Buss Stephanie S, Fried Peter J, Macone Joanna, Zeng Victor, Zingg Emma, Santarnecchi Emiliano, Pascual-Leone Alvaro, Bartrés-Faz David
Division of Cognitive Neurology, Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jul 27;17:1193407. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1193407. eCollection 2023.
To investigate the relationship between cortico-motor excitability and cognitive reserve (CR) in cognitively unimpaired older adults (CU) and in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD).
Data were collected and analyzed from 15 CU and 24 amyloid-positive AD participants aged 50-90 years. A cognitive reserve questionnaire score (CRQ) assessed education, occupation, leisure activities, physical activities, and social engagement. Cortical excitability was quantified as the average amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEP amplitude) elicited with single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation delivered to primary motor cortex. A linear model compared MEP amplitudes between groups. A linear model tested for an effect of CRQ on MEP amplitude across all participants. Finally, separate linear models tested for an effect of CRQ on MEP amplitude within each group. Exploratory analyses tested for effect modification of demographics, cognitive scores, atrophy measures, and CSF measures within each group using nested regression analysis.
There was no between-group difference in MEP amplitude after accounting for covariates. The primary model showed a significant interaction term of group*CRQ (R = 0.18, = 0.013), but no main effect of CRQ. Within the CU group, higher CRQ was significantly associated with lower MEP amplitude (R = 0.45, = 0.004). There was no association in the AD group.
Lower cortico-motor excitability is related to greater CRQ in CU, but not in AD. Lower MEP amplitudes may reflect greater neural efficiency in cognitively unimpaired older adults. The lack of association seen in AD participants may reflect disruption of the protective effects of CR. Future work is needed to better understand the neurophysiologic mechanisms leading to the protective effects of CR in older adults with and without neurodegenerative disorders.
研究认知未受损的老年人(CU)以及患有轻度认知障碍或由阿尔茨海默病(AD)导致的轻度痴呆的老年人中皮质运动兴奋性与认知储备(CR)之间的关系。
收集并分析了15名年龄在50 - 90岁的CU参与者和24名淀粉样蛋白阳性的AD参与者的数据。通过认知储备问卷评分(CRQ)评估教育程度、职业、休闲活动、体育活动和社交参与情况。皮质兴奋性通过向初级运动皮层施加单脉冲经颅磁刺激所诱发的运动诱发电位的平均波幅(MEP波幅)进行量化。采用线性模型比较组间的MEP波幅。采用线性模型检验CRQ对所有参与者MEP波幅的影响。最后,采用单独的线性模型检验CRQ对每组内MEP波幅的影响。探索性分析采用嵌套回归分析检验每组内人口统计学、认知评分、萎缩测量指标和脑脊液测量指标的效应修正情况。
在考虑协变量后,组间MEP波幅无差异。主模型显示组*CRQ有显著的交互项(R = 0.18,P = 0.013),但CRQ无主效应。在CU组中,较高的CRQ与较低的MEP波幅显著相关(R = 0.45,P = 0.004)。AD组中无相关性。
较低的皮质运动兴奋性与CU中较高的CRQ相关,但与AD无关。较低的MEP波幅可能反映了认知未受损老年人更高的神经效率。AD参与者中缺乏相关性可能反映了CR保护作用的破坏。需要进一步的研究来更好地理解导致CR对患有和未患有神经退行性疾病的老年人产生保护作用的神经生理机制。