Department of Cardiology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology Catharina Hospital Eindhoven The Netherlands.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Aug 15;12(16):e030480. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030480. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
Background Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) are physiological parameters to assess coronary microvascular dysfunction. CFR and MRR can be assessed using bolus or continuous thermodilution, and the correlation between these methods has not been clarified. Furthermore, their association with angina and quality of life is unknown. Methods and Results In total, 246 consecutive patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries from the multicenter Netherlands Registry of Invasive Coronary Vasomotor Function Testing (NL-CFT) were investigated. The 36-item Short Form Health Survey Quality of Life and Seattle Angina questionnaires were completed by 153 patients before the invasive measurements. CFR and MRR were measured consecutively with bolus and continuous thermodilution. Mean continuous thermodilution-derived coronary flow reserve (CFR) was significantly lower than mean bolus thermodilution-derived coronary flow reserve (CFR) (2.6±1.0 versus 3.5±1.8; <0.001), with a modest correlation (=0.305; <0.001). Mean continuous thermodilution-derived microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) was also significantly lower than mean bolus thermodilution-derived MRR (MRR) (3.1±1.1 versus 4.2±2.5; <0.001), with a weak correlation (=0.280; <0.001). CFR and MRR showed no correlation with any of the angina and quality of life domains, whereas CFR and MRR showed a significant correlation with physical limitation (=0.005, =0.009, respectively) and health (=0.026, =0.012). In a subanalysis in patients in whom spasm was excluded, the correlation further improved (MRR versus physical limitation: =0.363; =0.041, MRR versus physical health: =0.482; =0.004). No association with angina frequency and stability was found. Conclusions Absolute flow measurements using continuous thermodilution to calculate CFR and MRR weakly correlate with, and are lower than, the surrogates CFR and MRR. Absolute flow parameters showed a relationship with physical complaints. No relationship with angina frequency and stability was found.
冠状血流储备(CFR)和微血管阻力储备(MRR)是评估冠状动脉微血管功能障碍的生理参数。可以使用弹丸或连续热稀释法评估 CFR 和 MRR,并且这两种方法之间的相关性尚未明确。此外,它们与心绞痛和生活质量的关系尚不清楚。
本研究纳入了来自多中心荷兰冠状动脉血管舒缩功能检测注册研究(NL-CFT)的 246 例连续心绞痛且冠状动脉无阻塞的患者。153 例患者在进行有创性检查前完成了 36 项简短健康调查问卷和西雅图心绞痛问卷。连续地使用弹丸和连续热稀释法测量 CFR 和 MRR。连续热稀释法衍生的平均 CFR(2.6±1.0)显著低于弹丸热稀释法衍生的平均 CFR(3.5±1.8)(<0.001),两种方法相关性适度(=0.305;<0.001)。连续热稀释法衍生的平均 MRR 也显著低于弹丸热稀释法衍生的平均 MRR(MRR)(3.1±1.1 比 4.2±2.5;<0.001),两种方法相关性较弱(=0.280;<0.001)。CFR 和 MRR 与任何心绞痛和生活质量领域均无相关性,而 CFR 和 MRR 与身体受限(=0.005,=0.009)和健康状况(=0.026,=0.012)显著相关。在排除痉挛的患者的亚分析中,相关性进一步改善(MRR 与身体受限:=0.363;=0.041,MRR 与身体健康:=0.482;=0.004)。与心绞痛频率和稳定性无相关性。
使用连续热稀释法进行绝对流量测量以计算 CFR 和 MRR 与替代的 CFR 和 MRR 相关性较弱且值较低。绝对流量参数与身体不适有关。与心绞痛频率和稳定性无相关性。