• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估卫生系统权力下放面临的挑战:路径依赖和指标选择的作用——评“卫生部门财政分权对医疗服务的可及性、可获得性和利用的影响:面板数据分析”

Challenges in Assessment of Health Systems Decentralization: The Role of Path Dependence and Choice of Indicators Comment on "The Effects of Health Sector Fiscal Decentralisation on Availability, Accessibility, and Utilisation of Healthcare Services: A Panel Data Analysis".

机构信息

School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7427. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.74274. Epub 2023 Jun 18.

DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.2023.74274
PMID:37579362
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10461893/
Abstract

Optimal resource allocation within national health systems represents the ultimate challenge in diverse countries worldwide. Major part of the literature points that health systems decentralization potentially address the challenge. The present commentary focuses on the debate referring to effects of health systems decentralization, based on the evidence of the study of Arianna Rotulo and colleagues. Studies on the subject emphasize the role of path dependence and the influence of choice of indicators for measurement of effects in the assessment of health systems decentralization. Acknowledging the complexity of the phenomena, the results of the study of Rotulo et al on health system decentralization in Italy are highlighted through the analysis of recent evidence from the literature. The present commentary shows that there are diverse indicators adopted in the literature on the subject, pointing to mixed results, depending on country characteristics and selection of indicators in the analysis. The synthesis of indicators gathered in recent studies also indicate that health system indicators are sensitive to path dependence, thus, requiring additional attention to assumptions of studies on health systems decentralization. Thus, studies should consider the influence of path dependence on organizational practices and institutional structures involved in decentralization processes, in addition to acknowledging that assessments on decentralization vary substantially according to indicators adopted in the analysis, and their links with previous decisions within health systems.

摘要

在全球不同国家,优化国家卫生系统内的资源配置是一项终极挑战。大部分文献指出,卫生系统权力下放有可能应对这一挑战。本述评基于 Arianna Rotulo 及其同事的研究证据,聚焦于卫生系统权力下放相关效果的争论。该主题的研究强调了路径依赖的作用,以及在评估卫生系统权力下放时,选择指标进行效果衡量的影响。鉴于该现象的复杂性,本文通过分析文献中最近的证据,突出了 Rotulo 等人对意大利卫生系统权力下放的研究结果。本述评表明,该主题的文献中采用了多种指标,结果因国家特点和分析中指标的选择而有所不同。最近研究中综合的指标也表明,卫生系统指标对路径依赖敏感,因此,需要对卫生系统权力下放的研究假设给予额外关注。因此,研究应考虑路径依赖对参与权力下放过程的组织实践和制度结构的影响,同时承认,根据分析中采用的指标以及它们与卫生系统内先前决策的联系,对权力下放的评估存在很大差异。

