Department of Otolaryngology, Nippon Medical School, Musashi Kosugi Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Department of Otolaryngology, Nippon Medical School, Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2024 Feb;51(1):61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2023.07.009. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
The odor recognition thresholds in T&T olfactometry are measured by either the examiner's judgment of the patients' odor expression for each standard odor or by the patient's choice of the correct response from an olfactory term table. This study aimed to clarify the correct odor expressions and use of the olfactory term table.
A questionnaire was administered to otolaryngologists or medical staff in charge of testing at facilities where T&T olfactometry is performed. The questionnaire consisted of the facility's background, environment and procedures of T&T olfactometry, choice of the correct answer with five different standard odors, and use of the olfactory term table. For the choices, the expressions used were those considered correct at Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital and the Kyoto Nose and Allergy Clinic.
A total of 81 valid responses were obtained. Most respondents belonged to medical and educational institutions (59.3%, 48/81). The laboratories in the respondents' institutions were completely ventilated using various methods. Clinical laboratory technicians inspected 51.7% (45/81) of the facilities. The order of standard odors in the odor recognition threshold test differs depending on the facility. When the examiner was unsure about the answer given by the patient in the odor recognition threshold test, 16.1% (9/56) of the respondents chose "present the olfactory term table," 33.9% (19/56) chose "increase the concentration," and 37.5% (21/56) chose "present the olfactory term table" or "increase the concentration," depending on the situation. A total of 96.4% (54/56) of the facilities treated odor expressions other than those in the olfactory term table as correct, and the odor expressions that were considered correct differed from facility to facility. Of the respondents, 80.2% (65/81) answered "I know the olfactory term table," and the mean value of satisfaction with the current olfactory term table was 4.4 ± 3.0. Of the respondents, 81.5% (53/65) answered that "the timing of presenting the olfactory term table should be standardized in all facilities."
In the odor recognition threshold test by T&T olfactometry, this study revealed that the odor expressions considered as correct answers for the standard odors and the use of the olfactory term table differed among facilities.
T&T 嗅敏度测试中的气味识别阈值,要么由检查者根据患者对每种标准气味的气味表达进行判断,要么由患者从气味术语表中选择正确的反应来测量。本研究旨在阐明正确的气味表达和使用气味术语表。
向在进行 T&T 嗅敏度测试的设施中负责测试的耳鼻喉科医生或医务人员发放问卷。问卷内容包括设施背景、T&T 嗅敏度测试的环境和程序、对 5 种不同标准气味的正确答案的选择,以及对气味术语表的使用。对于选择,使用了在日本医科大学玉川原山医院和京都鼻过敏诊所被认为是正确的表达方式。
共获得 81 份有效回复。大多数应答者来自医疗和教育机构(59.3%,48/81)。应答者所在机构的实验室使用各种方法进行完全通风。临床实验室技术员检查了 51.7%(45/81)的设施。气味识别阈值测试中的标准气味顺序因设施而异。当检查者对患者在气味识别阈值测试中的答案不确定时,16.1%(9/56)的应答者选择“呈现气味术语表”,33.9%(19/56)选择“增加浓度”,37.5%(21/56)根据情况选择“呈现气味术语表”或“增加浓度”。共有 96.4%(54/56)的设施将气味术语表之外的气味表达视为正确,且被认为正确的气味表达因设施而异。在应答者中,80.2%(65/81)回答“我知道气味术语表”,当前气味术语表的满意度平均值为 4.4±3.0。在应答者中,81.5%(53/65)回答“应在所有设施中标准化呈现气味术语表的时间”。
在 T&T 嗅敏度测试的气味识别阈值测试中,本研究表明,对于标准气味,被认为是正确答案的气味表达以及对气味术语表的使用在各设施之间存在差异。