Boak Jennifer, Rasekaba Tshepo, Baxter Pamela, Blackberry Irene
Bendigo Health, Community Nursing Service, East Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
John Richards Centre for Ageing Research, La Trobe University, Wodonga, Victoria, Australia.
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Jan;80(1):84-95. doi: 10.1111/jan.15824. Epub 2023 Aug 13.
To identify and explore tools that measured and detected complexity of care among community dwelling people aged 65 years and older.
Databases were searched for articles published up to 23 September 2022 including CINAHL, EMBASE and MEDLINE, Cochrane database for trials and grey literature.
A scoping review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible articles included those with participants aged over 65 years, living in the community and studies that included care complexity detection or assessment and how this related to care delivered. Covidence was used to screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles.
Eighteen full texts were reviewed; four studies were included in the final review. All selected studies included people aged over 65 years living in the community. A high level of reliability for the items included in the interventions was found. The selected studies included tools for assessing older person's needs with nurses involved in the assessment.
The review identified four tools for measuring complexity in community dwelling older people. Two tools have the capacity to objectively measure complexity due to the holistic nature of items included and appear easy to use to support clinical judgement decisions.
The review places a spotlight on the concept of complexity and highlights the lack of definition of care complexity. The synthesized result highlights the need to explore detection of care complexity of older people further and consider ways of supporting clinical judgement and decision making of community nurses. The use of a validated tool may enhance clinical judgement regarding care complexity and may lead to a more consistent and timely approach to care.
During the development phase, the study was presented to a consumer group from the researcher's workplace.
CRD42022299336.
识别并探索用于测量和检测65岁及以上社区居住人群护理复杂性的工具。
检索数据库以获取截至2022年9月23日发表的文章,包括护理学与健康领域数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库和医学期刊数据库、考科蓝试验数据库以及灰色文献。
按照系统评价与Meta分析扩展版(PRISMA)指南进行范围综述并报告。符合条件的文章包括参与者年龄超过65岁、居住在社区的研究,以及包含护理复杂性检测或评估以及其与所提供护理的关系的研究。使用Covidence筛选标题、摘要和全文文章。
对18篇全文进行了评审;最终评审纳入了4项研究。所有选定的研究都包括居住在社区的65岁以上人群。发现干预措施中所包含项目具有高度可靠性。选定的研究包括用于评估老年人需求的工具,且有护士参与评估。
该综述确定了4种用于测量社区居住老年人护理复杂性的工具。由于所包含项目的整体性,其中两种工具能够客观地测量复杂性,并且似乎易于使用以支持临床判断决策。
该综述聚焦于护理复杂性的概念,并强调了护理复杂性缺乏定义的问题。综合结果突出了进一步探索老年人护理复杂性检测的必要性,并考虑支持社区护士临床判断和决策的方法。使用经过验证的工具可能会增强对护理复杂性的临床判断,并可能导致更一致和及时的护理方法。
在研究开展阶段,该研究向研究人员工作场所的一个消费者群体进行了介绍。
国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册号:CRD42022299336。