• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

波多黎各人群中用于宫颈癌筛查的高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测

High risk HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in a Puerto Rican population.

作者信息

Gustafson Erik A, Santa Rosario Juan C, Rios-Bedoya Carlos, de Socarraz Mariano

机构信息

CorePlus Servicios Clínicos y Patológicos LLC, Carolina, PR 00983, United States.

McLaren Health Care Corporation, Graduate Medical Education, Grand Blanc, MI 48439, United States.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2023 Jul 6;48:101236. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101236. eCollection 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.gore.2023.101236
PMID:37576355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10422122/
Abstract

The Human Papillomavirus (HPV) causes cervical cancer, the fourth most common cause of death in women in the United States (US). Several major screening clinical trials have demonstrated that high risk HPV (HR-HPV) DNA primary screen is more sensitive at determining the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia level 3 or higher (CIN ≥ 3) than cytology alone and is similar to co-testing. In this cross-sectional study, we characterized a Hispanic population of 18,052 women ages 21-70 years with HR-HPV DNA testing and cytology to determine the prevalence of HR-HPV in the population and determine the likelihood of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). We also compared cytology, HR-HPV DNA testing, and co-testing strategies to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for HSIL in cervical biopsies. Results show that HR-HPV had a slightly higher sensitivity (94.2% vs 92.3%) compared to cytology for all high-grade disease (CIN2/3).

摘要

人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)可引发宫颈癌,而宫颈癌是美国女性第四大常见死因。多项主要筛查临床试验表明,高危型HPV(HR-HPV)DNA初筛在确定宫颈上皮内瘤变3级或更高级别(CIN≥3)风险方面比单纯细胞学检查更为敏感,且与联合检测效果相似。在这项横断面研究中,我们对18052名年龄在21至70岁的西班牙裔女性进行了HR-HPV DNA检测和细胞学检查,以确定该人群中HR-HPV的患病率,并确定高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)的可能性。我们还比较了细胞学检查、HR-HPV DNA检测和联合检测策略,以确定宫颈活检中HSIL的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果显示,对于所有高级别疾病(CIN2/3),HR-HPV的敏感性略高于细胞学检查(94.2%对92.3%)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c30/10422122/8706962e5738/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c30/10422122/8706962e5738/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c30/10422122/8706962e5738/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
High risk HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in a Puerto Rican population.波多黎各人群中用于宫颈癌筛查的高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2023 Jul 6;48:101236. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101236. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
[Clinical value of p16 immunocytochemistry in cervical cancer screening].p16免疫细胞化学在宫颈癌筛查中的临床价值
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Nov 25;55(11):784-790. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200520-00428.
3
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.英格兰原发性人乳头瘤病毒子宫颈筛查的临床效果和成本效益:通过三轮筛查对 ARTISTIC 随机试验队列进行的扩展随访。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Apr;18(23):1-196. doi: 10.3310/hta18230.
4
Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.25 岁及以上女性宫颈癌筛查中致癌型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测及 HPV16 或 HPV18 基因分型的性能:ATHENA 研究的一项亚组分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):880-90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70188-7. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
5
[Evaluation of CIN2+ /CIN3+ risk of different HPV subtypes infection combined with abnormal cytology status].[不同HPV亚型感染合并细胞学异常状态下CIN2+/CIN3+风险的评估]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 23;40(3):232-238. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.03.015.
6
Aptima HPV messenger RNA testing and histopathologic follow-up in women with HSIL cytology: A study emphasizing additional review of HPV-negative cases.Aptima HPV mRNA 检测和 HSIL 细胞学女性的组织病理随访:强调对 HPV 阴性病例进行额外复查的研究。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2021 Aug;129(8):622-631. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22421. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
7
Cytology and high risk HPV testing in cervical cancer screening program: Outcome of 3-year follow-up in an academic institute.宫颈癌筛查项目中的细胞学和高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测:一所学术机构的3年随访结果
Diagn Cytopathol. 2018 Jan;46(1):22-27. doi: 10.1002/dc.23843. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
8
Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trial.人乳头瘤病毒检测在高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变和宫颈癌筛查中的应用:POBASCAM 随机对照研究的最终结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):78-88. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70296-0. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
9
Role of p16(INK4a) cytology testing as an adjunct to enhance the diagnostic specificity and accuracy in human papillomavirus-positive women within an organized cervical cancer screening program.在有组织的宫颈癌筛查项目中,p16(INK4a)细胞学检测作为辅助手段以提高人乳头瘤病毒阳性女性诊断特异性和准确性的作用。
Acta Cytol. 2012;56(5):506-14. doi: 10.1159/000338979. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of cervical cancer screening and screening-triage strategies among women living with HIV-1 in Burkina Faso and South Africa: A cohort study.布基纳法索和南非艾滋病毒 1 型感染者中宫颈癌筛查和筛查分流策略的诊断准确性:一项队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 4;18(3):e1003528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003528. eCollection 2021 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of primary human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening: Results from the HPV FOCAL Trial.宫颈癌筛查中应用人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)初筛的成本效果分析:HPV FOCAL 试验结果。
Cancer Med. 2021 May;10(9):2996-3003. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3864. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
2
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
Incidence of Cervical Cancer in Puerto Rico, 2001-2017.
波多黎各 2001-2017 年宫颈癌发病率。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;7(3):456-458. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7488.
4
Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.普通风险人群的宫颈癌筛查:美国癌症协会 2020 年指南更新。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Sep;70(5):321-346. doi: 10.3322/caac.21628. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
5
Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of primary cytology versus human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in England.英国宫颈癌筛查中,原发性细胞学检查与人类乳头瘤病毒检测的临床影响及成本效益
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 May 7;29(4):669-675. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000161.
6
Effect of Screening With Primary Cervical HPV Testing vs Cytology Testing on High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia at 48 Months: The HPV FOCAL Randomized Clinical Trial.HPV 焦点随机临床试验:48 个月时,用初级宫颈 HPV 检测与细胞学检测筛查对高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变的影响。
JAMA. 2018 Jul 3;320(1):43-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7464.
7
Relative Performance of HPV and Cytology Components of Cotesting in Cervical Screening.HPV 和细胞学检测在宫颈癌筛查中的相对性能。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 May 1;110(5):501-508. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx225.
8
Are the University Hospitals in Puerto Rico following Current Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening?波多黎各的大学医院是否遵循当前宫颈癌筛查指南?
P R Health Sci J. 2015 Sep;34(3):142-7.
9
US assessment of HPV types in cancers: implications for current and 9-valent HPV vaccines.美国对癌症中HPV类型的评估:对当前和九价HPV疫苗的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Apr 29;107(6):djv086. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv086. Print 2015 Jun.
10
Comparison of cervical cancer screening results among 256,648 women in multiple clinical practices.256,648名女性在多个临床机构中的宫颈癌筛查结果比较。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2015 May;123(5):282-8. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21544. Epub 2015 Apr 10.