Department of Biology, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, Virginia, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 30;15(7):e0233250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233250. eCollection 2020.
Intelligent systems in nature like the mammalian nervous system benefit from adaptable inputs that can tailor response profiles to their environment that varies in time and space. Study of such plasticity, in all its manifestations, forms a pillar of classical and modern neuroscience. This study is concerned with a novel form of plasticity in the olfactory system referred to as induction. In this process, subjects unable to smell a particular odor, or unable to differentiate similar odors, gain these abilities through mere exposure to the odor(s) over time without the need for attention or feedback (reward or punishment). However, few studies of induction have rigorously documented changes in olfactory threshold for the odor(s) used for "enrichment." We trained 36 CD-1 mice in an operant-olfactometer (go/no go task) to discriminate a mixture of stereoisomers from a lone stereoisomer using two enantiomeric pairs: limonene and carvone. We also measured each subject's ability to detect one of the stereoisomers of each odor. In order to assess the effect of odor enrichment on enantiomer discrimination and detection, mice were exposed to both stereoisomers of limonene or carvone for 2 to 12 weeks. Enrichment was effected by adulterating a subject's food (passive enrichment) with one pair of enantiomers or by exposing a subject to the enantiomers in daily operant discrimination testing (active enrichment). We found that neither form of enrichment altered discrimination nor detection. And this result pertained using either within-subject or between-subject experimental designs. Unexpectedly, our threshold measurements were among the lowest ever recorded for any species, which we attributed to the relatively greater amount of practice (task replication) we allowed our mice compared to other reports. Interestingly, discrimination thresholds were no greater (limonene) or only modestly greater (carvone) from detection thresholds suggesting chiral-specific olfactory receptors determine thresholds for these compounds. The super-sensitivity of mice, shown in this study, to the limonene and carvone enantiomers, compared to the much lesser acuity of humans for these compounds, reported elsewhere, may resolve the mystery of why the former group with four-fold more olfactory receptors have tended, in previous studies, to have similar thresholds to the latter group. Finally, our results are consistent with the conclusion that supervised-perceptual learning i.e. that involving repeated feedback for correct and incorrect decisions, rather than induction, is the form of plasticity that allows animals to fully realize the capabilities of their olfactory system.
自然界中的智能系统,如哺乳动物神经系统,受益于适应性输入,可以根据时间和空间的变化调整响应模式。研究这种可塑性的所有表现形式,是经典和现代神经科学的一个支柱。本研究关注的是嗅觉系统中一种被称为诱导的新形式的可塑性。在这个过程中,主体无法闻到特定的气味,或者无法区分相似的气味,通过长时间暴露于气味而获得这些能力,而无需注意或反馈(奖励或惩罚)。然而,很少有研究严格记录用于“丰富”的气味的嗅觉阈值的变化。我们在操作式嗅觉计(go/no go 任务)中训练了 36 只 CD-1 小鼠,以区分混合立体异构体与单独立体异构体,使用两对对映体:柠檬烯和香芹酮。我们还测量了每个主体检测每种气味的一个立体异构体的能力。为了评估气味丰富对对映体辨别和检测的影响,将小鼠暴露于柠檬烯或香芹酮的两种立体异构体 2 至 12 周。通过用一对对映体污染主体的食物(被动丰富)或通过在每日操作辨别测试中使主体暴露于对映体(主动丰富)来实现丰富。我们发现,无论是哪种形式的丰富都不会改变辨别或检测。并且,这个结果使用了内被试或被试间实验设计。出乎意料的是,我们的阈值测量结果是任何物种中记录到的最低值之一,我们将其归因于我们允许老鼠进行的相对更多的练习(任务重复),而与其他报告相比。有趣的是,辨别阈值(柠檬烯)或仅适度增加(香芹酮)来自检测阈值,这表明手性特异性嗅觉受体决定了这些化合物的阈值。与其他地方报道的人类对这些化合物的敏感性相比,本研究中显示的小鼠对柠檬烯和香芹酮对映体的超敏感性,可能解决了为什么在前一组具有四倍多的嗅觉受体的情况下,在以前的研究中,往往与后一组具有相似的阈值的奥秘。最后,我们的结果与结论一致,即监督感知学习,即涉及对正确和错误决策的重复反馈,而不是诱导,是使动物能够充分发挥其嗅觉系统能力的可塑性形式。