Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7776. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7776. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
This commentary reviews the Scurr and colleagues' article published in in February 2022 on "Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study." Schur adds to the current knowledge base by extending the stakeholder groups in deliberative dialogues (DD) to members of the affected community, a practice not commonly used in such DD strategies. Their study supports the inclusion of public participants in such dialogues, and offers practical guidelines for ways in which to accommodate these important participants. This commentary highlights the need to acknowledge diverse types of knowing into what is considered evidence and advocates for evidence to include a wide-ranging variety of sources including tacit knowledge via experience and ongoing learning.
这篇评论回顾了 Scurr 及其同事于 2022 年 2 月在《评价参与协商对话的公众：一项单一案例研究》上发表的文章。Schur 通过将协商对话（DD）中的利益相关者群体扩展到受影响社区的成员，从而为当前的知识库做出了贡献，这种做法在这种 DD 策略中并不常见。他们的研究支持将公众参与者纳入此类对话，并为如何容纳这些重要参与者提供了实用的指导方针。本评论强调了需要承认不同类型的知识，将其纳入被认为是证据的范畴，并主张证据应包括各种来源，包括通过经验和持续学习获得的隐性知识。
