Raff Milton, Belbachir Anissa, El-Tallawy Salah, Ho Kok Yuen, Nagtalon Eric, Salti Amar, Seo Jeong-Hwa, Tantri Aida Rosita, Wang Hongwei, Wang Tianlong, Buemio Kristal Cielo, Gutierrez Consuelo, Hadjiat Yacine
Pain Clinic, Christiaan Barnard Memorial Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Faculté de médecine, Université Paris-Descartes, Pôle d'anesthésie-réanimation, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
Pain Ther. 2019 Jun;8(1):19-39. doi: 10.1007/s40122-019-0122-4. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
Optimal pain management is crucial to the postoperative recovery process. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous oxycodone with intravenous fentanyl, morphine, sufentanil, pethidine, and hydromorphone for acute postoperative pain.
A systematic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases was performed for randomized controlled trials published from 2008 through 2017 (inclusive) that evaluated the acute postoperative analgesic efficacy of intravenous oxycodone against fentanyl, morphine, sufentanil, pethidine, and hydromorphone in adult patients (age ≥ 18 years). Outcomes examined included analgesic consumption, pain intensity levels, side effects, and patient satisfaction.
Eleven studies were included in the review; six compared oxycodone with fentanyl, two compared oxycodone with morphine, and three compared oxycodone with sufentanil. There were no eligible studies comparing oxycodone with pethidine or hydromorphone. Overall, analgesic consumption was lower with oxycodone than with fentanyl or sufentanil. Oxycodone exhibited better analgesic efficacy than fentanyl and sufentanil, and comparable analgesic efficacy to morphine. In terms of safety, there was a tendency towards more side effects with oxycodone than with fentanyl, but the incidence of side effects with oxycodone was comparable to morphine and sufentanil. Where patient satisfaction was evaluated, higher satisfaction levels were observed with oxycodone than with sufentanil and comparable satisfaction was noted when comparing oxycodone with fentanyl. Patient satisfaction was not evaluated in the studies comparing oxycodone with morphine.
Our findings suggest that intravenous oxycodone provides better analgesic efficacy than fentanyl and sufentanil, and comparable efficacy to morphine with less adverse events such as sedation. No studies comparing intravenous oxycodone with pethidine or hydromorphone were identified in this review. Better alignment of study methodologies for future research in this area is recommended to provide the best evidence base for a meta-analysis.
Mundipharma Singapore Holding Pte Ltd, Singapore.
最佳疼痛管理对术后恢复过程至关重要。我们旨在评估静脉注射羟考酮与静脉注射芬太尼、吗啡、舒芬太尼、哌替啶和氢吗啡酮用于术后急性疼痛的疗效和安全性。
对PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和EMBASE数据库进行系统文献检索,查找2008年至2017年(含)发表的随机对照试验,这些试验评估了静脉注射羟考酮对成年患者(年龄≥18岁)术后急性疼痛的镇痛效果,对比药物为芬太尼、吗啡、舒芬太尼、哌替啶和氢吗啡酮。检查的结果包括镇痛药物消耗量、疼痛强度水平、副作用和患者满意度。
该综述纳入了11项研究;6项比较了羟考酮与芬太尼,2项比较了羟考酮与吗啡,3项比较了羟考酮与舒芬太尼。没有符合条件的研究比较羟考酮与哌替啶或氢吗啡酮。总体而言,羟考酮的镇痛药物消耗量低于芬太尼或舒芬太尼。羟考酮的镇痛效果优于芬太尼和舒芬太尼,与吗啡相当。在安全性方面,羟考酮的副作用倾向比芬太尼多,但羟考酮的副作用发生率与吗啡和舒芬太尼相当。在评估患者满意度的研究中,羟考酮的满意度高于舒芬太尼,与芬太尼相比满意度相当。在比较羟考酮与吗啡的研究中未评估患者满意度。
我们的研究结果表明,静脉注射羟考酮的镇痛效果优于芬太尼和舒芬太尼,与吗啡相当,且镇静等不良事件较少。本综述未发现比较静脉注射羟考酮与哌替啶或氢吗啡酮的研究。建议在该领域的未来研究中更好地统一研究方法,为荟萃分析提供最佳证据基础。
新加坡萌蒂制药私人有限公司,新加坡