Donnelly J P
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986 Sep;5(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(86)90009-x.
Disk diffusion susceptibility tests for Augmentin were performed on 239 patients isolates. They were interpreted by means of Stoke's criteria, the ICS method, and a modified error minimization technique. A reference minimal inhibitory concentration of less than or equal to 16 mg/L was chosen to correspond to likely therapeutic success in urinary tract infection and the performance of each method was compared. Zone radii of inhibition correlated well with the minimal inhibitory concentration. A single urinary breakpoint for susceptibility could be established by means of the error minimization technique (Zs greater than or equal to 6 mm radius) which classified 1% of strains as falsely susceptible. The false-resistant rate, however, was increased to 14% and alternative test conditions are advised if true rates of resistance are to be determined. Use of an indeterminate category (4 less than Z1 less than 6 mm radius) is recommended when the rate of resistance is in excess of 20% but not otherwise.
对239株患者分离菌株进行了阿莫西林克拉维酸的纸片扩散药敏试验。采用斯托克斯标准、ICS方法和改良的误差最小化技术对结果进行解释。选择参考最低抑菌浓度小于或等于16mg/L来对应尿路感染可能的治疗成功情况,并比较了每种方法的性能。抑菌圈半径与最低抑菌浓度相关性良好。通过误差最小化技术(抑菌圈半径Zs大于或等于6mm)可确定单一的药敏尿路断点,该技术将1%的菌株分类为假敏感。然而,假耐药率增加到了14%,如果要确定真正的耐药率,建议采用其他测试条件。当耐药率超过20%时,建议使用不确定类别(抑菌圈半径Z1在4至6mm之间),否则不建议使用。