Suppr超能文献

中成药治疗宫颈高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染的疗效与安全性比较:一项贝叶斯网络Meta分析

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Patent Medicines for Cervical High-risk Human Papillomavirus Infection: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Bin Chengli, Zhong Hanzhi, Mo Jing, Wang Zhenyi, Li Maoya, Wei Shaobin

机构信息

Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

Graduate School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

J Cancer. 2023 Jul 31;14(12):2373-2385. doi: 10.7150/jca.86043. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Many Chinese patent medicines have been reported to show anti-tumor cell effects on cervical cancer. To estimate the comparative effectiveness and safety of Chinese patent medicines for cervical high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Chinese patent medicines for HR-HPV infection were searched in eight databases until 31 August 2022, and two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Outcomes concerning efficacy were evaluated as odds ratio (OR) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) utilizing R 4.1.2 and Stata 16.1. The protocol was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022351120). We ultimately identified 60 RCTs that involved 5,951 participants and 8 interventions. Chinese patent medicines combined with recombinant human interferon (rhIFN) have better treatment effects than rhIFN alone. The results showed that Baofukang suppository (BFK) combined with rhIFN is greater for the rate of HR-HPV clearance follow-up at 6 months (SUCRA = 78.16%). Kushen gel (KS) combined with rhIFN ranked first for the rate of HR-HPV clearance after treatment (SUCRA = 90.77%). Furthermore, KS + rhIFN is most likely to be the best intervention for improving the clinical effectiveness rate (SUCRA = 87.39%). Adverse reactions were not statistically significant in BFK + rhIFN versus BFK, BFK + rhIFN versus rhIFN, and BFK versus rhIFN. The combination of Chinese patent medicines with rhIFN may demonstrate a higher efficacy than rhIFN alone in clearing the virus and improving cervical symptoms. Weighing with the clinical comprehensive efficacy, BFK + rhIFN and KS + rhIFN maybe the optimal treatments for cervical HR-HPV infection. However, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed in the future to further confirm the efficacy and safety of proprietary Chinese medicines for cervical HR-HPV infection.

摘要

许多中成药已被报道对子宫颈癌显示出抗肿瘤细胞作用。为评估中成药治疗子宫颈高危型人乳头瘤病毒(HR-HPV)感染的相对有效性和安全性。检索了8个数据库中截至2022年8月31日关于中成药治疗HR-HPV感染的随机对照试验(RCT),两位综述作者独立提取数据并评估偏倚风险。利用R 4.1.2和Stata 16.1将疗效相关结局评估为比值比(OR)和95%可信区间(CrI)。该方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(CRD42022351120)注册。我们最终纳入了60项RCT,涉及5951名参与者和8种干预措施。中成药联合重组人干扰素(rhIFN)比单独使用rhIFN具有更好的治疗效果。结果显示,保妇康栓(BFK)联合rhIFN在6个月随访时HR-HPV清除率更高(累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)=78.16%)。苦参凝胶(KS)联合rhIFN在治疗后HR-HPV清除率方面排名第一(SUCRA =90.77%)。此外,KS+rhIFN最有可能是提高临床有效率的最佳干预措施(SUCRA =87.39%)。BFK+rhIFN与BFK、BFK+rhIFN与rhIFN以及BFK与rhIFN之间的不良反应无统计学意义。中成药与rhIFN联合使用在清除病毒和改善宫颈症状方面可能比单独使用rhIFN具有更高的疗效。综合临床疗效来看,BFK+rhIFN和KS+rhIFN可能是子宫颈HR-HPV感染的最佳治疗方法。然而,未来需要更多高质量的随机对照试验来进一步证实中成药治疗子宫颈HR-HPV感染的疗效和安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a4/10414044/855980f911bd/jcav14p2373g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验