• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响失败后更换植入物存活的危险因素:一项回顾性研究。

Risk factors impacting the survival of implants replaced following failure: A retrospective study.

作者信息

Lee Dongseob, Ko Young-Chang, Seol Yang-Jo, Koo Ki-Tae, Lee Yong-Moo, Lee Jungwon

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

National Dental Care Center for Persons With Special Needs, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Dec;25(6):1008-1018. doi: 10.1111/cid.13265. Epub 2023 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1111/cid.13265
PMID:37574782
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to investigate factors influencing the survival of replaced dental implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Charts from 2005 to 2021 were reviewed. Replaced implants after removal for the first time were identified. Depending on their survival, the replaced group was divided into the surviving and second-removal groups. Risk factors affecting survival of replaced implants were evaluated considering clustering of multiple implants within patients.

RESULTS

The present study included 464 replaced implants of 370 patients, of which 429 and 35 implants were categorized into the surviving group and the second-removal group. The 5-year survival rate was 90.2 ± 0.18% in replaced implants at sites with a periodontitis history and 97.0 ± 0.15% at sites without a periodontitis history (p = 0.008). The 5-year survival rate was 89.1 ± 0.27% in replaced implants with guided bone regeneration (GBR) at first implant placement and 93.9 ± 0.14% at non-GBR (p = 0.032). The 5-year survival rate was 97.6 ± 0.13% in replaced implants with GBR and 90.3 ± 0.17% in replaced implants without GBR (p = 0.026). In the multivariable analysis adjusted for clinical variables, periodontitis history (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 3.417; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.161-10.055), GBR at first implant placement (aHR = 2.152; 95% CI = 1.052-4.397) and non-GBR at primary implant replacement (aHR = 0.262; 95% CI = 0.088-0.778) were identified as independent risk factors for second implant removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Periodontitis history, GBR at first implant placement and non-GBR at primary implant replacement were identified as risk factors affecting the survival of replaced implants.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查影响种植体置换后种植体存留的因素。

材料与方法

回顾2005年至2021年的病历。确定首次取出后进行置换的种植体。根据其存留情况,将置换组分为存留组和二次取出组。考虑到患者体内多个种植体的聚集情况,评估影响置换种植体存留的危险因素。

结果

本研究纳入了370例患者的464颗置换种植体,其中429颗和35颗种植体分别被归入存留组和二次取出组。有牙周炎病史部位的置换种植体5年存留率为90.2±0.18%,无牙周炎病史部位的置换种植体5年存留率为97.0±0.15%(p = 0.008)。首次种植时采用引导骨再生(GBR)的置换种植体5年存留率为89.1±0.27%,未采用GBR的为93.9±0.14%(p = 0.032)。采用GBR的置换种植体5年存留率为97.6±0.13%,未采用GBR的置换种植体5年存留率为90.3±0.17%(p = 0.026)。在对临床变量进行校正的多变量分析中,牙周炎病史(校正风险比[aHR]=3.417;95%置信区间[CI]=1.161 - 10.055)、首次种植时采用GBR(aHR = 2.152;95% CI = 1.052 - 4.397)以及初次种植体置换时未采用GBR(aHR = 0.262;95% CI = 0.088 - 0.778)被确定为二次种植体取出的独立危险因素。

结论

牙周炎病史、首次种植时采用GBR以及初次种植体置换时未采用GBR被确定为影响置换种植体存留的危险因素。

相似文献

1
Risk factors impacting the survival of implants replaced following failure: A retrospective study.影响失败后更换植入物存活的危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Dec;25(6):1008-1018. doi: 10.1111/cid.13265. Epub 2023 Aug 13.
2
Analysis of implant loss risk factors after simultaneous guided bone regeneration: A retrospective study of 5404 dental implants.分析同期引导骨再生后种植体失败的风险因素:5404 例牙种植体的回顾性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Jun;24(3):276-286. doi: 10.1111/cid.13087. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
3
Factors influencing marginal bone loss at a hydrophilic implant design placed with or without GBR procedures: A 5-year retrospective study.影响亲水种植体设计在有无 GBR 手术情况下边缘骨丧失的因素:一项为期 5 年的回顾性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):817-826. doi: 10.1111/cid.12826. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
4
Retrospective success and survival rates of dental implants placed with simultaneous bone augmentation in partially edentulous patients.部分牙列缺损患者同期植骨种植体植入的回顾性成功率和生存率
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jul;25(7):768-73. doi: 10.1111/clr.12185. Epub 2013 May 5.
5
Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.种植体植入前三种临床情况下使用引导骨再生术(GBR)进行垂直骨嵴增高:对35例患者负重后12至72个月的回顾性研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):502-10.
6
Esthetics and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Implants Placed with Guided Bone Regeneration and Complete Native Bone: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial.引导骨再生和完整原生骨植入的美学和患者报告结局:一项前瞻性对照临床试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):406-414. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7751.
7
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of OsseoSpeed EV Implants.OsseoSpeed EV 种植体的临床和影像学评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 Oct 17;38(5):963-975. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10258.
8
Guided bone regeneration and abutment connection augment the buccal soft tissue contour: 3-year results of a prospective comparative clinical study.引导骨组织再生与基台连接改善颊侧软组织轮廓:一项前瞻性对比临床研究的3年结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Feb;28(2):219-225. doi: 10.1111/clr.12786. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
9
Ridge expansion alone or in combination with guided bone regeneration to facilitate implant placement in narrow alveolar ridges: a retrospective study.单纯牙槽嵴扩展或联合引导骨再生以促进在狭窄牙槽嵴中植入种植体:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Feb;26(2):204-11. doi: 10.1111/clr.12317. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
10
Long-term clinical and radiographic results after treatment or no treatment of small buccal bone dehiscences at posterior dental implants: A randomized, controlled clinical trial.种植体周颊侧骨缺损的治疗与非治疗的长期临床及影像学效果:一项随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Jun;31(6):517-525. doi: 10.1111/clr.13588. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation between newly formed bone and the progression of experimental peri-implantitis with or without alveolar ridge preservation in infected and non-infected teeth: a secondary analysis of a preclinical study.在感染和未感染牙齿中,新形成骨与有无牙槽嵴保存的实验性种植体周围炎进展之间的相关性:一项临床前研究的二次分析
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2025 Apr;55(2):139-152. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2402100105.