School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Dec;32(6):1636-1653. doi: 10.1111/inm.13204. Epub 2023 Aug 13.
Mental health crises cause significant distress and disruption to the lives of individuals and their families. Community crisis care systems are complex, often hard to navigate and poorly understood. This realist evidence synthesis aimed to explain how, for whom and in what circumstances community mental health crisis services for adults work to resolve crises and is reported according to RAMESES guidelines. Using realist methodology, initial programme theories were identified and then tested through iterative evidence searching across 10 electronic databases, four expert stakeholder consultations and n = 20 individual interviews. 45 relevant records informed the three initial programme theories, and 77 documents, were included in programme theory testing. 39 context, mechanism, outcome configurations were meta-synthesized into three themes: (1) The gateway to urgent support; (2) Values based crisis interventions and (3) Leadership and organizational values. Fragmented cross-agency responses exacerbated staff stress and created barriers to access. Services should focus on evaluating interagency working to improve staff role clarity and ensure boundaries between services are planned for. Organizations experienced as compassionate contributed positively to perceived accessibility but relied on compassionate leadership. Attending to the support needs of staff and the proximity of leaders to the front line of crisis care are key. Designing interventions that are easy to navigate, prioritize shared decision-making and reduce the risk of re-traumatizing people is a priority.
心理健康危机给个人及其家庭的生活带来了巨大的痛苦和困扰。社区危机护理系统复杂,往往难以驾驭且理解不足。本真实证据综合研究旨在根据 RAMESES 指南解释社区精神卫生危机服务对成年人如何解决危机,为谁服务以及在什么情况下有效。使用真实主义方法,首先确定初始方案理论,然后通过在 10 个电子数据库、4 次专家利益相关者咨询和 20 次个人访谈中进行迭代证据搜索来测试这些理论。45 份相关记录为三个初始方案理论提供了信息,77 份文件被纳入方案理论测试。39 个情境、机制、结果配置被元综合成三个主题:(1)紧急支持的门户;(2)基于价值观的危机干预;(3)领导力和组织价值观。分散的跨机构反应加剧了员工的压力,并为获取服务设置了障碍。服务应侧重于评估机构间的工作,以提高员工角色的明确性,并计划服务之间的界限。被认为富有同情心的组织对可及性有积极影响,但依赖于富有同情心的领导。关注员工的支持需求以及领导者与危机护理第一线的接近程度是关键。设计易于驾驭、优先考虑共同决策并降低再次使人们创伤的风险的干预措施是当务之急。