• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助治疗后切除的胰腺癌的肿瘤病理性反应:是否影响预后?

Pathologic tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic cancer: does it affect prognosis?

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090, Milan, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.

Pancreatic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Milan, Rozzano, Italy.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2023 Sep;75(6):1497-1508. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01628-y. Epub 2023 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1007/s13304-023-01628-y
PMID:37578734
Abstract

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) + surgical resection for pancreatic cancer (PC) has gained consensus in recent years. Pathological response (PR) is generally assessed according to the College of American Pathologists grading system, ranging from 0 (complete response) to 3 (no response). The aim of our study is to evaluate the PR in a series of resections for PC after NAT and its prognostic implication. 112 patients undergone NAT and resection for PC between 2011 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. PR was 0/1, 2 and 3 in 18 (15%), 79 (61%) and 29 (24%) cases, respectively. Chemotherapy regimens different from FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (OR 11.61 (2.53-53.36), p = 0.002) and lymphovascular invasion (OR 11.28 (1.89-67.23), p = 0.008) were associated to PR-3. Median follow-up was 25.8 (3.6-130.5) months. For PR-0/1, PR-2 and PR-3, median DFS was 45.8, 11.5, 4.6 months (p < 0.0001), respectively, while median OS was not reached, 27.1 and 17.5 months (p = 0.0006), respectively. At univariate analysis, PR-0/1 was significantly associated to better DFS and OS (HR 0.33 (0.17-0.67), p = 0.002; HR 0.20 (0.07-0.54), p = 0.002, respectively). At multivariate analysis, pancreaticoduodenectomy (HR 0.50 (0.30-0.84), p = 0.009), LNR (HR 27.14 (1.21-608.9), p = 0.038) and lymphovascular invasion (HR 1.99 (1.06-3.76), p = 0.033) were independently associated to DFS; pre-treatment CA 19.9 value (HR 1.00 (1.00-1.00), p = 0.025), post-treatment resectability status (HR 0.51 (0.28-0.95), p = 0.035), pancreaticoduodenectomy (HR 0.56 (0.32-0.99), p = 0.050), severe morbidity (2.99 (1.22-7.55), p = 0.017), LNR (HR 56.8 (2.08-1548.3), p = 0.017), lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.18 (1.08-4.37), p = 0.029) were independently associated to OS. PR did not reach statistical significance at multivariate analysis. A favorable PR is observed only in a limited number of cases. The prognostic role of PR, despite being promising, remains unclear and further multicentric studies are needed.

摘要

新辅助治疗(NAT)联合胰腺切除术(PC)近年来已达成共识。病理反应(PR)通常根据美国病理学家协会分级系统进行评估,范围从 0(完全反应)到 3(无反应)。我们的研究旨在评估一系列经 NAT 治疗后行胰腺切除术患者的 PR 及其预后意义。回顾性分析了 2011 年至 2020 年间接受 NAT 和 PC 切除术的 112 例患者。PR 为 0/1、2 和 3 的患者分别为 18(15%)、79(61%)和 29(24%)例。与 FOLFIRINOX 和吉西他滨+nab-紫杉醇(OR 11.61(2.53-53.36),p=0.002)和血管淋巴管侵犯(OR 11.28(1.89-67.23),p=0.008)不同的化疗方案与 PR-3 相关。中位随访时间为 25.8(3.6-130.5)个月。对于 PR-0/1、PR-2 和 PR-3,中位 DFS 分别为 45.8、11.5 和 4.6 个月(p<0.0001),中位 OS 分别为未达到、27.1 和 17.5 个月(p=0.0006)。单因素分析显示,PR-0/1 与更好的 DFS 和 OS 显著相关(HR 0.33(0.17-0.67),p=0.002;HR 0.20(0.07-0.54),p=0.002)。多因素分析显示,胰十二指肠切除术(HR 0.50(0.30-0.84),p=0.009)、淋巴结比值(HR 27.14(1.21-608.9),p=0.038)和血管淋巴管侵犯(HR 1.99(1.06-3.76),p=0.033)与 DFS 独立相关;治疗前 CA 19.9 值(HR 1.00(1.00-1.00),p=0.025)、治疗后可切除性状态(HR 0.51(0.28-0.95),p=0.035)、胰十二指肠切除术(HR 0.56(0.32-0.99),p=0.049)、严重发病率(HR 2.99(1.22-7.55),p=0.017)、淋巴结比值(HR 56.8(2.08-1548.3),p=0.017)和血管淋巴管侵犯(HR 2.18(1.08-4.37),p=0.029)与 OS 独立相关。PR 在多因素分析中未达到统计学意义。仅在有限数量的病例中观察到有利的 PR。尽管 PR 的预后作用很有希望,但仍不清楚,需要进一步的多中心研究。

