J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Feb;48(2):72-80. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7634. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
Study Design Reliability and case-control injury study. Background Knee flexor strength is a key variable when dealing with hamstring strain injury (HSI), and methodologies of objective measurement of strength are often limited to single exercises. Objectives To establish test-retest reliability of a novel apparatus to measure knee flexor strength during various hamstring exercises, and to investigate whether the measure can detect between-leg differences in male participants with and without history of unilateral HSI. Methods Twenty male participants without and 10 male participants with previous unilateral HSI participated. Isometric knee flexor strength and peak rate of force development (RFD) at 0°/0°, 45°/45°, and 90°/90° of hip/knee flexion were measured, as well as force impulse during bilateral and unilateral variations of an eccentric slider and hamstring bridge, using a novel apparatus. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), typical error, and typical error as a coefficient of variation were calculated for all measures. The magnitudes of between-leg differences within each group were calculated using estimates of effect sizes, reported as Cohen's d and 90% confidence interval (CI). Results Moderate to high test-retest reliability was observed for isometric knee flexor strength (ICC = 0.87-0.92) and peak RFD (ICC = 0.88-0.95) across 3 positions and for mean force impulse during the eccentric slider (ICC = 0.83-0.90). In those with prior HSI, large deficits were observed in the previously injured leg compared to the contralateral uninjured leg for mean force impulse during the unilateral eccentric slider (d = -1.09; 90% CI: -0.20, -1.97), isometric strength at 0°/0° (d = -1.06; 90% CI: -0.18, -1.93) and 45°/45° (d = -0.88; 90% CI: -0.02, -1.74), and peak RFD at 45°/45° (d = -0.88; 90% CI: -0.02, -1.74). Conclusion The novel apparatus provides a reliable measure of isometric knee flexor strength, peak RFD, and force impulse during an eccentric slider, with deficits seen in previously injured hamstrings for these measures. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(2):72-80. Epub 26 Oct 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7634.
研究设计 可靠性和病例对照损伤研究。背景 膝关节屈肌力量是处理腘绳肌拉伤(HSI)的关键变量,而力量的客观测量方法通常仅限于单一练习。目的 建立一种新的装置来测量各种腘绳肌运动中的膝关节屈肌力量的测试-重测信度,并研究该测量方法是否可以检测出无单侧 HSI 史和有单侧 HSI 史的男性参与者之间的腿间差异。方法 20 名无单侧 HSI 史的男性参与者和 10 名有单侧 HSI 史的男性参与者参加了研究。使用一种新装置测量等长膝关节屈肌力量和 0°/0°、45°/45°和 90°/90°髋关节/膝关节屈伸时的峰值力量发展速率(RFD),以及双侧和单侧离心滑块和腘绳肌桥的力冲量。计算所有测量的组内相关系数(ICC)、典型误差和典型误差作为变异系数。使用效应量的估计值,即 Cohen's d 和 90%置信区间(CI),计算每组内腿间差异的大小。结果 等长膝关节屈肌力量(ICC = 0.87-0.92)和峰值 RFD(ICC = 0.88-0.95)在 3 个位置以及离心滑块期间的平均力冲量(ICC = 0.83-0.90)的测试-重测信度均为中等到高度可靠。在有单侧 HSI 史的参与者中,与对侧未受伤的腿相比,在单侧离心滑块期间的平均力冲量(d = -1.09;90%CI:-0.20,-1.97)、0°/0°时的等长强度(d = -1.06;90%CI:-0.18,-1.93)和 45°/45°(d = -0.88;90%CI:-0.02,-1.74)以及 45°/45°时的峰值 RFD(d = -0.88;90%CI:-0.02,-1.74)方面存在明显缺陷。结论 新装置可提供可靠的等长膝关节屈肌力量、峰值 RFD 和离心滑块期间的力冲量测量,这些测量方法在先前受伤的腘绳肌中存在缺陷。美国矫形外科医师学会杂志 2018 年;48(2):72-80。2017 年 10 月 26 日电子发表。doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7634。