Clinic of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, Zurich, 8032, Switzerland.
Clinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, Zürich, 8032, Switzerland.
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Aug 13;23(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03291-6.
Reducing the necessary time to restore primary teeth improves the cooperation of paediatric patients. This study aimed to investigate the marginal integrity of restorations prepared with a bulk-fill resin-based composite (RBC) containing additional fragmentation chain transfer (AFCT) compared to a conventional RBC when light cured with a rapid high-irradiance (3 s) and a regular (10 s) curing mode.
Forty class-II cavities were prepared in 40 primary molars. The molars were randomly divided into four groups based on the applied light-curing modes (regular: 10 s @ 1200 mW/cm or high-irradiance: 3 s @ 3000 mW/cm) and the used restorative material (AFCT-containing bulk-fill RBC "Power Fill" or AFCT-free conventional RBC "Prime"). After thermo-mechanical loading, the marginal integrity was analysed using scanning electron microscopy. A beta regression model and pairwise comparisons were used to statistically analyse the data.
The mean marginal integrity (% ± SD) of the restorations for each group was as follows: Power Fill (10 s: 79.7 ± 15.6) (3 s: 77.6 ± 11.3), Prime (10 s: 69.7 ± 11.1) (3 s: 75.0 ± 9.7). The difference between the RBCs for the same light-curing mode was statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05). The difference between the light-curing modes for the same RBC was not statistically significant (p ˃ 0.5).
AFCT-containing bulk-fill RBC "Power Fill" achieves similar marginal integrity when light-cured with either high-irradiance or regular light-curing modes. "Power Fill" achieves better marginal integrity than the conventional RBC "Prime" regardless of the applied light-curing mode.
缩短恢复乳牙所需的时间可以提高儿科患者的配合度。本研究旨在比较一种含有额外断链转移剂(AFCT)的块状充填型树脂基复合材料(RBC)与一种传统 RBC 在采用快速高辐射(3 秒)和常规(10 秒)固化模式固化时的边缘完整性。
在 40 颗乳磨牙上制备了 40 个 II 类洞。这些磨牙随机分为四组,依据所使用的光固化模式(常规:10 秒@1200 mW/cm 或高辐射:3 秒@3000 mW/cm)和使用的修复材料(含 AFCT 的块状充填 RBC“Power Fill”或不含 AFCT 的传统 RBC“Prime”)进行分组。经过热机械负荷后,使用扫描电子显微镜分析边缘完整性。使用贝塔回归模型和两两比较对数据进行统计学分析。
每组修复体的平均边缘完整性(%±SD)如下:Power Fill(10 秒:79.7±15.6)(3 秒:77.6±11.3),Prime(10 秒:69.7±11.1)(3 秒:75.0±9.7)。相同光固化模式下 RBC 之间的差异具有统计学意义(p≤0.05)。相同 RBC 下光固化模式之间的差异无统计学意义(p>0.5)。
含 AFCT 的块状充填 RBC“Power Fill”在采用高辐射或常规光固化模式固化时可获得相似的边缘完整性。无论采用何种光固化模式,“Power Fill”的边缘完整性均优于传统 RBC“Prime”。