Suppr超能文献

单腿臀桥测试并非评估腘绳肌最大力量的有效临床工具。

Single Leg Bridge Test is Not a Valid Clinical Tool to Assess Maximum Hamstring Strength.

作者信息

Gasparin Gabriela Bissani, Ribeiro-Alvares João Breno Araujo, Baroni Bruno Manfredini

机构信息

Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre.

出版信息

Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Jun 1;17(4):613-621. doi: 10.26603/001c.34417. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The single leg bridge test (SLBT) has been introduced in the sports context as a way of estimating hamstring muscle capacity for prevention and rehabilitation of hamstring strain injuries.

PURPOSE

The primary aim was to examine the association between SLBT scores with concentric and eccentric knee flexor peak torques. Secondarily, this study aimed examine the association of between-limb asymmetries provided by SLBT and isokinetic tests.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

One hundred male soccer players (20±3 years) performed the SLBT and the knee flexion-extension isokinetic dynamometry evaluation (60°/s) billaterally during a single visit. SLBT score (i.e., number of repetitions until failure) and concentric and eccentric knee flexor peak torques (normalized per body mass) were considered for analysis. For both SLBT and isokinetic dynamometry, between-limb asymmetry was calculated as the percentage difference between the left limb and the right limb. Associations were assessed through Pearson's correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The mean SLBT score was 33.6±9.6 repetitions, concentric peak torque was 2.00±0.22 Nm/kg, and eccentric peak torque was 2.79±0.44 Nm/kg. Between-limb asymmetry was 0.4±9.6%, 1.08±8.5%, and 1.64±14.61% in SLBT, concentric, and eccentric tests, respectively. There was a poor association of SLBT score with concentric (p<0.001, r=0.275) and eccentric (p=0.002, r=0.215) peak torques. The SLBT between-limb asymmetry was poorly associated with asymmetry found in concentric peak torque asymmetry (p=0.033, r=0.213) and was not associated with eccentric peak torque asymmetry (p=0.539, r=0.062).

CONCLUSION

The SLBT should not be used as a clinical tool to assess the maximum strength of hamstring muscles.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

摘要

背景

单腿桥测试(SLBT)已被引入体育领域,作为一种评估腘绳肌能力以预防和康复腘绳肌拉伤的方法。

目的

主要目的是研究SLBT评分与膝关节屈伸肌向心和离心峰值扭矩之间的关联。其次,本研究旨在探讨SLBT和等速测试所提供的肢体间不对称性的关联。

研究设计

横断面研究。

方法

100名男性足球运动员(20±3岁)在一次就诊期间双侧进行了SLBT和膝关节屈伸等速测力评估(60°/s)。分析时考虑了SLBT评分(即直至疲劳的重复次数)以及膝关节屈伸肌向心和离心峰值扭矩(按体重标准化)。对于SLBT和等速测力测试,肢体间不对称性计算为左下肢与右下肢之间的百分比差异。通过Pearson相关系数评估关联性。

结果

SLBT平均评分为33.6±9.6次重复,向心峰值扭矩为2.00±0.22 Nm/kg,离心峰值扭矩为2.79±0.44 Nm/kg。SLBT、向心和离心测试中肢体间不对称性分别为0.4±9.6%、1.08±8.5%和1.64±14.61%。SLBT评分与向心(p<0.001,r=0.275)和离心(p=0.002,r=0.215)峰值扭矩之间关联较弱。SLBT肢体间不对称性与向心峰值扭矩不对称性中发现的不对称性关联较弱(p=0.033,r=0.213),与离心峰值扭矩不对称性无关联(p=0.539,r=0.062)。

结论

SLBT不应作为评估腘绳肌最大力量的临床工具。

证据水平

3级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/314a/9159716/a584499bf8ff/ijspt_2022_17_4_34417_87398.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验