Enhancing Priority-Setting Decision-Making Process Through Use of Intersectionality for Public Participation.
作者信息
Kapilashrami Anuj, Razavi Donya, Majdzadeh Reza
机构信息
School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
Department of Health, Aging and Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
出版信息
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:8095. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.8095. Epub 2023 May 21.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Enhancing Priority-Setting Decision-Making Process Through Use of Intersectionality for Public Participation.通过运用交叉性理论促进公众参与以优化优先事项设定决策过程。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:8095. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.8095. Epub 2023 May 21.
2
Health Technology Assessment as Part of a Broader Process for Priority Setting and Resource Allocation.卫生技术评估作为优先排序和资源配置更广泛过程的一部分。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Oct;17(5):573-576. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00488-1.
3
Patterns of public participation.公众参与模式
J Health Organ Manag. 2016 Aug 15;30(5):751-68. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-03-2016-0037.
4
Ethics and equity in research priority-setting: stakeholder engagement and the needs of disadvantaged groups.研究优先级设定中的伦理与公平：利益相关者参与及弱势群体需求
Indian J Med Ethics. 2015 Apr-Jun;12(2):110-3. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2015.030. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
5
Public participation in health planning and priority setting at the district level in Uganda.乌干达地区层面公众参与卫生规划及确定优先事项的情况。
Health Policy Plan. 2003 Jun;18(2):205-13. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czg025.
6
Participation in health care priority-setting through the eyes of the participants.从参与者的视角看医疗保健优先事项的设定。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002 Oct;7(4):222-9. doi: 10.1258/135581902320432750.
7
Successful priority setting in low and middle income countries: a framework for evaluation.在中低收入国家成功设定优先级：评估框架。
Health Care Anal. 2010 Jun;18(2):129-47. doi: 10.1007/s10728-009-0115-2. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
8
The Intersectionality Toolbox: A Resource for Teaching and Applying an Intersectional Lens in Public Health.《交叉性工具箱：公共卫生教学与应用交叉视角的资源》
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 2;9:772301. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.772301. eCollection 2021.
9
Setting priorities: is there a role for citizens' juries?确定优先事项：公民陪审团能发挥作用吗？
BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1591-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1591.
10
Public engagement in priority-setting: results from a pan-Canadian survey of decision-makers in cancer control.公众参与确定优先事项：全加拿大癌症控制决策者调查结果
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Dec;122:130-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.038. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
引用本文的文献
1
A realist review of how, why, for whom and in which contexts quality improvement in healthcare impacts inequalities.关于医疗保健质量改进如何、为何、针对何人以及在何种背景下影响不平等现象的现实主义综述。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Jul 18;34(8):537-546. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017386.
2
Challenges in institutionalizing evidence-informed priority setting for health service packages: a qualitative document and interview analysis from Iran.将证据转化为健康服务套餐优先事项的制度化挑战：来自伊朗的定性文件和访谈分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 19;22(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01207-6.
本文引用的文献
1
Institutionalisation Is a Vital Element for Fairness of Priority Setting in the Package Design if the Target is Universal Health Coverage Comment on "Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefits Package Design - Part II: A Practical Guide".如果目标是全民健康覆盖，那么在一揽子计划设计中，制度化是公平确定优先次序的重要因素 述评“基于证据的健康福利包设计审议程序 - 第二部分：实用指南”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7544. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7544. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
2
Salient stakeholders: Using the salience stakeholder model to assess stakeholders' influence in healthcare priority setting.重要利益相关者：运用显著利益相关者模型评估利益相关者在医疗保健优先级设定中的影响力。
Health Policy Open. 2021 Jul 17;2:100048. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100048. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Community participation and stakeholder engagement in determining health service coverage: A systematic review and framework synthesis to assess effectiveness.社区参与和利益相关者参与确定卫生服务覆盖范围：系统评价和框架综合评估有效性。
J Glob Health. 2023 May 12;13:04034. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04034.
4
Decision-making processes for essential packages of health services: experience from six countries.基本卫生服务一揽子计划决策过程：来自六个国家的经验。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jan;8(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010704.
5
Country readiness and prerequisites for successful design and transition to implementation of essential packages of health services: experience from six countries.国家准备情况以及成功设计和过渡到基本卫生服务包实施的前提条件：来自六个国家的经验。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jan;8(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010720.
6
Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Legitimate Health Benefit Package Design - Part I: Conceptual Framework.循证决策过程用于设计合理的健康福利套餐 - 第一部分：概念框架。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Oct 19;11(10):2319-2326. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.158. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
7
"Applying Intersectionality in designing and implementing health interventions: a scoping review"."在设计和实施健康干预措施中应用交叉性：范围综述"。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;21(1):1407. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11449-6.
8
Defining the Benefit Package of Thailand Universal Coverage Scheme: From Pragmatism to Sophistication.定义泰国全民覆盖计划的福利包：从实用主义到复杂化。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Apr 1;9(4):133-137. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.96.
9
Applying priority-setting frameworks: A review of public and vulnerable populations' participation in health-system priority setting.应用优先排序框架：对公众和弱势群体参与卫生系统优先排序的审查。
Health Policy. 2020 Feb;124(2):133-142. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.12.005. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
Zotero 插件