相似文献

1
Pathologic tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic cancer: does it affect prognosis?新辅助治疗后切除的胰腺癌的肿瘤病理性反应:是否影响预后?
Updates Surg. 2023 Sep;75(6):1497-1508. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01628-y. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
2
FOLFIRINOX Versus Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel for Neoadjuvant Treatment of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma.FOLFIRINOX 对比吉西他滨/白蛋白紫杉醇用于可切除和交界可切除胰头腺癌的新辅助治疗。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul;25(7):1896-1903. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6512-8. Epub 2018 May 14.
3
Predictors of Resectability and Survival in Patients With Borderline and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer who Underwent Neoadjuvant Treatment With FOLFIRINOX.FOLFIRINOX 新辅助治疗后可切除性和生存预测因素分析:交界性和局部进展期胰腺癌患者
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):733-740. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002600.
4
Racial Disparity in Pathologic Response following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Resected Pancreatic Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Analysis from the Central Pancreatic Consortium.新辅助化疗后接受手术切除的胰腺癌患者病理反应的种族差异:来自胰腺中央联盟的多机构分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Mar;30(3):1485-1494. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12741-4. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
5
Delta Radiomic Features Predict Resection Margin Status and Overall Survival in Neoadjuvant-Treated Pancreatic Cancer Patients.Delta 放射组学特征可预测新辅助治疗的胰腺癌患者的切缘状态和总生存期。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr;31(4):2608-2620. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14805-5. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
6
Neoadjuvant-modified FOLFIRINOX vs nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients who achieved surgical resection.新辅助改良 FOLFIRINOX 对比 nab-紫杉醇联合吉西他滨治疗手术可切除或局部进展期胰腺癌患者。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jul;9(13):4711-4723. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3075. Epub 2020 May 16.
7
Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Underwent Surgery Following Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX.新辅助 FOLFIRINOX 治疗后接受手术的胰腺导管腺癌患者辅助化疗的生存获益。
Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jul;55(3):956-968. doi: 10.4143/crt.2022.409. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
8
Prognostic Value of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients with Resected Pancreatic Cancer.新辅助治疗后系统性免疫炎症指数(SII)对可切除胰腺癌患者的预后价值。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar;27(3):898-906. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-08094-0. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
9
Survival Outcomes Associated With Clinical and Pathological Response Following Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel Chemotherapy in Resected Pancreatic Cancer.新辅助 FOLFIRINOX 或吉西他滨/白蛋白紫杉醇化疗后切除的胰腺癌的临床和病理反应与生存结局的相关性。
Ann Surg. 2019 Sep;270(3):400-413. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003468.
10
Smoking impairs the effect of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX on postresection survival in pancreatic cancer.吸烟会削弱新辅助FOLFIRINOX方案对胰腺癌切除术后生存率的影响。
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Nov;193:113293. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113293. Epub 2023 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinicopathological predictive factors in long-term survivors who underwent surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A single-center propensity score matched analysis.接受手术治疗的胰腺导管腺癌长期存活者的临床病理预测因素:一项单中心倾向评分匹配分析。
World J Surg. 2024 Dec;48(12):3001-3013. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12397. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
2
The Association between Sampling and Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Pancreaticoduodenectomy.接受新辅助治疗和胰十二指肠切除术的胰腺导管腺癌患者的采样与生存之间的关联
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 27;16(19):3312. doi: 10.3390/cancers16193312.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cannabidiol Enhances Cabozantinib-Induced Apoptotic Cell Death via Phosphorylation of p53 Regulated by ER Stress in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.大麻二酚通过内质网应激调节的p53磷酸化增强卡博替尼诱导的肝癌细胞凋亡性死亡。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 5;15(15):3987. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153987.
2
Integrated Pathologic Score Effectively Stratifies Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Pancreaticoduodenectomy.综合病理评分可有效分层接受新辅助治疗和胰十二指肠切除术的胰腺导管腺癌患者。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2023 Apr 1;47(4):421-430. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002013. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
3
Pathological Complete Response in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma After Preoperative Chemotherapy.
术前化疗后切除的胰腺导管腺癌患者的病理完全缓解。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2417625. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17625.
4
Complete Primary Pathological Response Following Neoadjuvant Treatment and Radical Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.新辅助治疗及根治性切除术后胰腺导管腺癌的完全原发性病理反应
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 20;16(2):452. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020452.
Immediate surgery compared with short-course neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus capecitabine, FOLFIRINOX, or chemoradiotherapy in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (ESPAC5): a four-arm, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial.
在可切除边缘的胰腺癌患者中,即刻手术与短程新辅助吉西他滨联合卡培他滨、FOLFIRINOX或放化疗的比较(ESPAC5):一项四臂、多中心、随机、2期试验
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Feb;8(2):157-168. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00348-X. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
4
Efficacy of Preoperative mFOLFIRINOX vs mFOLFIRINOX Plus Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Borderline Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas: The A021501 Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.术前 mFOLFIRINOX 对比 mFOLFIRINOX 联合短程放疗治疗边界可切除胰腺腺癌的疗效:A021501 期随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Sep 1;8(9):1263-1270. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.2319.
5
Neoadjuvant Treatment for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy?可切除及边界可切除胰腺癌的新辅助治疗:化疗还是放化疗?
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 14;11:744161. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.744161. eCollection 2021.
6
Neoadjuvant therapy or upfront surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.可切除和交界可切除胰腺癌的新辅助治疗或 upfront 手术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2022 Jan;160:140-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.10.023. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
7
Omitting surgery in esophageal cancer patients with complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.新辅助放化疗后完全缓解的食管癌患者省略手术治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Nov 14;16(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01947-7.
8
Neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced unresectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: oncological outcomes at a single academic centre.局部进展期不可切除和交界可切除胰腺癌的新辅助治疗:单中心的肿瘤学结果。
ESMO Open. 2020 Nov;5(6):e000929. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000929.
9
Radiotherapy for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreas Cancer: When and Why?可切除和边缘可切除胰腺癌的放疗:何时以及为何?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Mar;25(3):843-848. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04838-6. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
10
Efficacy of Endoscopic Vacuum-Assisted Closure Treatment for Postoperative Anastomotic Leak in Gastric Cancer.内镜下真空辅助闭合治疗胃癌术后吻合口漏的疗效。
Gut Liver. 2020 Nov 15;14(6):746-754. doi: 10.5009/gnl20114.