,SLBT 两腿之间的不对称性与 HHD 腘绳肌测试中的不对称性无关(p>0.05)。
HHD 腘绳肌测试不应替代 SLBT。我们建议临床医生以互补的方式应用这些测试来评估腘绳肌的功能状态。