Suppr超能文献

急诊科阿片类药物治疗创伤性疼痛的疗效:系统评价与贝叶斯网络Meta分析

Efficacy of opioids for traumatic pain in the emergency department: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Fu Yawen, Liu Qiang, Nie Hu

机构信息

Department of Emergency, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

West China Xiamen Hospital of Sichuan University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jul 27;14:1209131. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1209131. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

To systematically assess and rank the efficacy of opioid medications for traumatic pain in the emergency department in terms of pain relief, adverse events and rescue analgesia. Four databases were systematically searched until 26 September 2022: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Outcomes were pain relief, adverse events (dizziness, hypotension, pruritus, sedation), and rescue analgesia. For each outcome, network plots were drawn to exhibit direct and indirect comparisons, and rank probabilities were utilized to rank the efficacy of different opioids. Twenty studies of 3,040 patients were eligible for this network meta-analysis. According to the rank probabilities, the top three analgesic medications for pain relief may be sufentanil (78.29% probability of ranking first), buprenorphine (48.54% probability of ranking second) and fentanyl (53.25% probability of ranking third); buprenorphine (31.20%), fentanyl (20.14%) and sufentanil (21.55%) were least likely to cause dizziness; the top three analgesic medications which were least likely to cause hypotension were buprenorphine (81.64%), morphine (45.02%) and sufentanil (17.27%); butorphanol (40.56%), morphine (41.11%) and fentanyl (14.63%) were least likely to cause pruritus; the top three medications which were least likely to cause sedation were hydrocodone + acetaminophen (97.92%), morphine (61.85%) and butorphanol (55.24%); patients who received oxycodone (83.64%), butorphanol (38.31%) and fentanyl (25.91%) were least likely to need rescue analgesia in sequence. Sufentanil, buprenorphine and fentanyl may be superior to other opioid medications in terms of pain relief and the incidence of dizziness, hypotension and pruritus, which might be selected as opioid analgesics for traumatic pain in the emergency setting.

摘要

为了从疼痛缓解、不良事件和补救镇痛方面系统评估急诊科阿片类药物治疗创伤性疼痛的疗效并进行排序。系统检索了四个数据库直至2022年9月26日:PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science。结局指标为疼痛缓解、不良事件(头晕、低血压、瘙痒、镇静)和补救镇痛。对于每个结局指标,绘制网状图以展示直接和间接比较,并利用排序概率对不同阿片类药物的疗效进行排序。纳入了20项研究共3040例患者进行该网状Meta分析。根据排序概率,疼痛缓解方面排名前三的镇痛药物可能是舒芬太尼(排名第一的概率为78.29%)、丁丙诺啡(排名第二的概率为48.54%)和芬太尼(排名第三的概率为53.25%);丁丙诺啡(31.20%)、芬太尼(20.14%)和舒芬太尼(21.55%)引起头晕的可能性最小;引起低血压可能性最小的排名前三的镇痛药物是丁丙诺啡(81.64%)、吗啡(45.02%)和舒芬太尼(17.27%);布托啡诺(40.56%)、吗啡(41.11%)和芬太尼(14.63%)引起瘙痒的可能性最小;引起镇静可能性最小的排名前三的药物是氢可酮+对乙酰氨基酚(97.92%)、吗啡(61.85%)和布托啡诺(55.24%);依次接受羟考酮(83.64%)、布托啡诺(38.31%)和芬太尼(25.91%)治疗的患者需要补救镇痛的可能性最小。在疼痛缓解以及头晕、低血压和瘙痒的发生率方面,舒芬太尼、丁丙诺啡和芬太尼可能优于其他阿片类药物,可作为急诊科创伤性疼痛的阿片类镇痛药选用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0ef/10413574/6efc5749467f/fphar-14-1209131-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验