相似文献

1
Challenges in Assessment of Health Systems Decentralization: The Role of Path Dependence and Choice of Indicators Comment on "The Effects of Health Sector Fiscal Decentralisation on Availability, Accessibility, and Utilisation of Healthcare Services: A Panel Data Analysis".评估卫生系统权力下放面临的挑战:路径依赖和指标选择的作用——评“卫生部门财政分权对医疗服务的可及性、可获得性和利用的影响:面板数据分析”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7427. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.74274. Epub 2023 Jun 18.
2
Health System Decentralization: Creating as Many Problems Than It Solves? Comment on "The Effects of Health Sector Fiscal Decentralisation on Availability, Accessibility, and Utilisation of Healthcare Services: A Panel Data Analysis".卫生系统权力下放:制造的问题多于解决的问题?评“卫生部门财政分权对医疗服务的可及性、可及性和利用的影响:面板数据分析”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7432. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7432. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
3
Making Sense of the Complexity of Decentralised Governance Comment on "The Effects of Health Sector Fiscal Decentralisation on Availability, Accessibility, and Utilisation of Healthcare Services: A Panel Data Analysis".解析分散治理的复杂性 评“卫生部门财政分权对医疗服务提供、可及性和利用的影响:面板数据分析”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7449. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7449. Epub 2023 Jan 1.
4
The Effects of Health Sector Fiscal Decentralisation on Availability, Accessibility, and Utilisation of Healthcare Services: A Panel Data Analysis.卫生部门财政分权对医疗服务的可及性、可及性和利用的影响:面板数据分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2440-2450. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.163. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
5
Decentralization and health system performance - a focused review of dimensions, difficulties, and derivatives in India.权力下放与卫生系统绩效——对印度的维度、困难及衍生问题的重点综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 31;16(Suppl 6):561. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1784-9.
6
Does Decentralization Improve Health System Performance and Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? A Systematic Review of Evidence From Quantitative Studies.去中心化是否能提高中低收入国家的卫生系统绩效和结果?来自定量研究的证据的系统评价。
Milbank Q. 2018 Jun;96(2):323-368. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12327.
7
U-Form vs. M-Form: How to Understand Decision Autonomy Under Healthcare Decentralization? Comment on "Decentralisation of Health Services in Fiji: A Decision Space Analysis".U 型与 M 型:如何理解医疗去中心化下的决策自主性?评“斐济卫生服务去中心化:决策空间分析”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Sep 1;5(9):561-563. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.73.
8
Decentralization of health care systems and health outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment.医疗保健系统的去中心化与健康结果:来自自然实验的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Sep;188:69-81. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.041. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
9
Decentralization and decision space in the health sector: a case study from Karnataka, India.卫生部门的权力下放与决策空间:来自印度卡纳塔克邦的案例研究
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Mar;31(2):171-81. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv034. Epub 2015 May 12.
10
Does fiscal decentralization improve health outcomes? Evidence from infant mortality in Italy.财政分权是否能改善健康状况?来自意大利婴儿死亡率的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;164:74-88. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.017. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The Dangers of Fiscal Decentralisation in Healthcare: A Response to the Recent Commentaries.医疗保健领域财政分权的危险:对近期评论的回应
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:8266. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.8266. Epub 2023 Sep 20.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effects of Health Sector Fiscal Decentralisation on Availability, Accessibility, and Utilisation of Healthcare Services: A Panel Data Analysis.卫生部门财政分权对医疗服务的可及性、可及性和利用的影响:面板数据分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2440-2450. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.163. Epub 2021 Nov 28.
2
The impacts of decentralization on health system equity, efficiency and resilience: a realist synthesis of the evidence.去中心化对卫生系统公平性、效率和弹性的影响:证据的现实主义综合。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Oct 1;34(8):605-617. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz055.
3
Effects of decentralization of primary health care on diabetes mellitus in Brazil.基层医疗保健去中心化对巴西糖尿病的影响。
Public Health. 2019 Jan;166:108-120. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
4
Does Decentralization Improve Health System Performance and Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? A Systematic Review of Evidence From Quantitative Studies.去中心化是否能提高中低收入国家的卫生系统绩效和结果?来自定量研究的证据的系统评价。
Milbank Q. 2018 Jun;96(2):323-368. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12327.
5
Decentralization of health care systems and health outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment.医疗保健系统的去中心化与健康结果:来自自然实验的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Sep;188:69-81. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.041. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
6
Decentralization of health systems in low and middle income countries: a systematic review.中低收入国家卫生系统的去中心化:系统评价。
Int J Public Health. 2017 Mar;62(2):219-229. doi: 10.1007/s00038-016-0872-2. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
7
Health governance: principal-agent linkages and health system strengthening.卫生治理:委托代理关系与卫生系统强化
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Sep;29(6):685-93. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs132. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
8
Governance in managing public health resources in Brazilian municipalities.巴西各市公共卫生资源管理中的治理
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Sep;29(6):694-702. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt003. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
9
Unplanned readmissions after hospital discharge among patients identified as being at high risk for readmission using a validated predictive algorithm.使用经过验证的预测算法被确定为再入院高风险患者出院后的非计划再入院情况。
Open Med. 2011;5(2):e104-11. Epub 2011 May 31.