• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国宫颈癌筛查中,原发性细胞学检查与人类乳头瘤病毒检测的临床影响及成本效益

Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of primary cytology versus human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in England.

作者信息

Bains Irenjeet, Choi Yoon Hong, Soldan Kate, Jit Mark

机构信息

Modelling and Economics Unit, Public Health England, London, UK.

HIV & STI Department, Public Health England, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 May 7;29(4):669-675. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000161.

DOI:10.1136/ijgc-2018-000161
PMID:31018938
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In England, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is to replace cytological screening by 2019-2020. We conducted a model-based economic evaluation to project the long-term clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of routine cytology versus HPV testing.

METHODS

An individual-based model of HPV acquisition, natural history, and cervical cancer screening was used to compare cytological screening and HPV testing with cytology triage for women aged 25-64 years (with either 3- or 5-year screening intervals for women aged under 50 years). The model was fitted to data from England's National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme. Both clinical and economic outcomes were projected to inform cost-effectiveness analyses.

RESULTS

HPV testing is likely to decrease annual cytology testing (by 2.76 million), cervical cancer incidence (by 290 cases), and health system costs (by £13 million). It may increase the number of colposcopies, although this could be reduced without leading to more cancers compared with primary cytology by increasing the interval between screens to 5 years. The impact in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) depends on the quality of life weight given to colposcopies versus cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

England's move from cytology to HPV screening may potentially be life-saving and cost-effective. Cost-effectiveness can be improved further by extending the interval between screens or using alternative triage methods such as partial or full genotyping.

摘要

目标

在英国,到2019 - 2020年人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测将取代细胞学筛查。我们进行了一项基于模型的经济评估,以预测常规细胞学检查与HPV检测的长期临床影响和成本效益。

方法

使用一个基于个体的HPV感染、自然史和宫颈癌筛查模型,比较25 - 64岁女性的细胞学筛查以及HPV检测加细胞学分流(50岁以下女性筛查间隔为3年或5年)。该模型与英国国家医疗服务体系宫颈癌筛查项目的数据相拟合。对临床和经济结果进行预测,以指导成本效益分析。

结果

HPV检测可能会减少每年的细胞学检测次数(减少276万次)、宫颈癌发病率(减少290例)以及卫生系统成本(减少1300万英镑)。它可能会增加阴道镜检查的次数,不过,通过将筛查间隔延长至5年,与初次细胞学检查相比,在不导致更多癌症的情况下,这一情况可能会得到缓解。在质量调整生命年(QALY)方面的影响取决于赋予阴道镜检查与癌症的生活质量权重。

结论

英国从细胞学筛查转向HPV筛查可能具有潜在的挽救生命和成本效益。通过延长筛查间隔或使用替代分流方法,如部分或全基因分型,可以进一步提高成本效益。

相似文献

1
Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of primary cytology versus human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in England.英国宫颈癌筛查中,原发性细胞学检查与人类乳头瘤病毒检测的临床影响及成本效益
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 May 7;29(4):669-675. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000161.
2
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.英格兰原发性人乳头瘤病毒子宫颈筛查的临床效果和成本效益:通过三轮筛查对 ARTISTIC 随机试验队列进行的扩展随访。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Apr;18(23):1-196. doi: 10.3310/hta18230.
3
Decision-analytic modeling to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HPV-DNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening in Germany.决策分析模型用于评估德国宫颈癌初筛中HPV-DNA检测的长期有效性和成本效益。
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2010 Apr 27;6:Doc05. doi: 10.3205/hta000083.
4
HPV testing compared with routine cytology in cervical screening: long-term follow-up of ARTISTIC RCT.HPV 检测与常规细胞学检查在宫颈癌筛查中的比较:ARTISTIC RCT 的长期随访。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jun;23(28):1-44. doi: 10.3310/hta23280.
5
Age-specific effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus screening versus cytology in a cervical cancer screening program: a nationwide cross-sectional study.基于人群的宫颈癌筛查项目中适龄 HPV 初筛与细胞学检查效果比较:一项全国性的横断面研究
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2022 Mar;42(3):191-204. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12256. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
6
[Health technology assessment report: HPV DNA based primary screening for cervical cancer precursors].[卫生技术评估报告:基于人乳头瘤病毒DNA的宫颈癌前病变初筛]
Epidemiol Prev. 2012 May-Aug;36(3-4 Suppl 1):e1-72.
7
Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing.宫颈癌筛查的成本效益:细胞学与人类乳头瘤病毒 DNA 检测。
BJOG. 2012 May;119(6):699-709. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03228.x. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
8
Primary HPV testing versus cytology-based cervical screening in women in Australia vaccinated for HPV and unvaccinated: effectiveness and economic assessment for the National Cervical Screening Program.澳大利亚 HPV 疫苗接种和未接种女性中基于 HPV 的细胞学筛查与初级 HPV 检测的比较:国家宫颈癌筛查计划的有效性和经济评估。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Feb;2(2):e96-e107. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30007-5. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
9
Assessment of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HPV testing in primary screening for cervical.HPV检测在子宫颈癌初筛中的有效性和成本效益评估。
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2007 Sep 4;3:Doc08.
10
Budget impact analysis of cervical cancer screening in Portugal: comparison of cytology and primary HPV screening strategies.葡萄牙宫颈癌筛查的预算影响分析:细胞学筛查与初级 HPV 筛查策略的比较。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 26;19(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6536-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the role of the oncology nurse in cervical cancer screening programs during times of transition.探索肿瘤护理人员在转型期宫颈癌筛查项目中的作用。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2025 Jan 1;35(1):223-243. eCollection 2025 Winter.
2
Early adoption of innovation in HPV prevention strategies: closing the gap in cervical cancer.早期采用人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)预防策略的创新措施:缩小宫颈癌防治差距
Ecancermedicalscience. 2024 Sep 11;18:1762. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1762. eCollection 2024.
3
What Are the Economic Arguments for Mandating LGBT+ Health Training for Healthcare Providers? An Economic Evaluation of the Impacts of LGBT+ Health Training on Cervical Screening.
要求医疗保健提供者接受LGBT+健康培训的经济论据有哪些?对LGBT+健康培训对宫颈癌筛查影响的经济评估。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Mar 21;14(3):260. doi: 10.3390/bs14030260.
4
High risk HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in a Puerto Rican population.波多黎各人群中用于宫颈癌筛查的高危型人乳头瘤病毒检测
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2023 Jul 6;48:101236. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101236. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Cervical cancer screening in Jordan; a review of the past and an outlook to the future - facts and figures.约旦的宫颈癌筛查:回顾过去与展望未来——事实与数据
Prz Menopauzalny. 2023 Mar;22(1):24-29. doi: 10.5114/pm.2023.126345. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
6
Te Ara Waiora-Implementing human papillomavirus (HPV) primary testing to prevent cervical cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand: A protocol for a non-inferiority trial.《在新西兰实施人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)初筛以预防宫颈癌:一项非劣效性试验方案》。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0280643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280643. eCollection 2023.
7
Maximizing the cost-effectiveness of cervical screening in the context of routine HPV vaccination by optimizing screening strategies with respect to vaccine uptake: a modeling analysis.在常规 HPV 疫苗接种的背景下,通过优化疫苗接种率相关的筛查策略来实现宫颈癌筛查的成本效益最大化:建模分析。
BMC Med. 2023 Feb 10;21(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02748-3.
8
The incidence of cervical cancer in women with postcoital bleeding and abnormal appearance of the cervix referred through the 2-week wait pathway in the United Kingdom: A retrospective cohort study.英国通过 2 周等待途径转诊的性交后出血和宫颈异常外观的女性中宫颈癌的发病率:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022 Nov;48(11):2872-2878. doi: 10.1111/jog.15366. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
9
Re-valuation of annual cytology using HPV self-sampling to upgrade prevention (REACH UP): A feasibility study in women living with HIV in the UK.使用 HPV 自我采样对年度细胞学检查进行重新评估以提高预防效果(REACH UP):英国 HIV 感染者中的一项可行性研究。
HIV Med. 2022 Apr;23(4):390-396. doi: 10.1111/hiv.13257. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
10
Patterns of anxiety and distress over 12 months following participation in HPV primary screening.参与 HPV 初筛后 12 个月内的焦虑和困扰模式。
Sex Transm Infect. 2022 Jun;98(4):255-261. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2020-054780. Epub 2021 Aug 3.